On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. The value of diff in chgsbsize was always positive
> (unsigned - unsigned results in an unsigned value).
> This causes bogus values in ui_sbsize.
>
> 2. chgsbsize was not called as when the 3-way tcp handshake
> for incoming connect
The news that was posted this morning was correct. 4.1 is back.
I just finished a complete upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 that was
entire remote.
gary
--
Gary D. Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public service Unix
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
>> Original Message <<
On 8/31/00, 10:21:22 PM, "Chad R. Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: downgrading to 3.4:
> As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 11:00:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> * Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [00
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:23:11AM +0300, Roman Shterenzon wrote:
> Hello,
> There's this variable that some ports rely on: XFREE86_VERSION
> For example the Mesa port.
> So, because I've installed the XFree86-4 from ports (it supports my
> graphics card) I set it in the /etc/make.conf as:
> XFRE
As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 11:00:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> * Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 10:17] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
Hi
Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the
>>>
auth 254c24bc subscribe freebsd-stable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
* Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 11:08] wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 11:00:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 10:17] wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Would there be a problem to
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 11:00:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 10:17] wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the
> > > sources from the existing
* Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 10:17] wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the
> > sources from the existing 4.1 Stable?
> >
> > I try to cvsup with RELENG_3_4 but I do not see any re
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the
> sources from the existing 4.1 Stable?
>
> I try to cvsup with RELENG_3_4 but I do not see any receipt of
> sources
You want RELENG_3.
- jim
--
jim mock <[EMAIL
Arnout Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > > Checking procedure is simple: load kernel, boot, then telnet from outside.
> > ssh from outside will do it too (as I discovered this morning).
>
> ANy network connection will d
Hi
Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the sources
from the existing 4.1 Stable?
I try to cvsup with RELENG_3_4 but I do not see any receipt of sources
Theo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > As commented on freebsd-current, this seems to have hit the -CURRENT
> > kernel at the same time. Someone should *not* have MFC'd some change
> > immediately. Not clear who yet. I'm suspicious of the sbappend() changes
> > that have been going in recently.
13 matches
Mail list logo
