Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Even with libthr the CPU usage is still far too high ... > I'm currently looking at the code.
Take a look at this post. I also have CPU usage problems and simscan installed. http://www.mail-archive.com/toaster@shupp.org/msg04119.html > Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up > Tom Collins > Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:33:52 -0800 > On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: >> One thing to keep in mind, if you are not using the :attach in simcontrol, >> do NOT enable rip mime in simscan as that will cause clamdscan to basically >> scan the message and the attachment twice. >> Clamav does a very good job of scanning encoded content and attachments >> all by itself. No need to duplicate effort. > I recently took a look at ripmime to see if it had a setting that would > simply > dump the attachment filenames without actually creating the attachments. It, > unfortunately, does not. I haven't looked at the source to see if it would be > possible to build a modified version to accomplish my goals or not. > I guess I could modify my simscan to run ripmime, look at the attachment > filenames, and then delete them all before calling clamav. OR, I could > simply pass the message file to clamav instead of having it scan the > entire directory. > In the case of large attachments, it's a big waste of CPU cycles to scan > the entire message twice. I might just skip attachment blocking at this > point, > and hope that clamav will catch all of the scr and pif crap. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
