Hi
One of my DL360G5 boxes running 7.0 had a panic this night:
jb-2 ~$ uname -rsv
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p4 #2: Thu Sep 4 10:49:27
CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL360G5
The config is a GENERIC with some pf, IPSEC and ALTQ stuff enabled.
jb-2 /usr/o
On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual
rule inserted is "pass on lo0 inet from 123.123.123.123 to
123.123.123.123 flags S/SA keep state". Where did that "keep state"
come
.123 flags S/SA keep state". Where did that "keep state"
come from?
Thanks for ideas :)
HTH,
Alex
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 16:33 +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
I got a FreeBSD 7 machine running mail services (among other things).
This machine recently replaced a FreeBSD 6.2
erent IP that is not
affected.
Does anyone have any clues about what I can look at and tune to fix
this?
Thanks!
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:40 AM, LI Xin wrote:
For your question: just reboot would be fine, you may want to tune
your arc size (to be smaller) and kmem space (to be larger), which
would reduce the chance that this would happen, or eliminate it,
depending on your workload.
Back online now, wit
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:37 AM, LI Xin wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
A box of mine running RELENG_7_0 and ZFS over a couple of disks (6
disks, 3 mirrors) seems to have gotten stuck. From Ctrl-T:
load: 0.50 cmd: zsh 40188
[zfs:&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:17:38AM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
A box of mine running RELENG_7_0 and ZFS over a couple of disks (6
disks, 3
mirrors) seems to have gotten stuck. From Ctrl-T:
load: 0.50 cmd: zsh 40188
[zfs
r so before I hard reboot it, unless it
"unlocks" or if anyone have any suggestions.
Thanks
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi,
I got a machine running 6.2 right now, which is being replaced. And
since SMP performance is much better on 7.x I'd like to go with 7.0
(and many ppl have indeed verified that it works go
or will be LOTS of work,
or just some patch line adjusting? Ie, how big are the changes from
6.x to 7.x in these sections?
Thank you for any answers or pointers.
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
free
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/su
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00553302/c00553302.pdf
seems
to tell me that in basic mode I can only access BIOS (pre-OS)
On Mar 13, 2008, at 4:57 PM, David Schutt wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Sean Winn wrote:
For using HP blades and standard iLO (no licensed advance
features), it works perfectly well, installing both FreeBSD 5 and
6 on the blades I've tried, using a remote in
erial console on a normal licensed
iLO?
The iLO web interface nominally requires/is tested only on Windows/
IE setup, but I do my work from a Mac running Safari, and have no
problems to date.
On 13/03/2008, at 10:41 AM, Johan Ström wrote:
On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:4
On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
But.. http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00553302/c00553302.pdf
seems to tell me that in basic mode I can only access BIOS (pre-
OS) using the Remote Console feature, and that after POST I have to
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Joe Koberg wrote:
The iLO is a completely separate management processor with its own
network port. It runs its own OS and has its own IP address. It runs
an SSL webserver for access. The iLO is accessible over the network
any time the machine is plugged into p
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Pete French wrote:
How long have you run 7.0 (before release)? From all the other
responses it seems lots of ppl use 7.0 on these without any problems
at all.
I've been running it since last september - never had any problem with
it, and am pretty convinced it is
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johan Ström wrote:
Hello!
Im looking into getting a new server box to replace a Supermicro box,
which unfortunately have a bunch of problems with heat, random
hangups,
crappy IPMI/remote
First of all, nice with all these positive answers! Thank you all
(without responding to each and every post:))!
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Pete French wrote:
What I'm looking at is a DL360 G5, probably with one E5335 (quad 2.0)
and 4G of RAM and 4x 146Gb SAS disks on the Smart Array P400
e load will be).
Thanks!
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Jan 17, 2008, at 09:30 , Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 1:31 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Export the disk on the backup server with ggated. Bind it on the
client
with ggatec. Slap a GELI or GBDE encryption on top of it and then
put a
ZFS on top of it.
You can
On Jan 16, 2008, at 19:02 , Toomas Aas wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
My main problem with existing solutions is this "gap" of
encryption on the backup server side. I dont want it to be
readable outside of my box (without encryption keys ofcourse), so
as soon as I send it of fro
On Jan 16, 2008, at 23:27 , Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Wed, 16.01.2008 at 00:26:34 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
I create regular tarball (gziped maybee) with some files i want to
backup,
Then i encrypt this file with ie gpg. Then i send of this file
using some
unspecified network protocol to
On Jan 15, 2008, at 22:09 , Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 15/01/2008, at 8:52 PM, Johan Ström wrote:
I'm looking to invest in some new hardware for backup. probably
some kind of NAS (a 4-disk 1U NAS or something in that size). The
thing is that I won't be the only one with acce
On Jan 15, 2008, at 13:44 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:40:02PM +0100, Vladimir Botka wrote:
Dne Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:52:56 +0100
Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
Hello
I'm looking to invest in some new hardware for backup. probably some
kind of NA
On Jan 15, 2008, at 15:03 , Ronald Klop wrote:
This sounds like a problem for 'tarsnap'. It's from the same author
as portsnap.
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-09-13-encrypted-backup.html
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-08-29-tarsnap-update.html
http://www.tarsnap.com/
I never use
First of all, thanks for your extensive answer!
On Jan 15, 2008, at 13:34 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:52:56AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
I'm looking to invest in some new hardware for backup. probably
some kind
of NAS (a 4-disk 1U NAS or something in that size)
ed tarballs would be very nice (and I guess
that would be possible with geli version)
Maybe not the perfect list for this, but it is somewhat freebsd
specific and I'm sure some other ppl on the list have had simliar
situations :)
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PRO
On Dec 28, 2007, at 13:41 , Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:15:38PM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
Thats my home dir on core!.. That should very much not be visible
there! I have full access now (from the wrong jail!)
Known bug or did I just stumble upon something pretty bad??
Y
home dir on core!.. That should very much not be visible
there! I have full access now (from the wrong jail!)
Known bug or did I just stumble upon something pretty bad??
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
fr
On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:37 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:16:45PM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
Im playing with a new box running RELENG_7.0 from yesterday. I got
two
discs with gmirror on ad[6|14]s1a and zfs-mirror on s1d. When o do
atacontrol detach ata7 (detach ad14
uld anyone be interested in having it, on the wiki or
otherwise?
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
No-one with any clues or recommendations? :/ CCing to -stable too..
Thanks
--
Johan Ström
Stromnet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stromnet.se/
On Oct 29, 2007, at 09:37 , Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
I got a FreeBSD 6.2 box running a few jails, with a pretty strict
PF ruleset. I got a problem
On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:21 , CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
altough, one thing that I got curious about. In the fdisk manpage it
says -b can be used to change the bootcode.. and that default is
/boot/mbr.. What is this? I checked md5 against boot0 and its not the
same (altough I
On Aug 21, 2007, at 17:53 , Johan Ström wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 16:31 , Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
All in all, your partition table seems to be gone. If you created
it on
gmirror before (gm0s1) you may still have the same partition table on
the other half of the mirror. You can try to
On Aug 21, 2007, at 16:31 , Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
FreeBSD gw-1.stromnet.se 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #7:
Tue Feb 13 18:24:34 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/
src/sys/ROUTER.POLLING i386
tead of ad6 is probably minimal, its a router so its more or less
only logging that seems to been lost... For now I just want to get
clear about wth happened here and how to prevent it, and how to get
back up on a gmirror with ad6 and ad4 (to be plugged in) so I can
throw ad0 out...
Thanks
ng disks, no errors.. I
have run powermax (maxtors own test program) a while back on the
maxtor disks, no problems.. I have tried changing SATA cables on some
of the disks, no difference..
Does anyone have any clue about what can be causing this? What is
most likely? How do we hunt this down?
d[85742]: error: channel 0: chan_read_failed
for istate 3
The backup process works by first executing a pre-script, then
scp'ing, then executing a post-script.. so those errors looks like
they appear directly when the ssh session is disconnected.
Anyone else with clues?
Johan S
Hi
I just tried to enable network polling on my router box, a P2 400MHz
with 3 different NICs (one internal, i think its the fxp one):
fxp0: port 0x7c60-0x7c7f mem
0xf3dff000-0xf3df,0xf3f0-0xf3ff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0
miibus0: on fxp0
inphy0: on miibus0
inphy0: 10bas
fOn Sep 25, 2006, at 09:55 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:36, Johan Ström wrote:
What exactly does
kernel dumps on /dev/mirror/gm0s1b
mean? Not that it saves any kernel dumps at least.. But otoh I
have no clue why it
It means exactly that. IIRC kernel dumps are
On Sep 25, 2006, at 08:45 , Jiawei Ye wrote:
On 9/25/06, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fcking great.. Waking up and noting that the box has rebooted it self
during the night... Yay!!... No kernel dumps, nothing in message
log.. Nada... (this was on the "first" box,
ot that it saves any kernel dumps at least.. But otoh I have
no clue why it crashed at all and if it even did try to dump kernel
or if it just blacked out as when i tried to debug clamd...
--
Johan
On Sep 24, 2006, at 14:23 , Johan Ström wrote:
Okay, I got some problems here now... I'
d (id=316220990).
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider mirror/gm0 launched.
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gm0s1a
So.. Wtf is the problem here?...
Hope someone can help me..
Thanks
On Sep 23, 2006,
On Sep 3, 2006, at 14:13 , Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I'm about to get a "new" server... In this case what I'm looking at
is a Gigabyte GA-K8NSC mobo with nForce3 250Gb chipset, and a AMD
64 3200+ Venice S939.
Does anyone have any experience with FreeBSD (6.1) and this
SATA? Any stability/
performance issues?
I did notice it was mentioned on http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/
amd64/motherboards.html on 5.4 with the only comment "Sound and USB
untested.".. So.. anyone got more detailed experience than that?
Thanks :)
-
Hi
If i've understood correctly gmirror uses the last sector on the
provider for a metadata.
If one uses http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/
FreeBSD_Basics.html to setup a gmirror'ed system, that is haveing a
fully used disk
where the last sector is used (right?) and converting it to
On Jul 28, 2006, at 13:15 , Johan Ström wrote:
On 17 jul 2006, at 17.40, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
[..]
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/
and post the output of
smartctl -a /dev/ad8
smartmontools was previously installed and running as
On 17 jul 2006, at 17.40, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
[..]
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/
and post the output of
smartctl -a /dev/ad8
smartmontools was previously installed and running as daemon
without any bad reports.
I can not run "smart
On 17 jul 2006, at 16.51, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 05:59 AM 17/07/2006, Johan Ström wrote:
On 17 jul 2006, at 00.53, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 03:02 PM 14/07/2006, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
After reboot (command reboot), system boot up with both disks
attached and start autosynchronization. I do
On 17 jul 2006, at 00.53, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 03:02 PM 14/07/2006, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
After reboot (command reboot), system boot up with both disks
attached and start autosynchronization. I do not know, if this is
hw or sw error, I got
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/s
On 13 jul 2006, at 14.26, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Johan Ström wrote:
And now again... raid gone degraded only 2 days after reboot!
Jul 12 22:22:50 elfi kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached
Jul 12 22:22:50 elfi kernel: subdisk4: detached
Jul 12 22:22:50 elfi kernel: ad4
On 10 jul 2006, at 13.59, Johan Ström wrote:
On 10 jul 2006, at 11.09, Johan Ström wrote:
On 21 maj 2006, at 11.16, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I've had problems before with GEOM mirror and my SATA drives, and
i've posted about it here before too. The solution seemd to be a
On 10 jul 2006, at 11.09, Johan Ström wrote:
On 21 maj 2006, at 11.16, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I've had problems before with GEOM mirror and my SATA drives, and
i've posted about it here before too. The solution seemd to be a
change of motherboard, this reduced the crash very
On 21 maj 2006, at 11.16, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I've had problems before with GEOM mirror and my SATA drives, and
i've posted about it here before too. The solution seemd to be a
change of motherboard, this reduced the crash very much (and also
the speeds archieved was greatl
On 8 jul 2006, at 09.18, J. Buck Caldwell wrote:
Forgive the cross-posting, but I think I need a wider audience.
Is it possible to track pf ALTQ usage with MRTG? I notice that
FreeBSD's built-in bsnmpd has a module and mibs to support pf, but
I know too little about SNMP to figure out how t
On 22 jun 2006, at 18.45, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 22), Johan Strm said:
On 22 jun 2006, at 17.42, Dan Nelson wrote:
If it ever happens again, you can drop to the debugger with
Ctrl-Alt-ESC and run "ps" to get a list of running processes. You
might even be able to recover b
On 22 jun 2006, at 17.42, Dan Nelson wrote:
If it ever happens again, you can drop to the debugger with
Ctrl-Alt-ESC and run "ps" to get a list of running processes. You
might even be able to recover by killing some offending processes with
"kill 9 ", then continue with "c".
Hm, I
On 22 jun 2006, at 09.57, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
Anyway.. I'm using default login.conf, which have unlimited for all
resource limits.. So wtf is this?
Look at
# sysctl kern.maxproc
Okay, 4096 procs... But what was those 4k procs...On my newly booted
i got 127... W
Hi
Today I woke up and was not able to log in to my system (ssh). Some
stuff worked (DNS for example, this box runs bind), altough the IMAP
server didnt work to well...
Anyway, I checked out local console:
maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) and login.conf(5).
Repeated 23
Hi
I've had problems before with GEOM mirror and my SATA drives, and
i've posted about it here before too. The solution seemd to be a
change of motherboard, this reduced the crash very much (and also the
speeds archieved was greatly improved, from 10-15MB/s to 40-50MB/s..).
However after th
On 10 feb 2006, at 07.15, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi list!
I've been experiencing problems earlier with gmirror (thread "Page
fault, GEOM problem??"). My gmirror crashed, and the box compleatly
froze.
Now I got a new mobo, and it has been working great since (no
crashes, and
On 10 feb 2006, at 07.43, Johan Ström wrote:
On 10 feb 2006, at 07.15, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi list!
I've been experiencing problems earlier with gmirror (thread "Page
fault, GEOM problem??"). My gmirror crashed, and the box
compleatly froze.
Now I got a new mobo, and it h
On 10 feb 2006, at 07.15, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi list!
I've been experiencing problems earlier with gmirror (thread "Page
fault, GEOM problem??"). My gmirror crashed, and the box compleatly
froze.
Now I got a new mobo, and it has been working great since (no
crashes, and
On 1 feb 2006, at 11.42, Holm Tiffe wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
On 1 feb 2006, at 10.57, Holm Tiffe wrote:
Derkjan de Haan wrote:
All,
Today, after a cvsup (RELENG_6) and a rebuild of kernel and
world, my
system no longer boots. It hangs on
Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
On 23 jan 2006, at 20.01, Johan Ström wrote:
On 23 jan 2006, at 14.15, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:24 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
On 23 jan 2006, at 09.53, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 06:43 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Wish I could be of more help
solid
since.
These disk should be SATA150 afaik (Maxtor MaXLine III 300Gb).
The promise card is named SATAII 150..
So shouldnt be any missmatching. Both card and disks supports NCQ..
Dunno about freebsd on the other hand..Havent found a way to enable/
disable this
Johan Ström wrote:
On 2
On 23 jan 2006, at 14.15, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:24 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
On 23 jan 2006, at 09.53, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 06:43 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Wish I could be of more help. :) Have you tried to toggle the
sysctl
dma
On 23 jan 2006, at 09.53, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 06:43 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Wish I could be of more help. :) Have you tried to toggle the sysctl
dma flags? I've seen similar posts in the past with read timeouts
caused from dma being enabled.
# sysctl -a |
On 23 jan 2006, at 01.17, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 23:51 +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
...snip...
On 22 jan 2006, at 22.58, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
This card does afaik dont have raid functionalitys (I've never read
anything about it either on the web, the cards b
On 22 jan 2006, at 22.58, Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
...snip...
Can there be problems with the mobo/controllercard? Or is it more
likely to be driver realted? Promise lists my motherboard (asus
a7v333) in their manual for the controllercard (promise sataII 150
TX4).
...snip...
After loo
On 29 nov 2005, at 21.10, Johan Ström wrote:
On 19 nov 2005, at 00.30, Michal Mertl wrote:
Parv wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Michal
Mertl thusly...
Johan Ström wrote:
On 18 nov 2005, at 18.43, Xin LI wrote:
...
So, it seems it does run savecore after running dump
On 29 nov 2005, at 21.10, Johan Ström wrote:
I just got another coredump, hadn't had one since the first one.
From messages:
Nov 29 20:36:54 elfi kernel: subdisk10: detached
Nov 29 20:36:54 elfi kernel: ad10: detached
Nov 29 20:36:54 elfi kernel: unknown: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA48 retrying
On 19 nov 2005, at 00.30, Michal Mertl wrote:
Parv wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Michal
Mertl thusly...
Johan Ström wrote:
On 18 nov 2005, at 18.43, Xin LI wrote:
...
So, it seems it does run savecore after running dumpon and
mounting disks etc... Is that wrong?
No
On 19 nov 2005, at 02.35, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:55:57AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
+> I just noticed another thing... My disk performance... sucks! :P
+>
+> Some examples (from an otherwise unloaded system):
+>
+> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/johan$
On 18 nov 2005, at 23.39, Michal Mertl wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
Hi!
On 18 nov 2005, at 18.43, Xin LI wrote:
Hi, Johan,
< large snip>
So, it seems it does run savecore after running dumpon and mounting
disks etc... Is that wrong?
No, this is normal. When you run savecore you n
Hi!
On 18 nov 2005, at 18.43, Xin LI wrote:
Hi, Johan,
On 11/18/05, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 nov 2005, at 10.17, Xin LI wrote:
[snip]
Doesnt look like I got any "usable" dump devices..
When booting i get
[...]
Loading configuration files.
No suitable
On 18 nov 2005, at 10.17, Xin LI wrote:
On 11/18/05, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, just got this not so very nice error on a RELENG_6_0 box (built
from sources this morning, GENERIC kernel minus drivers I dont use):
The network card is the exact same model as the one I u
Ok, just got this not so very nice error on a RELENG_6_0 box (built
from sources this morning, GENERIC kernel minus drivers I dont use):
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: subdisk10: detached
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: ad10: detached
Nov 17 15:35:43 elfi kernel: unknown: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying
On 10 nov 2005, at 12.54, Johan Ström wrote:
On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago
(against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new.
Im trying
On 10 nov 2005, at 13.55, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:46:37PM +0100,
Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 112 lines which said:
Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239,
all the latest from ports.
The problem I have i
On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago
(against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new.
Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and
Hi
I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago
(against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new.
Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239,
all the latest from ports.
The problem I have is this: If i have LoadModule python_module
libexec/ap
84 matches
Mail list logo
