2012/2/14, Alexander Leidinger <alexan...@leidinger.net>: > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <alexan...@leidinger.net> (from Fri, 10 > Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0100): > >> Such a kernel would cover situations where people compile their own >> kernel because they want to get rid of some unused kernel code (and >> maybe even need the memory this frees up). >> >> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you >> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out >> debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options >> which you add which you can not add as a module (SW_WATCHDOG comes >> to my mind)? If yes, which ones and how important are they for you? > > Here is what I got, the first column is the number of requests, the > second what is requested, and the 3rd my comments (basically it means, > if there is a comment, it is not needed/possible to include in a > modular kernel):
... > 2 SW_WATCHDOG This can become a module with very little effort I guess. Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
