As I recall, Jim Mock wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 11:00:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> * Jim Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000831 10:17] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 at 18:06:40 +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Would there be a problem to downgrade to 3.4 stable from the
>>>> sources from the existing 4.1 Stable?
>>>>
>>>> I try to cvsup with RELENG_3_4 but I do not see any receipt of
>>>> sources
>>>
>>> You want RELENG_3.
>>
>> not really, if he wants 3.4-release he wants RELENG_3_4_0_RELEASE
>> if he wants 3-stable then RELENG_3 is correct
>
> He asked for stable :-) Read the original message again.
Actually, he asked for "3.4 stable", a non-entity. So the question
becomes did he have a reason for asking for 3.4, or would 3-STABLE
(pretty much 3.5.1) be what he thought he was asking for.
Alfred was pretty much on, but probably not understandable to Theo.
-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
