On Thursday 01 March 2007 17:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >The problem seems to occur when the acquisition process (called the
> > Recorder) tries to fork off a new child.
>
> Your description and the ps output suggest a filesystem deadlock.
When it happened last time I had no problem running command
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:55:21PM -0600, Greg Barniskis wrote:
>> On our Dell PE2950 units, we had to do the same thing (disable and
>> replace the Broadcom interfaces), and that was running Windows
>> Server 2k3. The problem really seems to be flakiness of the chips or
On 2007-Mar-01 11:48:54 +1030, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The problem seems to occur when the acquisition process (called the Recorder)
>tries to fork off a new child.
Your description and the ps output suggest a filesystem deadlock.
>Does anyone have any suggestions for debuggin
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On our PE800, I had to disable the bge on BIOS and plug in an em-based
NIC card. Made a world of difference in system stability and
performance -- it is actually usable now :-)
On our Dell PE2950 units, we had to do the same thing (disable and
repla
We run a set of meteor and wind radar systems based on FreeBSD and one of them
I am seeing an odd problem that does not occur very often (once a month
perhaps).
The main process we use for gathering data regularly fork()s children off to
process data (at each 30 minute acquisition cycle). The data
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:41:00AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> >Funny thing happened after the last upgrade (upgraded to
> >6-STABLE yesterday): the moinmoin wiki that I've been
> >playing with stopped working. A little fiddling found
> >t
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:55:21PM -0600, Greg Barniskis wrote:
> On our Dell PE2950 units, we had to do the same thing (disable and
> replace the Broadcom interfaces), and that was running Windows
> Server 2k3. The problem really seems to be flakiness of the chips or
> firmware, not necessarily
I had to disbale both bge nics to get the server going. Now I am running
with twin em0 nics. Seems to be very stable for at least 9 days.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Barniskis
Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2007 8:55 AM
To: Vivek Khera
Cc:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On our PE800, I had to disable the bge on BIOS and plug in an em-based
NIC card. Made a world of difference in system stability and
performance -- it is actually usable now :-)
On our Dell PE2950 units, we had to do the same thing (disable and
replace the Broadcom interfa
On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Pretty well the same thing we are seeing. Our interrupt rate is a
bit higher as this is a fairly busy DNS server. I am guessing this
is more an issue with the bge driver then a general network issue
as other similarly loaded boxes with em nic
At 04:20 AM 2/28/2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:54:18PM +1100, Dimuthu Parussalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dmesg output related to bge as follows.
>
> miibus0: on bge0
> brgphy0: on miibus0
> brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX,
> 1000baseTX-FDX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, February 27, 2007 20:18:50 -0800 Tom Samplonius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Feb 27 04:32:49 mars uptimec: The server requested that we do a new
>> login
>> Feb 27 04:33:00 ma
Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Even with libthr the CPU usage is still far too high ...
> I'm currently looking at the code.
Take a look at this post. I also have CPU usage problems and simscan
installed.
http://www.mail-archive.com/toaster@shupp.org/msg04119.html
> Re: [toaster]
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:54:10PM +, Jason Thomson wrote:
> Regarding:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-February/033241.html
>
>
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:50:37PM +, Jason Thomson wrote:
> >
> >
> >Try this (already committed
Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs
Regarding:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-February/033241.html
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:50:37PM +, Jason Thomson wrote:
Try this (already committed to CURRENT as rev. 1.579). I would be very
interesting in getting feedback.
Konstant
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
Hm. I canno
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi all,
Funny thing happened after the last upgrade (upgraded to
6-STABLE yesterday): the moinmoin wiki that I've been
playing with stopped working. A little fiddling found
that I could make it work again by changing the shebang
at the top of /usr/loca
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:54:18PM +1100, Dimuthu Parussalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dmesg output related to bge as follows.
>
> miibus0: on bge0
> brgphy0: on miibus0
> brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX,
> 1000baseTX-FDX, auto
> bge0: Ethernet address: 00:11:25:e9:7
19 matches
Mail list logo