On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 20. June 2005 19:17, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > Works here on a month or two old -current. ?I'm using
> > > > /usr/local/ant/docs/appendix_e.pdf as a test (it's 60 pages or so).
> > >
> > > Crashes for me:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there hs been a workaround solution discussed at
http://forums.cpanel.net/showthread.php?t=40052 too
by applying this
http://forums.cpanel.net/showthread.php?p=190310#post190310 should fix
the problem
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Just as a heads-up, spamd currently will not do DNS lookups (meaning
Just as a heads-up, spamd currently will not do DNS lookups (meaning no
RBL's). This is due to a bug in p5-Net-DNS that was introduced in either
version .49 or .50. I downloaded http://lnk.nu/freebsd.org/3b1.gz (go to
http://lnk.nu/freebsd.org/3b2/ and hit the tarball link at the bottom)
and extrac
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the last 6 month i really think that if you don't need something
high-end scsi then you should go for SATA.
Fair enough if you don't need high-end yoy shuld go lowend. But read on..
There are test
Steve Roome wrote:
I posted these results and anything else that went with this thread to
the freebsd-performance mailing list.
-current proved a slightly better performer for us, but not enough to
bring it even close to the performance we get with gentoo.
Off the top of my head the select key
I see a patch has been submitted to add a 'don't format' option for
people like me who use such things as jail disks... but it
was last changed in 2004 and is still open.
Problem Report bin/57641.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Can you please build kernel with debugging and obtain a crashdump?
High activity on the box today caused us to be able to crash it again
within 9 hours. I configured all steps per the developers handbook, but
when I went to do savecore, it said "no dumps".
It appears the machine is complet
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:26:17PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
>
>
> >It's -current only as it requires incompatable API changes to the
> >interface code.
> >
> >
> >
> I compiled WPA_Supplicant yesterday on 5.4. But
>
> Is there any plan back-port it to -stable?
No. WPA support req
Here's a neat little script you can run from cron or commandline. I use
it to update the ports tree and the source tree for 5-STABLE. Feel free
to change the cvsup logging to suit (I don't log the ports, but I do log
important STABLE src stuff). Also, use the correct country for mirrors.
Yo
* Simon L. Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0652 20:52]:
> On 2005.06.24 10:58:36 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> >
> > I just manually patched up my ruby18 install and tried to tell
> > portaudit that the local port is now clean, but it doesn't want to
> > know:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rasputnik # p
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> The best thing to do is narrow down what kernel changes caused this
> (build kernels from various cvs update dates to zero in on the cause).
I'm trying to find out more about this errors.
Today I compiled:
2005-05-27: ok, it seems (I am using it now and want to
On 2005.06.24 10:58:36 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
>
> I just manually patched up my ruby18 install and tried to tell
> portaudit that the local port is now clean, but it doesn't want to
> know:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rasputnik # portaudit
> Affected package: ruby-1.8.2_3
> Type of p
Hi,
I have been working with a Dell PE 2850 here recently and I've been
having some weird problems. I noticed a few previous posts about a
PE 2850 and some problems, but I think my problems are slightly
different, however somewhat similar.
I'm setting up my PE 2850 (dual 2.8 xeon, w/ 4G
Not to sound like a broken record, but I had another ttwakeup crash last
night. Is this more of a problem with SMP systems? Would it be more stable
without SMP? Or without ACPI? I'll try anything at this point.
Mitch Parks
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159
#1 0xc05357d7 in boot (howto=260) at /usr
On 28/06/2005, at 2:16 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On June 27, 2005 05:52 am, Joao Paulo Marques Mattos wrote:
Brian Candler wrote:
[This is with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE]
set in /boot/device.hints
hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
FreeBSD 4.x supports device.hints? I thought that was a 5.x feature.
S
On Monday, 20. June 2005 19:17, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > Works here on a month or two old -current. I'm using
> > > /usr/local/ant/docs/appendix_e.pdf as a test (it's 60 pages or so).
> >
> > Crashes for me:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:127:~ > env LIBPTHREAD_SYSTEM_SCOPE=1 kpdf
> > 'http://drtc.i
Hi!
>>> [This is with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE]
>> set in /boot/device.hints
>> hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
>
> FreeBSD 4.x supports device.hints? I thought that was a 5.x feature.
>
You're right.
"12.5 Device Hints
Note: This is a FreeBSD 5.0 and later feature which does not exist in earlier
versi
On June 27, 2005 05:52 am, Joao Paulo Marques Mattos wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote:
> > [This is with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE]
> set in /boot/device.hints
> hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
FreeBSD 4.x supports device.hints? I thought that was a 5.x feature.
> > So I tried putting
> > hint.atkbd.0.flags=
On Mon Jul 20, (I was reading the web archive) Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> With respect to Mysql performance, I would suspect threading or
> threading/kernel interaction as the culprit. (That reminds me, I
> don't recall seeing the original poster re-doing the tests with
> 6.0-CURRENT - that would be in
> On 6/27/05, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 June 2005 19:32, Sergey Spivak wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > portinstall is a ruby program which comes with portupgrade
> > >
> > > "portinstall" = "portupgrade -N"
> >
> > Oh. Makes me wonder why 'portinstall' exists at all.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:58:56PM +0100, Tony Byrne wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> M> believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing
> M> firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and
> M> spit this out:
>
> M> ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086
On Monday 27 June 2005 14:14, Brian Candler wrote:
> > set in /boot/device.hints
> >
> > hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
>
> I tried that, and it didn't work.
I've tested it again, giving exactly your suggestion in exactly that file, and
it doesn't work.
However, on another machine, where I set the fla
There is another alternative to just doing the cvsup...
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Maher Mohamed wrote:
how can i upgrade my cvsup weekly with an auto way?
You should use crondaemon. Place the following line to the end of
/etc/crontab:
15 4 * * 6 rootcvsup /s
> set in /boot/device.hints
>
> hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
I tried that, and it didn't work. Well actually I put the setting
in /boot/loader.conf rather than /boot/device.hints, but AFAICT they are the
same:
$ cd /usr/src/sys/boot
$ find . -type f | xargs grep device.hints
./forth/loader.conf:l
set in /boot/device.hints
hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x0"
[]´s
JP-Ux
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Candler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 9:38 AM
Subject: atkbd: changing flags at boot time
[This is with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE]
I would like to arrange that the
[This is with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE]
I would like to arrange that the ATA keyboard works even if the machine is
booted without a keyboard, but one is subsequently plugged in. My
understanding is that the default behaviour of probing for the keyboard is
set here in the kernel configuration:
devi
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:45:35AM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to make a bsdextended mac policy and when I add the following
> rule, I can't login with a simple user:
>
> ugidfw add subject not uid root object uid root mode rx
I think you'll need to allow stat permission too
Hello,
I try to make a bsdextended mac policy and when I add the following
rule, I can't login with a simple user:
ugidfw add subject not uid root object uid root mode rx
This rule is for protecting root's files from others in any case.
And I've got the following message:
/libexec/ld-els.so.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:28:34PM -0400, Gary Mu1der wrote:
G> Can someone confirm that the following stack trace is showing the same
G> problem, or not?
G> I can reproduce the problem with the custom kernel config included below
G> (which is basically GENERIC stripped of devices I don't have or
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> looking at the specs between two cards, the SATA card(s) seem to rate
> ~100-150MB/s on each channel (if I'm reading right), with both the 3Ware
> and ICP cards having 4 individual channels ... looking at the SCSI
> cards, they are rated at 320MB/s, but that is total fo
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:01:09AM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
M> About three weeks ago, I upgraded my 5.3-RELEASE boxes to 5.4-RELEASE.
M> I also turned on procmail globally on our mail server. Here is our
M> current FreeBSD server setup:
M>
M> URANUS - primary ldap
M> CALIBAN - secondary
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 17:42 -0700, Leland wrote:
> I thought the '-p1' would have the least number of changes to test cvsup.
> Changed my 'base' and 'prefix' to match your cvs-supfile, thanks.
>
> Using a fresh 4.11 installed all, running the following cvs-supfile still
> gets 28988
> "C " entr
>It's -current only as it requires incompatable API changes to the
>interface code.
>
>
>
I compiled WPA_Supplicant yesterday on 5.4. But
Is there any plan back-port it to -stable?
Eitarou
>
>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:13:04 +0400
"Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > looking at the specs between two cards, the SATA card(s) seem to rate
> > ~100-150MB/s on each channel (if I'm reading right), with both the
> > 3Ware and ICP cards having
34 matches
Mail list logo
