On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:19:24 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
>> when booting stable/9 under a debug kernel with WITNESS
>> enabled and verbose I get the following panic..
>>
>> It seems very much like the discussion from a year back on
>> curr
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Alexander Nikiforenko
wrote:
>>hi, i was run ssh-keygen with output to 32g usb 3.0 flash, and got this core
>
> sorry, i was forgot.
> i mount that flash via fusefs-exfat-0.9.8
This is on stable/9?
If yes, I will send you patches to use new fuse approach in a whil
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> schrieb Attilio Rao am 29.10.2012 23:02 (localtime):
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 27.10.2012 23:07 (localtime):
>>>> On Sat,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
>>>> On 8/8/12, Harald Schma
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
> wrote:
>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
>>> On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>>>> schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 P
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marcelo Gondim
>> wrote:
>>> I installed the package ntfs-fusefs on two different servers and both causes
>>>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
> I installed the package ntfs-fusefs on two different servers and both causes
> kernel panic when trying to copy anything.
> A server using FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE amd64 and the other using FreeBSD 9 RC1
> amd64.
> Someone is having the same probl
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
>> On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>>> schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
>>>>>> mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
exclusive locked but should be
KDB: enter: lock violation
>>>
>>> Pavel
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
exclusive locked but should be
KDB: enter: lock violation
>>>
>>> Pavel
On 8/2/12, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:48:48 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 05:53 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > Index: vfs_subr.c
>> > ===
>> > --- vfs_subr.c (revision 238969)
>> > +++ vfs_
On 8/1/12, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 8/1/12, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:19 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On 7/31/12, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
>>> >> Working on the Dell
On 8/1/12, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:19 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On 7/31/12, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
>> >> Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the
>>
On 7/31/12, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
>> Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the
>> broadcom ethernet cards! However, I get the following when I reboot the
>> system:
>>
>> Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4 Sleeping th
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
>>>> For
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
>> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&
2012/5/25, Sean Bruno :
> Dell R620, getting pretty reliable panics here everytime I reboot.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sandybridge_reboot_panic.txt
I'm sure that if you drop hwpmc you will get rid of it.
it would be good if you however get something for Davide and George
that they can
2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, F
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attil
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
>> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
>> hang, the box was running a process with about 2
2012/2/13, Pavel Polyakov :
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165087
>
> Occurs simply trying to use unionfs:
> mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
>
> insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
> exclusive locked but should be
> KDB: enter: lock violation
Pave
2012/2/14, Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger (from Fri, 10
> Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0100):
>
>> Such a kernel would cover situations where people compile their own
>> kernel because they want to get rid of some unused kernel code (and
>> maybe even need the memory this frees up).
>>
2011/12/15 Steve Kargl :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identified 4
>> real report on which we could work on and summarizied in the attached
>> Excel file.
>> I'd
2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>>
> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
> usin
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:56 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> So, as very first thing, can you try the following:
>> - Same codebase, etc. etc.
>> - Make the test 4 times, discard the first and ministat for the other 3
>> - Reboot
>> - Change the steal_
2011/12/15 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick :
>> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> >> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn&#
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking now to a better test-case for this: can you try that on a
>> tmpfs volume?
>
> There is enough RAM in the box so that it should not touch the disk, and
> I was sending the
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:26 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>> was that just the same codebase with the switch SCHED_4BSD/SCHED_ULE?
>
> Hi Attilio,
> It was the same codebase.
>
>
>> Could you retry the bench checking
2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>> > issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>> > performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
>>
>> Do we have any
2011/12/13 Daniel Kalchev :
>
>
> On 13.12.11 09:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>> I personally would find it interesting if someone with a higher-end system
>> (e.g. 2 physical CPUs, with 6 or 8 cores per CPU) was to do the same test
>> (changing -jX to -j{numofcores} of course).
>
>
> Is 4 way 8 c
2011/12/14 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/13/2011 7:01 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone experiencing problems tried to set sysctl
>> kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 ?
>>
>> I don't remember what our specific problem at $WORK was, perhaps it
>> was just interrupt threads not getting serviced fast enou
2011/12/9 George Mitchell :
> dnetc is an open-source program from http://www.distributed.net/. It
> tries a brute-force approach to cracking RC4 puzzles and also computes
> optimal Golomb rulers. It starts up one process per CPU and runs at
> nice 20 and is, for all intents and purposes, 100% co
2011/12/10 Eitan Adler :
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:15 PM, George Mitchell wrote:
>> Hope the attached helps. -- George Mitchell
>
> You attached dmesg, not a patch.
This is what is needed for a schedgraph analysis, along with KTR
points collection.
Attilio
--
Peace ca
2011/12/10 George Mitchell :
> On 12/09/11 10:17, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> More precisely I'd be interested in KTR traces.
>> To be even more precise:
>> With a completely stable GENERIC configuration (or otherwise please
>> post your k
2011/12/9 George Mitchell :
> dnetc is an open-source program from http://www.distributed.net/. It
> tries a brute-force approach to cracking RC4 puzzles and also computes
> optimal Golomb rulers. It starts up one process per CPU and runs at
> nice 20 and is, for all intents and purposes, 100% co
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl :
>> Hi,
>
> Hello, thanks for reply.
>>
>> Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
>> build your wifi support as a module.)
>> Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
>>
> First i make kldunload if_iwn.
> When i try to suspend f
2011/9/1 Trent Nelson :
>
> On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>> If nobody complains about it earlier, I'll propose the patch to re@ in 8
>> hours.
>
> Just a friendly 'me too', for the records. 22 hours of heavy network/disk
> I/O an
If nobody complains about it earlier, I'll propose the patch to re@ in 8 hours.
Attilio
2011/8/19 Mike Tancsa :
> On 8/18/2011 8:37 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
>
>>> st> Thanks, Attilio. I've applied the patch and removed the extra debug
>>> st> options I had added (though keeping debug symbols). I'
2011/8/12 Andrew Boyer :
> Re: panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? (originally on freebsd-net)
> Re: debugging frequent kernel panics on 8.2-RELEASE (originally on
> freebsd-stable)
> Re: System hang in USB umass module while processing panic (originally on
> freebsd-usb)
>
> Hello Andriy and
2011/8/18 Andriy Gapon :
> on 17/08/2011 23:21 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> It seems like everything starts with some kind of a race between
>> terminating
>> processes in a jail and termination of the jail itself. This is where the
>> details are very thin so far. What we see is that a
2011/8/18 Hiroki Sato :
> Hiroki Sato wrote
> in <20110818.043332.27079545013461535@allbsd.org>:
>
> hr> Attilio Rao wrote
> hr> in :
> hr>
> hr> at> 2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato :
> hr> at> > Hi,
> hr> at> >
> hr> at> &
2011/8/18 Hiroki Sato :
> Hiroki Sato wrote
> in <20110818.043332.27079545013461535@allbsd.org>:
>
> hr> Attilio Rao wrote
> hr> in :
> hr>
> hr> at> 2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato :
> hr> at> > Hi,
> hr> at> >
> hr> at> &
2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato :
> Hi,
>
> Mike Tancsa wrote
> in <4e15a08c.6090...@sentex.net>:
>
> mi> On 7/7/2011 7:32 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> mi> > On 7/7/2011 4:20 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> mi> >>
> mi> >> BTW, we had a similar panic, "spinlock held too long", the spinlock
> mi> >> is the sched l
2011/8/11 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:59:36AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> That's not the issue as its happening across board over 130 machines :(
>
> Agreed, bad hardware sounds unlikely here. I could believe some strange
> incompatibility (e.g. BIOS quirk or the like[1]) t
I'd really point the finger to faulty hw.
Please run all the necessary diagnostic tools for catching it.
Attilio
2011/8/11 Andriy Gapon :
> on 10/08/2011 18:35 Steven Hartland said the following:
>> Fatal double fault
>> rip = 0x8052f6f1
>> rsp = 0xff86ce600fb0
>> rbp = 0xff86ce6
2011/6/4 Andriy Gapon :
> on 03/06/2011 20:57 Robert N. M. Watson said the following:
>>
>> On 3 Jun 2011, at 16:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value. If, yes, I
>>> am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
>>
>> The issue that p
2011/6/3 Nathan Whitehorn :
> On 06/03/11 10:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
>> If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
>>
>> I think that the default kdb behavior is the correct one, so it doesn't
>> make sense
2010/12/10 Arno J. Klaassen :
>
> Hello,
>
> just FYI that on an 8-way Tyan S3992-E based box, a reboot under
> 8.2-PRERELEASE (in fact, 8-stable since quite a while) makes the box
> freeze, whilst the same thing under -current works OK.
>
> For info the end of console output in both cases as well
This issue should be resolved by r214370 already; someone else can
validate this?
Thanks,
Attilio
2010/10/26 FreeBSD Tinderbox :
> TB --- 2010-10-26 06:20:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2010-10-26 06:20:40 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
> TB
Sorry for the mis-service, it should be fixed now.
Thanks,
Attilio
2010/10/26 Chip Camden :
> After a csup, building the GENERIC kernel on amd64 fails with:
>
> make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E"
> CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2 -frename-registers -pipe
> -f
2010/5/14 Giovanni Trematerra :
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
>>>> I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
>>>
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
> I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
> morning) and it does not panic now. It's really odd. If it reappears
> soon I will tell you.
I looked at the code with Giovanni and I have the feeling that the
race with the idle thread may still be fat
2010/4/9 Jakub Lach :
>
>
>
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>
>> Really shooting in the dark here: are there any BIOS options about HPET
>> and RTC on
>> this system? Can you try playing with them?
>>
>>
>
> Hello. I have similar problem. Once in few boots performance would be
> sluggish and
> top would
2010/4/8 Andriy Gapon :
> on 08/04/2010 04:29 Akephalos said the following:
>> Attilio, I csup-dated several hours ago and rebuilt and installed the kernel
>> (and world, in case it matters).
>>
>> %uname -a FreeBSD free.bsd369441.org 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Thu
>> Apr 8 03:01:13 EEST 20
2010/4/6 Akephalos Akephalos :
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> What architecture is it?
>> May you try setting machdep.lapic_allclocks to 1 in /boot/loader.conf?
>> May you report #dmesg | grep atrtc
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
2010/4/4 Akephalos Akephalos :
> Hey,
>
> I installed 8.0 release and used it very briefly until updating through
> cvsup to the latest stable source. I had no problems with the release (DVD)
> version, except that my wireless card wasn't detected, so updating was the
> natural thing to do. My hard
2010/1/27 Brandon Gooch :
> The machine, a Dell Optiplex 755, has been locking up recently. The
> situation usually occurs while using VirtualBox (running a 64-bit
> Windows 7 instance) and doing anything else in another xterm (such as
> rebuilding a port). I've been unable to reliably reproduce i
2010/1/21 Willem Jan Withagen :
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even
>> upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go.
>> Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE.
>>
>> I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did not wo
2010/1/19 Pete French :
>> May you post your kernel config?
>
> sure...
>
> include GENERIC
> ident DEBUG
> options KDB
> options DDB
> options WITNESS
> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
> options IN
2010/1/18 Pete French :
>> One may never know, try without WITNESS but still the same setup.
>
> Well, I have been running like this for three days with no lockups
> dissapointingly. I just saw that you commited the lock patches, so
> am going to update to the latest STABLE and go back to GENERIC t
2010/1/15 Pete French :
> Well, the machine has been running the WITNESS + INVARIANTS kernel
> for 20 hours now without locking up.This looks like what I
> saw before - compiling in WITNESS stops it locking up -(
>
> Is there any use in my runing a kernel with just INVARIANTS to see if
> that will
2010/1/14 Pete French :
>> INVARIANTS requires INVARIANT_SUPPORT [sic] in the kernel config (see
>> comments in GENERIC).
>
> Ah, right, that would explain it. Thanks!
INVARIANT_SUPPORT is made mandatory in order to allow non-INVARIANT
kernel to be able to handle INVARIANT compiled modules.
Atti
2010/1/14 Pete French :
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/lockmgr_fix8.diff
>>
>> I'm seeking for testers here.
>> Any report would be very much appreciated.
>
> I tested the patch on my machine which locks up, and I am afraid that it
> still locks, even with the patch applied. The last things on
As people following HEAD may have seen, around 1 month ago a fix to
lockmgr(9) has been committed that should prevent a deadlock for that
primitive (the fixup is composed by r200447,201703,201709-201710).
As long as the approach choosen in HEAD is optimal, unluckilly it does
introduce an ABI breaka
2009/10/23 Jaime Bozza :
> I believe I found a problem with the ULE scheduler - At least the fact that
> there is a problem, but I'm not sure where to go from here. The system
> locks all processes, but doesn't panic, so I have no output to give.
>
> I was able to duplicate this on three differ
2009/11/6 Dorr H. Clark :
>
>
> We believe we have identified a significant resource leak
> present in 6.x, 7.x, and 8.x. We believe this is a regression
> versus FreeBSD 4.x which appears to do the Right Thing (tm).
>
> We have a test program (see below) which will run the system
> out of sockets
2009/10/21 Igor Sysoev :
> Hi,
>
> for some reason in 8.0 top always shows 0% CPU usage for intr kernel
> process and active interrupt thread, "irq19 bge0" in my case.
>
> 8-0 RC1 top -PS:
>
> CPU 0: 27.8% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 65.0% idle
> CPU 1: 3.0% user, 0.0% nice,
2009/9/28 C. C. Tang :
> C. C. Tang wrote:
>>
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
>>>>>>> i
2009/9/24 Daniel O'Connor :
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/9/23 Daniel O'Connor :
>> > If I enable the parallel port on this Gigabyte MA7785GM-US2H I get
>> > a trap 12 when booting up.
>> >
>> > I forgot to take a picture o
2009/9/23 Daniel O'Connor :
> If I enable the parallel port on this Gigabyte MA7785GM-US2H I get a
> trap 12 when booting up.
>
> I forgot to take a picture of it at the time but I should be able to
> reproduce it tomorrow.
>
> Has anyone seen anything before? (a quick google showed nothing). I did
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
>>
>>
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and
the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
>
> My server is up for 3
2009/9/19 Dan Naumov :
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang wrote:
>>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>>>>
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>>
>>> Attilio
>>
>> Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
>> visible in "top" as a result)
>
> Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
>
> I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in produc
2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>>>>
>>>> Could that one (on i386) be related?
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>>>
>>> I have no idea about it but I
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
2009/7/29 Attilio Rao :
> 2009/5/23 Stefan Bethke :
>> I wrote:
>>
>>> Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...0 done
>>> All buffers synced.
>>> GEOM_MIRROR: Device diesel_root: provider mirror/diesel_root destroyed.
>>> Uptime: 6m32s
>>&
2009/7/26 barbara :
> It happened again, on shutdown.
> As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if
> it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours.
> I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission, doesn't
> terminate
2009/7/26 barbara :
> It happened again, on shutdown.
> As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if
> it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours.
> I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission, doesn't
> terminate
t; I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
>> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered
>> that it failed to write core dump. It also failed to reboot
>> automatically..
>
> I also have trouble like yours.
> http://lists.freebsd.org/
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>> Could that one (on i386) be related?
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>
>
> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it
> failed to write core dump. It also
2009/7/11 Oliver Pinter :
> regs and vnodes:
>
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01854.JPG
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01855.JPG
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01856.JPG
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freeb
2009/7/10 Oliver Pinter :
> Hello!
>
> Here is the bt:
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01845.JPG
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01846.JPG
> http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01847.JPG
Could you please add in this info
2009/7/10 Oliver Pinter :
> Hi all!
>
> It is a kernel panic, when force unmount the smbfs volume or lost the
> connection with the samba server.
>
> --
> Thes OS is:
>
>
> kern.ostype: FreeBSD
> kern.osrelease: 7.2-STABLE
> kern.osrevision: 199506
> kern.version: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jun 27
2009/7/8 Dan Naumov :
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>>
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>>
>>>
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
2009/6/29 pluknet :
> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>
2009/6/29 pluknet :
> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>>>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>&
2009/6/29 pluknet :
> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>>>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>>>>>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>
2009/6/29 pluknet :
> 2009/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>> 2009/6/29 pluknet :
>>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>>>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> While building a module on nfs mounted /usr/src
>>>>> I got an
2009/6/29 pluknet :
> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>> 2009/6/26 pluknet :
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> While building a module on nfs mounted /usr/src
>>> I got an unkillable process waiting forever in bo_wwait.
>>
>> Small note: iface on NFS server has mtu changed from 1500 to 1450.
>> Can this be a source of the pr
2009/6/10 NAKAJI Hiroyuki :
> Thanks Attilio,
>
> I set up dcons target/host pair. Target is 7.2-STABLE and host is
> 6.4-STABLE.
>
> Dcons session was recorded with script.
> http://www.heimat.gr.jp/localhost/dcons.log
I'm following up privately with the user, news to come hopefully.
Thanks,
Att
2009/6/6 NAKAJI Hiroyuki :
> Hi,
>
> I noticed, some months ago, frequent lockups on my RELENG_6 server with
> ECS PM800-M2, Celeron 2.6GHz (UP), 2GB ram, ATA HDDs and 3Com NIC(xl0),
> and then I gave up this old server.
>
> Last month, I replaced this 'unstable' server to the new one with
> 7.2-RE
2009/5/21 Riccardo Torrini :
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Try this. It reverts the single-CCB part of the previous
>> commit while keeping the other fixes. I missed that the
>> CCB might still be in flight when we schedule another rescan.
>
> Applied to mpt
Hello,
after MFC'ed the usage of LOCK_FILE and LOCK_LINE for lockmgr(9), now
thirdy part code needs to include sys/lock.h just priorior than
sys/lockmgr.
Even if the patch doesn't break ABI / KPI (so it doesn't need thirdy
part KLD to be recompiled), it worths noting that the new code needs
this ex
2008/3/25, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> so it's basically back to square one. We only have LORs between the pfil
> R/W lock (read instance) and mutexes that don't have any lock order with
> the pfil R/W lock (write instance) at all. This means the deadlock can't
> be explaine
2006/12/12, Suleiman Souhlal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
>> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> > >On Sun, Nov 26, 20
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
