Hi!
> > > I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3
> > > shipped with. [...]
> > Basically, the problem is with the matrox board.
> I have run the Matrox G550 under both 6 and 7. I had some problems, but
> not too many. I do need to use xrandr to set up the prop
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:36:23 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3
shipped with. I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2 and have never had mu
Em Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:49:53 -0700
Gé Weijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> The last line in /usr/ports/MOVED is wrong, there's a field missing.
> Replacing the first "|" with "||" seems to fix it.
>
> Gé
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Darrell Betts wrote:
>
> > I upgraded 6.2 to 6.3 f
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Brad Pitney wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:29 AM, peter stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3
shipped with. I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2 and have never had much
trouble with it until the 6 branch
The last line in /usr/ports/MOVED is wrong, there's a field missing.
Replacing the first "|" with "||" seems to fix it.
Gé
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Darrell Betts wrote:
I upgraded 6.2 to 6.3 following the instructions on this page
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/upgrade-freebsd-server-sof
I upgraded 6.2 to 6.3 following the instructions on this page http://
www.cyberciti.biz/faq/upgrade-freebsd-server-software/
Everything went well until I tired portversion -l "<" and I received
this error:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:119:in `fill': MOVED
file format error (P
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > G550's are very old cards, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect
> > that someone doing RC testing would have one installed.
> I missed the original posting, but I had a G550 (I think - may have
> been a 450, but
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:17:25PM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just put together a new box and installed 7-RELEASE on it. Cvsup'd
> RELENG_7 branch and tried makeworld. It keeps blowing up at the same spot:
Are you building world with any -j flags?
> ln -fs libobjc.so.3 /usr/obj/usr/sr
Hi,
Just put together a new box and installed 7-RELEASE on it. Cvsup'd
RELENG_7 branch and tried makeworld. It keeps blowing up at the same spot:
ln -fs libobjc.so.3 /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libobjc.so
===> gnu/lib/libssp (install)
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:36:23 +0100
> From: Kurt Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi!
>
> > I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3
> > shipped with. I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2 and have never had much
> > trouble with it unt
On Monday 17 March 2008 04:10:14 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080317 09:43] wrote:
> >
> > This is not a bug. Don't use untimeout(9) as it is not guaranteed to be
> > reliable. Instead, use callout_*(). Your patch doesn't solve any races
as
> > the driver
Marcel Moolenaar wrote am 17.03.2008 17:28 (localtime):
On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
phk 2008-03-17 10:33:23 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/sys ata.h
sbin/atacontrol atacontrol.8 atacontrol.c
sys/dev/ata a
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:37:52 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPMI is one of those things that's presented as a great idea (and it
> but the actual implementations done by vendors (or at least
> Supermicro) appears to be a complete mess. Very disappointing.
Perhpas we should ha
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
> >>On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg
Hi all,
can someone comment on the state of the hifn(4) driver?
I've recently upgraded my 6.2-STABLE workstation to RELENG_7,
and I'm now experiencing system lockups that seem to be caused
by the hifn(4) driver.
I've got a Soekris vpn1401 card to help with GELI disk en-
cryption. Reading fr
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080317 09:43] wrote:
>
> This is not a bug. Don't use untimeout(9) as it is not guaranteed to be
> reliable. Instead, use callout_*(). Your patch doesn't solve any races as
> the driver detach routine needs to use callout_drain() and not just
> callout_sto
Greetings Dave,
Dave Overton wrote:
I am new to the AMD64 stable branch, so forgive me if this has been beat to
death, but I can't find why this message keeps occurring over and over all
day. FreeBSD 7.0 Stable on AMD x2. It works (or seems to) fine.
+rtfree: 0xff0003635780 has 1 refs
I am new to the AMD64 stable branch, so forgive me if this has been beat to
death, but I can't find why this message keeps occurring over and over all
day. FreeBSD 7.0 Stable on AMD x2. It works (or seems to) fine.
+rtfree: 0xff0003635780 has 1 refs
its a kernel "bold" on the terminal, and
On Friday 14 March 2008 10:41:14 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> We think we tracked down a defect in timeout/untimeout in
> FreeBSD.
>
> We have reduced the problem to the following scenario:
>
> 2+ cpu system, one cpu is running softclock at the same time
> another thread is running on another cpu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
we use a large number of servers with centralized user-accounts in LDAP
for ease of administration. The machines bind to LDAPv3 with TLS, and
PAM accepts logins for ssh checking groupdn. This has been working great
in FreeBSD 4.x, 5.x and 6.x, bu
Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of
moderating this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have the opposite experience. I am amazed at how little spam this
On Monday 17 March 2008, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> Well, I suppose this will eventually get to the original poster.
>
> I too have just gone through this nightmare. But, I short circuited it all.
>
> I went to a clean install of 7.0-RELEASE.
>
> Ah ha. Easy. Nope. The gremlins were waiting.
>
> So
Lawrence Farr wrote:
I couldn't get this to apply cleanly against 7, is it safe to use rev
1.48 on 7? I have 3 machines here that hang whilst dumping and I'd
like to test the patch.
For RELENG_7, I'm using the attached. Apply it from /usr,
Michael
*** src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c.or
> G550's are very old cards, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect
> that someone doing RC testing would have one installed.
I missed the original posting, but I had a G550 (I think - may have
been a 450, but I am fairly sure it was a 550) in my workstation here
until a couple of weeks ago, an
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:16:10PM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
>> The advantage to iLO is that it's the equivalent of KVM-over-IP,
>> supporting virtual media too (read: an ISO image on your laptop/local
>> client machine being used as a CD on the server itself, thus you can
>> install whatever OS yo
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/su
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/su
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Baldwin
> Sent: 14 March 2008 19:46
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Cc: Greg Rivers
> Subject: Re: bin/121684: dump frequently hangs
>
> On Friday 14 March 2008 12:53:22 am Greg R
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Str?m wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
> >>Johan Str?m wrote:
> >>>But..
> >>>http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00553302/c0055330
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:33:20AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
>>> Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00553302/c00553302
Well, I suppose this will eventually get to the original poster.
I too have just gone through this nightmare. But, I short circuited it all.
I went to a clean install of 7.0-RELEASE.
Ah ha. Easy. Nope. The gremlins were waiting.
So basically here's what I did.
When I loaded the new system, I
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 06:40:49PM -0500, Joe Koberg wrote:
Johan Str?m wrote:
But..
http://bizsupport.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00553302/c00553302.pdf
seems
to tell me that in basic mode I can only access BIOS (pre-OS)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:29 AM, peter stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get a working xorg from the mess 6.3
> shipped with. I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2 and have never had much
> trouble with it until the 6 branch was released. My hardware is pretty
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
