On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:33:19PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:21:15 -0700
> >From: Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I still agree. My -current machines run find, and I refuse to run -stable on
> >an SMP machine.
>
> For whatever it may be worth, my "build mach
Hello Antonin
I've tested also serveral time but with no success. Afterwoods I used the
original SUN cd-rom. Do you have one?
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:35:46PM +0100 Ing. Antonín Walter wrote:
> maybe I did not use the correct word in english, but
>
> on using the port you have suggested it f
>Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:21:15 -0700
>From: Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I still agree. My -current machines run find, and I refuse to run -stable on
>an SMP machine.
For whatever it may be worth, my "build machine" (which is one of the
machines on which I track both -STABLE and -CURRENT d
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:14:08PM -0800, Brady Montz wrote:
>
> Here's an update ...
>
> I'm fairly certain there's a kernel bug at work here. Last night I rebooted
> to linux (which is on the same disk), and ran batch compiles all
> night long without any troubles. In comparision, I can't com
:For a while I have been treating this as an annoyance, but I thought it
:would be wise to investigate if something larger and more nefarious might
:be being indicated by this.
:
:I have a mixed environment of mainly Linux boxen, with a dozen or so
:FreeBSD machines (For when we need the kind of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Marius M. Rex"
writes:
>
>><118>Dec 15 22:40:19 cc117 /kernel: nfs server netapp1:/vol/members: not
>>responding
>><118>Dec 15 22:40:19 cc117 /kernel: nfs server netapp1:/vol/members: is
>>alive again
...
>Has anyone else seen these kinds of persistent NFS errors
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Brady Montz wrote:
> Richard Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 10:59:13AM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > > I am experiencing the same crashes on my new machine (ATA100 IDE
> > > drive): they appeared when I noticed tha
For a while I have been treating this as an annoyance, but I thought it
would be wise to investigate if something larger and more nefarious might
be being indicated by this.
I have a mixed environment of mainly Linux boxen, with a dozen or so
FreeBSD machines (For when we need the kind of networ
Of course, one could always use "file" on each binary to see what the
differences are. But that would be too easy.
Sigh... the new tea I tried must not have enough caffiene.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:53:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:45:13 -0500
> >From: Sa
That is true, however I can't explain why netstat -a only gives the
active UNIX domain sockets info, while the unstripped version reports
Active Internet connections (including servers) as it's supposed to..
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in
>Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:45:13 -0500
>From: Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Something is rather odd here, and I'm at a loss to explain it. Checking
>dates does in fact show a Dec 17th datestamp, but comparing the /usr/bin
>executables against /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin executables shows they a
Your issue is basically this?
pedicular~;ls -lai /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/xargs/
total 26
309805 drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel 512 Dec 12 12:24 .
238112 drwxr-xr-x 211 root wheel 6656 Dec 12 11:19 ..
310095 -rw-r--r--1 root wheel 884 Dec 12 11:58 .depend
310504 -rwxr-xr-x1 root whe
Something is rather odd here, and I'm at a loss to explain it. Checking
dates does in fact show a Dec 17th datestamp, but comparing the /usr/bin
executables against /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin executables shows they are
different in size, but datestamps are the same, Dec 17. This whole
thing starte
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vivek Khera writes:
>
>>>"n" == nsayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>n> One of my machines has been prone to having one of its filesystems curdle
>>n> for an unknown reason.
>>
>>n> I have ever only exp
14 matches
Mail list logo
