Thanks Scott,
I have since installed AbiWord but will still need to install Java for
those silly java applets on some websites, this is a single user
workstation so the vulnerability wont affect me because i dont allow
anyone in. Thats what the server next to the desk is for :-D.
Regards,
Jayton
What BIOS revision are you running in your 2850? Make sure all your
firmware is up to date. I had problems with an slightly older Dell
2650 trying to install FreeBSD until I flashed the latest RAID
controller firmware. If this doesn't help, try running some
diagnostics on the hardware. Dell has
On 05/31/05 18:36, Bruce Burden wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:51:57PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
There's no mention of in release notes but its in the source tree.
Does anyone know the current state of play?
Last I heard, it hadn't been 64 bit proofed, and the primary person
was swamped
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>From: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Wed, 2005-May-18 06:43:37 -0600, Elliot Finley wrote:
>> >Had the system lock up again. This is with the new ATA mkIII patches on
>> >http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA.
>> >
>> >I didn't get the cras
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:51:57PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> There's no mention of in release notes but its in the source
> tree. Does anyone know the current state of play?
>
Last I heard, it hadn't been 64 bit proofed, and the
primary person was swamped, and asking for help.
There's no mention of in release notes but its in the source
tree. Does anyone know the current state of play?
Steve
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In t
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 11:29 -0700, Derek Kuliński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I noticed following message in the log:
>
> > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > kdb_backtrace(c07163b8,2,c661994c,0,22) at kdb_backtrace+0x2e
> > getdirtybuf(d109ebac,0,1,c661994c,1) at getdirtybuf+0x2b
> > flush_deplist(c282f4cc
Hi,
I've read about some ATA DMA timeout problems recently here.
I just want to tell you, I've got same problems recently.
I had to install the kernel.old back to get rid of severe
problems.
Affected kernel version:
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
Last known working version
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2005, 20:22 +0100 schrieb Jayton Garnett:
> How do I go about compiling these now? I only need it for openoffice and
> unfortunately there are no packages for openoffice and dont want to
> install it without java as i am not sure what the out come will be :-s
Look there:
h
Jon Dama wrote:
Yes, but surely you weren't bridging gigabit and 100Mbit before?
Did you try my suggestion about binding the IP address of the NFS server
to the 100Mbit side?
Yeah. Unfortunately networking on the server fell apart when I did that.
Traffic was still passed and I could g
Jon Dama wrote:
Yes, but surely you weren't bridging gigabit and 100Mbit before?
Did you try my suggestion about binding the IP address of the NFS server
to the 100Mbit side?
Yeah. Unfortunately networking on the server fell apart when I did that.
Traffic was still passed and I could g
> Firewire, usb all the NIC's except em and removed all RAID and SCSI
> controllers to make sure nothing would interfere.
Yes, but if you do not change the usbd_enable="YES" to "NO" in
/etc/rc.conf, it will load a kernel module which may trigger the
panic.
> I tried to boot with the AMD64 CD but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Jayton Garnett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently installed freebsd 5.4 and tried many times to install
> the native freebsd jdk (1.4 & 1.5) and wont install as there is a
> security vulnerability in the lin
Hello,
I have recently installed freebsd 5.4 and tried many times to install
the native freebsd jdk (1.4 & 1.5) and wont install as there is a
security vulnerability in the linux jdk's and other jdk's.
How do I go about compiling these now? I only need it for openoffice and
unfortunately there a
Yes, but surely you weren't bridging gigabit and 100Mbit before?
Did you try my suggestion about binding the IP address of the NFS server
to the 100Mbit side?
-Jon
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> Jon Dama wrote:
>
> >Try switching to TCP NFS.
> >
> >a 100MBit interface cannot keep
Yes, but surely you weren't bridging gigabit and 100Mbit before?
Did you try my suggestion about binding the IP address of the NFS server
to the 100Mbit side?
-Jon
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> Jon Dama wrote:
>
> >Try switching to TCP NFS.
> >
> >a 100MBit interface cannot keep
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I assume he's not using inetd(8) for ssh (which is not a
> > good ide ain general, and it's not the default anyway).
> > Note that sshd(8) supports hosts_access(3) directly without
> > the help of inetd(8
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I assume he's not using inetd(8) for ssh (which is not a
> good ide ain general, and it's not the default anyway).
> Note that sshd(8) supports hosts_access(3) directly without
> the help of inetd(8).
I thought someone had specified inetd, but looking a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Access control based on the reverse lookup of an IP address is a
dangerous idea in general. Anyone who manages their own reverse DNS
could bypass the security simply by creating a DNS entry. If someone
controls the in-addr.arpa zone for a particular IP range, they can ma
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
>
> What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
> TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
Access control based on the reverse looku
I've had the same problem and I think everybody using recent FreeBSD has
it. The culprit seems to be the following line in tubo.c:
if (kill(PID,SIGCONT) == 0) return TRUE;
I am not sure about other OS's and what POSIX mandates in this case, but
FreeBSD 5.4 allows to send signals to child process
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I understand it, sshd actually accepts connections
> > > prior to checking hosts.allow?
> >
> > Yes, the connection is accepted first, because there is
>
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > As I understand it, sshd actually accepts connections
> > > prior to checking hosts.allow?
> >
> > Yes, the connection is accepted fi
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, sshd actually accepts connections
> > prior to checking hosts.allow?
>
> Yes, the connection is accepted first, because there is
> no information available about it before it is accepted.
With the kernel I removed all non-required devices
Firewire, usb all the NIC's except em and removed all RAID and SCSI
controllers to make sure nothing would interfere.
I tried to boot with the AMD64 CD but with no success, the machine just
hangs when it tries to load the CD, still trying to work
Jon Dama wrote:
Try switching to TCP NFS.
a 100MBit interface cannot keep up with a 1GBit interface in a bridge
configuration. Therefore, in the long run, at full-bore you'd expect to
drop 9 out of every 10 ethernet frames.
MTU is 1500 therefore 1K works (it fits in one frame), 2K doesn't (yo
Jon Dama wrote:
Try switching to TCP NFS.
a 100MBit interface cannot keep up with a 1GBit interface in a bridge
configuration. Therefore, in the long run, at full-bore you'd expect to
drop 9 out of every 10 ethernet frames.
MTU is 1500 therefore 1K works (it fits in one frame), 2K doesn't (yo
Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Robul wrote:
> > Ivan Voras wrote:
> > > What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
> > > TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
> >
> > /etc/hosts.allow
> > man 5 hosts_access
>
> How safe is it?
Hello Ivan,
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 4:43:16 PM, si pisal:
> Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
> What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
> TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
you can use AllowUsers sshd_config directive
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> I've run into an issue that has me stumped. Anything that I link against
> libpthread on my FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE/i386 installation will segfault as
> soon as it tries making use of the threads.
I may be hitting a manifestation of the same problem. With
> I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE and upgraded to -STABLE on a DELL
> PE2850.
>
> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Wed May 25 23:43:12 BST 2005
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.22-MHz 686-class CPU)
> real memory = 5100273664 (4864 MB)
> avail memory = 4189892608 (3995 MB)
> MPTable:
> Free
Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
No. That would required the IPFW code to perform reverse
DNS lookups, which isn't really feasable.
(In theory you could write a small filter program that
receives the ssh setup packets via an IP
Igor Robul wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
/etc/hosts.allow
man 5 hosts_access
How safe is it? As I understand it, sshd actually accepts connections
prior to checking hos
Ivan Voras wrote:
Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
/etc/hosts.allow
man 5 hosts_access
___
fre
Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Hello Florian,
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 9:18:33 AM, you made these points:
> Sorry, my mistake we misunderstood:
> installed the mod_perl2 port.
> And I added to the httpd.conf:
> LoadModule perl_module libexec/apache2/mod_perl.so
> PerlModule Apache2
^^ - remove this line, this is obsoleted
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE and upgraded to -STABLE on a DELL
PE2850.
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Wed May 25 23:43:12 BST 2005
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.22-MHz 686-class CPU)
real memory = 5100273664 (4864 MB)
avail memory = 4189892608 (3995 MB)
MPTable:
FreeBSD/SMP: Mult
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE and upgraded to -STABLE on a DELL
PE2850.
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Wed May 25 23:43:12 BST 2005
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.22-MHz 686-class CPU)
real memory = 5100273664 (4864 MB)
avail memory = 4189892608 (3995 MB)
MPTable:
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiproc
Sorry, my mistake we misunderstood:
installed the mod_perl2 port.
And I added to the httpd.conf:
LoadModule perl_module libexec/apache2/mod_perl.so
PerlModule Apache2
Alias /perl/ /data/chroot/www/perl/
SetHandler perl-script
PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry
PerlOptions +ParseHeaders
Healthy living for everyday life.
http://tpb.s7v3ebslpka0eta.visional72d3.com
It is easier to believe than to doubt.
Love is my Sword, Goodness my Armor, And Humor my Shield.
All professions are conspiracies against the laity.
___
free
31-May-2005 13:23:51.045 general: error: /usr/src/lib/bind/
dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/adb.c:1439: unexpected error:
31-May-2005 13:23:51.045 general: error: isc_mutex_init failed in
new_adbfind()
31-May-2005 13:23:51.891 general: error: /usr/src/lib/bind/
dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dn
> On 31/05/2005, at 3:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> 31-May-2005 13:23:51.045 general: error: /usr/src/lib/bind/
> >> dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/adb.c:1439: unexpected error:
> >> 31-May-2005 13:23:51.045 general: error: isc_mutex_init failed in
> >> new_adbfind()
> >> 31-May-2
42 matches
Mail list logo
