On Mon, 9 May 2005 07:02:07 +0200
Zoran Kolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a question before 5.4:
> what would be iso 1 on release?
> Live system or instalation?
Both.
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org maili
Just a question before 5.4:
what would be iso 1 on release?
Live system or instalation?
Best regards
Zoran
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On 05/08/05 14:29, David Gurvich wrote:
cdrom /boot/loader from 5.3 has no problem. However, after updating world
from kernel, /boot/loader is replaced with cvs version. This one goes into
endless cycle of reboots. When replaced with /boot/loader from cdrom boots
normally.
Are you setting CPU
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Adrian Steinmann wrote:
> I've been running RELENG_5 -D2005/04/25UTC on a CF-based system
> (PC Engines WRAP.1C v1.03; 640 KB Base Memory; 130048 KB Extended Memory)
> CF: 01F0 Master 848A Hitachi XX.V.3.4.0.0
> Phys C/H/S 978/8/32 Log C/H/S 978/8/32
>
> ...
> CPU: Geo
Don't crosspost both -current and -stable; your problem does not affect
-current.
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have rebuilt the world and kernel this morning.
The commit causing this problem has been backed out. Please cvsup and try
again.
--
Doug White
Hi,
usually I hate replying to myself, but
this time it seems to be good news :-)
The describe behaviour (see below) is
no longer reproducable with the latest
5.4-STABLE as of today (8.5.2005, around
18:00 CEST).
So thanx to whoever fixed this ;-)
Regards,
Holger
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:38:5
cdrom /boot/loader from 5.3 has no problem. However, after updating world
from kernel, /boot/loader is replaced with cvs version. This one goes into
endless cycle of reboots. When replaced with /boot/loader from cdrom boots
normally.
___
freebsd-sta
Thus spake Dag-Erling Smørgrav ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [08/05/05 11:08]:
: Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > I can understand listing nocona under AMD64 architecture, but isn't it an
: > Intel CPU? Am I missing something in thinking it should be listed under
: > "Intel CPUs"?
:
: Correct.
On Sat, 07 May 2005 00:38:15 -0500
Jonathan Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I think ati is a generic name that gets you radeon, r128, etc.), but
> radeon is the correct choice. If it doesn't work you should file a
> bug.
Done. see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3242
--
Regar
Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
Hello,
I get the following for a whole bunch of out dated ports on my system. This is
taken from autoconf, but it's basicly the same for all other ports.
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting for autoconf-2.59_2
=> Checksum OK for autocon
On Sat, 07 May 2005 00:38:15 -0500
Jonathan Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Support for your chipset was added at the end of March, so it
> definitely should be in 6.8.99.5:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827
Yes, I can see it defined there. Hmm, it doesn't get detected. :-/
Hi,
Just a followup, the modules are also not respecting the
command line defines. This is what I've got which is totally wrong
since -Wl statements are meant for gcc not ld.
ld -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -d -warn-common
-r -d -o acpi.kld dsfield.o dsinit.
Hi,
I was doing my often world build when something came up.
$ make buildworld
just fine
$ make buildkernel
not so good
$ make buildkernel -V CFLAGS
-Os -pipe -march=athlon-xp -falign-functions -falign-jumps -fno-strict-aliasing
-fomit-frame-pointer -fpeel-loops -freorder-blocks -fu
On Sun, 8 May 2005 22:24, Holger Kipp wrote:
> whenever I want to mount a DVD-RAM, I have
> a little problem because the corresponding
> device entry (eg cd0a, acd0a) does not
> exist. This will be created after trying
> to mount /dev/cd0 instead of /dev/cd0a, but
> I am not sure if this is the cor
Hi list,
forwarding to freebsd-stable (probably the right place anyway),
since I got no further responses on freebsd-questions.
Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/5/2005 19:43, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >the day before yesterday I experienced my first
> >panic on 5.4-STABLE. Build and cvsup'ed
Hi,
whenever I want to mount a DVD-RAM, I have
a little problem because the corresponding
device entry (eg cd0a, acd0a) does not
exist. This will be created after trying
to mount /dev/cd0 instead of /dev/cd0a, but
I am not sure if this is the correct behaviour ;-)
# ls /dev/acd*
/dev/acd0
Jan Sebosik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I`ve empty HDD - /dev/ad1. My system(freebsd of course:) is on
> /dev/ad0. I want to move completly my freebsd 5.4 installation from
> ad0 to ad1. Couse I don`t want to mess up something, is there some way
> how I can safely do this ?
The FreeBSD FAQ cove
Hi,
I have a very interesting behaviour here. During boot, I can use
the keyboard (eg on the initial boot menu), but if I press a key
after the message
"Starting sshd"
was printed (and before the login prompt), I get
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault v
Hi
I`ve empty HDD - /dev/ad1. My system(freebsd of course:) is on /dev/ad0.
I want to move completly my freebsd 5.4 installation from ad0 to ad1.
Couse I don`t want to mess up something, is there some way how I can
safely do this ?
Best regards, Jan Sebosik
_
Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can understand listing nocona under AMD64 architecture, but isn't it an
> Intel CPU? Am I missing something in thinking it should be listed under
> "Intel CPUs"?
Correct. I pointed this out when the commit was made, but apparently
noone listened.
DES
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 11:37 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> Looks like there are problems with the recent patch to fix tty panics.
> It seems to cause loss of keyboard input during the boot-up phase,
> including the point where it asks for what shell to use if you try
> booting to single-user.
>
> We'll
21 matches
Mail list logo
