Of course, one could always use "file" on each binary to see what the differences are. But that would be too easy.
Sigh... the new tea I tried must not have enough caffiene. On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:53:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > >Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:45:13 -0500 > >From: Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Something is rather odd here, and I'm at a loss to explain it. Checking > >dates does in fact show a Dec 17th datestamp, but comparing the /usr/bin > >executables against /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin executables shows they are > >different in size, but datestamps are the same, Dec 17. This whole > >thing started with a funny netstat output. Looking at file sizes, I see > >in /usr/bin, netstat is: > > >-r-xr-sr-x 1 root kmem 91008 Dec 17 13:06 /usr/bin/netstat > > >and in /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat: > > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 99182 Dec 17 12:24 netstat > > > >Knowing it has not been installed, but it does give proper output. A > >view of the script of the install does not show any problems... > > > FYI: > > m133[1] file /usr/bin/netstat /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/netstat > /usr/bin/netstat: setgid ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel >80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped > /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/netstat: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, >version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped > m133[2] ls -l !:* > ls -l /usr/bin/netstat /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/netstat > -r-xr-sr-x 1 root kmem 91008 Dec 17 05:58 /usr/bin/netstat > -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 99182 Dec 17 05:38 >/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/netstat > m133[3] > > > (I.e., the new one *is* installed; it's stripped, while the one in > /usr/obj is not stripped, thus accounting for the size difference.) > > Cheers, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I believe it would be irresponsible (and thus, unethical) for me to advise, > recommend, or support the use of any product that is or depends on any > Microsoft product for any purpose other than personal amusement. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Michael Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] my FreeBSD column: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
