Harald Servat wrote:
However, let me tell you what I've found now (I tried these options in the
following order).
**
a) I've started with option 2 (ACPI disabled) because I read somewhere
that FreeBSD did not support Lenovo T400's ACPI.
The system boots and freezes after showing
(someth
Hello Marat, Dan,
I suppose you guys are running amd64? Could you try i386? AFAIR the
interrupt storms have gone away after I moved my MSI machine to i386
on an affected box.
--
Best regards,
Danielmailto:dan...@freebsd.org
__
Mike Lempriere wrote:
> loading configuration: address in use
This error generally means that the old named is still running. Try
'rndc stop', and then do 'ps -ax | grep named'. If you still see
something running do '/etc/rc.d/named stop' check ps again, then when
you're sure no other named is ru
Dan Langille wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt
source
what is your motherboard brand? I have the same issue with interrupt
storms, as stated in [1] and I think tha
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:11:27PM -0800, Mike Lempriere wrote:
> From /var/log/messages:
> starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -t /var/named -u bind
> could not get query source dispatcher (0.0.0.0#53)
> loading configuration: address in use
> exiting (due to fatal error)
>
> I had just updated from 5-stable
From /var/log/messages:
starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -t /var/named -u bind
could not get query source dispatcher (0.0.0.0#53)
loading configuration: address in use
exiting (due to fatal error)
I had just updated from 5-stable (at 5.5) to 6-stable (at 6.4). Upon
today's upgrade I got to 7.1. Everythi
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt
source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected o
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on "irq22:"; thr
Jan 14 21:1
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on "irq22:"; thr
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: ott
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Václav Haisman wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
> directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
> try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not possible
> at al
Hello,
I am trying the new FIB stuff on -STABLE with IPFW, I made many tests
and it did not work as I expected.
Quick testing:
# lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
200.165.75.10
# setfib -1 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
189.52.141.2
# setfib -2 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
201
Frank Mayhar wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 19:00 +0100, Václav Haisman wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
>> directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
>> try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ganbold wrote:
> Ganbold wrote:
>
>> Harald Servat wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I downloaded FreeBSD 7.1 (DVD iso image) for amd64 architecture (with
>>> correct SHA256 checksum), but I'm unable to start the system (Lenovo
>>> T400).
>>>
>>> The boot process sta
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 19:00 +0100, Václav Haisman wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
> directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
> try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not possible
> at a
Hi,
I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not possible
at all or am I doing something wrong?
--
VH
__
> my problem in with others under the asusmption that it's all the same. This
> is onbiously pretty rare - out of 24 of the HP servers the problems only crops
> up on 4 of them. But there is nothing dfferent about those 4.
Could it be different bios/firmware on the hp-servers?
Mr. Aliyev was unab
At 09:34 AM 1/14/2009, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I have a 4.11 Stable version that has been working without problems
in the last years. We do not need nothing else for the moment but we
are looking to have more speed. It has been running under a double
Pentium III processor with 512MB of
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:28:45PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/01/2009 16:34 Jorge Biquez said the following:
> > b) If is possible to "clone" the same installation to a new faster disk
> > (like a sata 250GB). I know I can install a /.x version and for sure
> > will work but here the idea i
> a) Only put the disk in a new machine at least a double core with 2GB
> of RAM. My guess is that could boot with a few problems on
> hardware what do you think?
That should work fine - I have moved discs between machines with no
problems.
> b) If is possible to "clone" the same installati
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:39:53PM +0200, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having kernel dump with FreeBSD 7.1:
>
> Here is crashinfo output of it (Actually i don't know the state of
> crashinfo in Fbsd 7.1)
>
> 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 08:58:24 UTC 2009
> r...@driscol
on 14/01/2009 16:34 Jorge Biquez said the following:
> b) If is possible to "clone" the same installation to a new faster disk
> (like a sata 250GB). I know I can install a /.x version and for sure
> will work but here the idea is to have things running as usual without
> problems. This installatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ooops, sorry sleep() prevents loading of acpi module!
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Finally I found what is the problem.
>
> from ACPI CA release notes:
> ...
> 14 May 2008. Summary of changes for version 20080514:
>
> 1) ACPI CA Core Subs
Hello,
Finally I found what is the problem.
from ACPI CA release notes:
...
14 May 2008. Summary of changes for version 20080514:
1) ACPI CA Core Subsystem:
Fixed a problem where GPEs were enabled too early during the ACPICA
initialization. This could lead to "handler not installed" errors on s
Hello all.
I have a 4.11 Stable version that has been working without problems
in the last years. We do not need nothing else for the moment but we
are looking to have more speed. It has been running under a double
Pentium III processor with 512MB of ram and it has a disk of 40GB.
I was wond
Walter Venable pisze:
FreeBSD 7.1 upgrade broke my network access, machine is totally
offline (powered-on and I can play inside it at the terminal, but
absolutely 0 network access):
This happened AFTER make kernel but BEFORE make installworld. I think
this implies it's a kernel driver issue.
ht
> effect on control flow, unlike, say, WITNESS, which significantly distorts
> timing. Is there any chance you picked up any of the recent fixes that went
> into RELENG_7 without noticing, and that perhaps one of those did it? With
I'm pretty certian of that - I hav just been changing kernel
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Pete French wrote:
If you have BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER compiled into the kernel, then try pressing
ctrl-alt-break on the console to see if you can drop into the debugger, or
issue a serial break on a serial console.
Well, I added BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER to the kernel config I had whi
> If you have BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER compiled into the kernel, then try pressing
> ctrl-alt-break on the console to see if you can drop into the debugger, or
> issue a serial break on a serial console.
Well, I added BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER to the kernel config I had which contained
all the other stuff (WIT
I asked this question a while ago, but got no answers. I'm trying again
Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in
Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x?
Gunnar Flygt
Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org m
Hi Tom,
I don't know how much documentation there is on this, but if you are
investigating this issue, maybe you would like to contribute/update
some documentation on it?
Royce gave me a link to the tools,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/projects/freebsd-update-server/
reading throug
30 matches
Mail list logo
