support info
but so far all I find is that notice. I don't find the hardware support
list anywhere.
Thanks.
Dick Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its files
and yet, ports like Drupal or WordPress make the files rwx for the owner
(www) as well as the
I run a ZFS on root FreeBSD system. I know I can backup with snapshots
but I want a dump/restore action because I want to transfer this system
to a UFS virtual FreeBSD machine.
My question is: will dump / (root) make a dump of *ALL* other directories?
yanta# df -h
Filesystem
Op 7-2-2012 12:23, Vincent Hoffman schreef:
On 07/02/2012 11:00, dick wrote:
I run a ZFS on root FreeBSD system. I know I can backup with snapshots
but I want a dump/restore action because I want to transfer this
system to a UFS virtual FreeBSD machine.
My question is: will dump / (root) make a
On 26 Mar Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:24:42PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting desperate. First I couldn't compile just a gnome
> > package. OK, it could be missed.. But now I want to compile the new
> >
I want to change my apache webserver to a ssl-version.
Do I deinstall everything first? PHP, MySQL, phpBB2, mod_security and apache? Or
is there a way to make the switch easier than that?
Will just a reinstall of apache itself suffice?
Thxs
--
I try to install freebsd-5.4 on a brandnew 250G seagate baracuda 3250823A
Sysinstall states the drive geomery is wrong and chooses a new value.
It ALSO states to fill in the values the *bios* thinks the drive is.
So here's my dilemma:
fbsd values: 30401/255/16 gives 238472MB (almost ok)
bios val
I wrote:
So here's my dilemma:
fbsd values: 30401/255/16 gives 238472MB (almost ok)
bios values: 65535/255/16 gives 514072MB (totally wrong)
Can the bios be so wrong?
The manufactorer stes this on its website:
Configuration/Organization
Discs/Heads / / / /
Bytes per Sector 512
Logical CHS
s not too hard ;-)
> Note that in my opinion the native FreeBSD drivers are a lot better.
What drivers? The ones that don't exist for the card?
In my opinion the SB Audigy is a very common card that should have
been supported long ago. On the other hand, the OSS drivers are very good.
--
* the movie in a good resolution and all, the
answer probably will be "NO, you can't do that"
You're videocard is not "good enough" for a fast X driver and your
processor needs an upgrade to at least a P3-300 or up.
--
dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289C
ollow up message apologizing for the off-topic nature
> of the previous message. For whatever reason, *that* message didn't
> make it to the list...
FWIW, I did not mind reading your message. It was well written, so
unless it would become an "endless (sub) thread" people could b
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-questions/817357904d84cd1e47a2ecea977498053e7e7f69
>
>
> You can also visit your membership page at
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/dick%40nagual.st
>
>
> On your membership page, you
Does anybody run Codeweavers crossover Office on FreeBSD?
I know it rusnb very well on linux and would like to run it on fbsd too
(if at all possible). If it is possible, can someone explain to me how
to install the package on my fbsd-4.9R?
--
dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:48:22 -0500
Dan Pelleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anybody run Codeweavers crossover Office on FreeBSD?
> > I know it rusnb very well on linux and would like to run it on fbsd
> &g
l access to the machine, these
> security measures are _useless_. A hostile user could take out the
> harddisk, put it in a machine where he has a root account and read all
> the disk's contents (unless it's encrypted).
You're right here but I get the feeling this is beside the po
by any
limewire connections. But ymmv.
> When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: "Never
> use Limewire, or anything like it."
You can also say: use them but don't connect them to the net.
I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad!
--
Dick H
nerability or a similar flaw
> because it's designed with security in mind.
Not only with security. Also with lack of possiblities.
> Sendmail never was.
But it is still the most used mta worldwide.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv103 ++
+
d their unix is damn slow compared to FreeBSD.
These kinds of personal (subjective) remarks are FUD if you don't
deliver the test results.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv103 ++
+ All that's really worth doing is
with ZFS. (and NO, this is not all on Sun
hardware).
I for one will never go back to filesystems like UFS/UFS2.
My data is quite safe on ZFS; my systems are fast; backups are a snap
with snapshots; the list of PROs is long, very long (and all this for a
still young filesystem...)
--
Dick Hoogend
ou mean FreeBSD jails - yes it runs fine, i use them on 6.3p1
I think it's obvious he means running freebsd as a guest OS on some
kind of VM (VMWare, VirtualBox)
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
to _not_ see all the annoying flash-based ads.
And for me it's a handicap. It's like looking to the net through
glasses that are to dark to see all. I think it's a pity fbsd people
tend to ignore modern internet. Flash (or flash-like) webcontent will
not go away. Not for quite a while
x27;s. Lots of us are 'good' people
y'know. All mail coming from one of my servers is clean. Period.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
i-spam
system.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> dump the root partition:
>
> dump -0 -a -C 8 -h 0 -L -u -f - / |gzip
> >/where/to/put/root-0-20080409.gz
OK. Right. And what is exactly the command for restore?
Something like "gunzip dumpfile.gz | restore rf dumpfile"
Or what. Compressing is nice but the use of gzip is
rted. That's a major problem in these
modern times, although lots of fbsd people tend to say it is not.
That's not everyday's live however. FreeBSD does not make the web.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
_
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:16:34 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
h the
ability to boot off ZFS root. Production servers need to be well (no
thoroughly) tested ;-)
The best stable (production) server with ZFS is solaris-10u5
If you want to boot off ZFS, S10u6 will support that.
But these versions too need lots of ram. I think fbsd has a lighter
footprint.
--
Dick Hoo
on't execurate. For a webserver on zfs 4GB is more than enough.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
scheduling on Solaris.
> maybe that's their 32-64 hardware threads capable chip is advertised
> so much? :)
Don't write about things you don't know.
*Maybe's* don't help.
You don't have to like solaris but don't troll about it, please.
Both systems have their
emory and CPU eater.
Your entitled to your opinion, but please try to base it on some facts.
ZFS is herre to stay. You better get used to it. at least you could try
to work with it before you make up an opinion. Have you -any- idea at
all what this FS is capable off?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/G
Op 7-2-2012 15:18, William Brown schreef:
On 07/02/2012, at 22:25, dick wrote:
Op 7-2-2012 12:23, Vincent Hoffman schreef:
On 07/02/2012 11:00, dick wrote:
I run a ZFS on root FreeBSD system. I know I can backup with snapshots
but I want a dump/restore action because I want to transfer this
On 2-4-2011 2:51, Polytropon wrote:
So there is still stuff one needs to compile, and
YOU are in charge to define the options you need.
This is the "downside" when you're running a multi-
purpose OS like FreeBSD.
That is a good thing. But I remember an issue that I never understood. I
onced se
Op 2-4-2011 19:03, Randal L. Schwartz schreef:
That's one of the first things I do with a fresh system that will be
only a server:
echo "WITHOUT_X11=yes">> /etc/make.conf
And then *never* use packages. Only ports
Are the quotes neccessary?
___
OK, it works very well. Installing a ZFS FreeBSD system with an ufs
/boot is very very easy using the PC-BSD DVD.
However, I have one question:
I'd like to install FreeBSD (pcbsd) on a (zfs) mirror
In OpenSolaris you can install directly to the zfs mirror, but how's
this in this situation> Afte
OK, I follow the manual but still...
I have a disk fo 20Gb
I create a GPT table for the whole disk on it:
# gpart create -s gpt /dev/md0
-> md0 created
# gpart show md0
34 8573 md0 GPT (4.2M)
Only 4 Mb?? Not really what I wanted. Anyone an idea of why the whole
disk is nog used?
What am I do
Op 25-6-2011 15:14 schreef Dick Hoogendijk:
OK, I follow the manual but still...
I have a disk fo 20Gb
I create a GPT table for the whole disk on it:
# gpart create -s gpt /dev/md0
-> md0 created
# gpart show md0
34 8573 md0 GPT (4.2M)
Only 4 Mb?? Not really what I wanted. Anyone an idea
Op 23-6-2011 9:35 schreef Valentin Bud:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk <mailto:d...@nagual.nl>> wrote:
OK, it works very well. Installing a ZFS FreeBSD system with an
ufs /boot is very very easy using the PC-BSD DVD.
However, I have one question:
I&
I'm a little desperade. I installed a mirrored ZFS freebsd system in a
VM the other day and all went well. Now I did the same procedure on a
real systrem with two drives and I can't get the system to boot
properly. Everytime it halts at the mountroot prompt.
If I manually put zfs:zroot at the pr
Op 29-6-2011 21:15, Trond Endrestøl schreef:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:42+0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I'm a little desperade. I installed a mirrored ZFS freebsd system in
a VM the other day and all went well. Now I did the same procedure
on a real systrem with two drives and I can'
Op 29-6-2011 21:19, Trond Endrestøl schreef:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:18+0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 29-6-2011 21:15, Trond Endrestøl schreef:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:42+0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I'm a little desperade. I installed a mirrored ZFS freebsd system in
a VM the other da
I would welcome some advise on zfs tuning. Coming from solaris I need
this info.
The system only has 2MB of ram. No problems running solaris11 in it so
far so FreeBSD should do just fine too, but who can suggest some
settings for:
vm.kmem_size
vm.kmem_size_max
vfs.zfs.arc_max
vfs.zfs.vdev.cache
Op 29-6-2011 23:45, Gary Gatten schreef:
2 "Mega" Bytes? Surely that's a typo, but is it 200MB? 2GB?
Those that know ZFS will want to know the primary use / load of this system.
It was a typo for sure. Should be 2GB
It will be a server, so no X
FAMP
Mailserver for < 10 users (imap)
Nameserve
On solaris you can have different BE's (boot environments) using ZFS.
Is this possible with FreeBSD ZFS? I can't recall ever have seen a tool
like BEadm (solaris).
But maybe using ZFS manually I can get more BE's?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
OK, so now my ZFS on root FreeBSD-8.2 system runs smoothly and I'm very
happy being able to have ZFS (coming from solaris11), but.. what is the
best strategy to back this fbsd system up. do I create various ZFS
backup filesystem streams or can I easely backup the zroot pool as a
whole? And if y
I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to
change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn
(news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know,
there'se japanese versions, but what ever happened to the 'normal'
programs? Are they gon
Op 12-7-2011 11:39 schreef Dick Hoogendijk:
I've been a GUI man for the last couple of years. Recently I wanted to
change back to the two programs I used most: mutt (email) and slrn
(news) only to find out they were not in ports anymore. Yes I know,
there'se japanese versions, but
Op 17-7-2011 14:17 schreef Subbsd:
community decreases. It is a pity that many developers of FreeBSD have
left in Apple, the small part works over {NET,OPEN,DRAGONFLY}.BSD but
as a whole it already absolutely small small groups of people.
And do you feel this will be the end of FreeBSD?
It may be a stupid question but my FreeBSD-8.2 system lacks a /compat
directory. Is this normal? does it get installed through some kind of
software package?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Op 19-7-2011 12:21 schreef Polytropon:
So it should be there when you've been using sysinstall
for system installation. If you've used a different tool
(or "no tool"), it may be the reason why it is missing.
I installed a ZFS on root system using the known scripts. So the symlink
is not created
I want a plain console version of emacs installed on my freebsd-8.2
system. So I chose the editors/emacs-nox11 port, but I get an option
screen with a lot of options set to 'on' for which I get the feeling
they are X related. I.e. Freetype, Jpeg, Gif, GConf en lots of others.
So, I'm confused a
Op 24-7-2011 2:00 schreef Jerry:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:58:07 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
You are clearly an asshole who has no interest in having a reasonable
discussion. "Newer methods" do not "frighten" me, you stupid asshole.
Thanks Chad. At one time I thought you were intelligent with
Op 24-7-2011 12:46 schreef C. P. Ghost:
Since there are no X11 libs in emacs despite all those options
being set anyway, I suppose that setting WITHOUT_X11 creates
a non-X11 emacs.
I'm using the following port (normal emacs, with WITHOUT_X11 set):
% echo /var/db/pkg/emacs*
/var/db/pkg/emacs-23.
Op 25-7-2011 18:59 schreef Chad Perrin:
So the problem is not a missing app, it is more of the usual "vendor
lock" stuff.
There's that -- but there's also a lot of missing applications.
HTC is removing the root lock protection soon.
___
freebsd-quest
Can one of you tell me why it is not possible to browse .zfs directories
(from snapshots) with midnight commander? I'm running FreeBSD-8.2 w/ mc
from ports.
Manually switching to .zfs and it's subdirectories does show the
snapshotted files, but I would like to be able to browse them (its so
muc
Op 29-7-2011 22:14, Daniel Staal schreef:
On Fri, July 29, 2011 2:26 pm, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Can one of you tell me why it is not possible to browse .zfs directories
(from snapshots) with midnight commander? I'm running FreeBSD-8.2 w/ mc
from ports.
Manually switching to .zfs and
OK, my freebsd system runs on ZFS boot. W/ solaris getting larger disks
for a pool was quit easy. Simply replace one disk from a mirror for a
larger one, wait for the resilvering and after this replace the second
one for a larger disk and wait for the resilvering again. That's it.
Been there, d
Op 1-8-2011 16:37, Dan Nelson schreef:
In the last episode (Aug 01), Dick Hoogendijk said:
OK, my freebsd system runs on ZFS boot. W/ solaris getting larger disks
for a pool was quit easy. Simply replace one disk from a mirror for a
larger one, wait for the resilvering and after this replace
Op 1-8-2011 17:06, andrew clarke schreef:
On Mon 2011-08-01 16:30:50 UTC+0200, Dick Hoogendijk (d...@nagual.nl) wrote:
OK, my freebsd system runs on ZFS boot. W/ solaris getting larger disks
for a pool was quit easy. Simply replace one disk from a mirror for a
larger one, wait for the
PhpMyAdmin shows:
Server: Localhost via UNIX socket
Server version: 5.5.15
Protocol version: 10
User: root@localhost
MySQL charset: UTF-8 Unicode (utf8)
Apache/2.2.19 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.19 OpenSSL/0.9.8q DAV/2 PHP/5.3.6
with Suhosin-Patch
MySQL client version: mysqlnd 5.
I need pdo_mysql.so for Drupal7 to work correctly, but I only see pdo.so
and pdo_sqlite.so in the php5 extension directory. So, I checked the
'make config' to see if I forgot something. But the option to build
pdo_mysql is not there. How do I get this pdo_mysql.so file?
I would like to get some suggestions on the configuration of zfs
snapshots taken for the root pool.
zfs-snapshot-mgmt.conf.example just gives some info on /usr/home and/or /usr
Does anybody use this utility for automated snapshots for his/her
rootpool and want to share some code?
I use it in a
I installed the drupal7 port but noticed that the webserver root (the
drupal core files) were *all* owned by www:www Isn't this an enormous
security risk to have apache being able to write in the core directorues
of drupal7?
___
freebsd-questions@free
eeBSD as a guest under most virtualization software works well
This is very true, I agree. I've set up a ZFS root system with four
disks lately to try out before doing so on rela hardware and it worked
very very well.
Dick
___
freebsd-questi
A few days back I did a "portmaster -a -B -d" but later on I found out
that one port (www/eAccelerator) complained about being compiled for
another version of PHP (which by then was updated by portmaster). I
expected portmaster to take care of these kind of dependencies. Where am
I wrong in thi
Op 28-8-2011 16:27, Matthew Seaman schreef:
Ideally ports committers should bump the
eaccelerator PORTREVISION to make ports management tools do that
automatically, but if not, you're going to have to remember to do it by
hand.
Thank you for your explanation. I enjoyed reading it and learned a
If you really want. GUI based server, go for a Windows one. It will cost you
but security has improved. I would never do it though but I manage my server
with shell tools. I love the easiness of textbased config files ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
Setting up plans for the upcoming 9.0 release I have one question.
Assuming the freebsd-update utility will bring me from the 8.2-release
to the new 9.0-release I'm not sure what to do exactly with the
installed ports.
I always use portmaster. What steps do I take to get from installed
ports
Why do I get a warning if I use freebsd-update about a renewal of my
FreeBSD installation within the next two months because after that time
it will nog be supported anymore?
I run FreeBSD-release-p4. Freebsd-update 'sees' p3. Is this the cause?
___
fr
Op 4-12-2011 13:03, andrew clarke schreef:
From what I understand, the focus is on releasing FreeBSD 9.0, and 8.3
will be released after that. But 9.0 is still in testing. Despite the
message, I suspect security updates for 8.2 will still be issued for
several months after 8.3 is released, to g
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinf
Op 9-1-2012 23:00, alexus schreef:
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that lin
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef:
Dick Hoogendijk writes:
Hi,
As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo.
*You* think it's stupid.
Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's
b
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options
Op 10-1-2012 15:32, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be
*another* package that actually includes the module, like for example
a package called "mod_php5", it would install the stuff from php5 +
the apache module.
That is the way CentOS handl
I possible I want my server to upgrade from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE.
I guess the binary upgrade will not be a problem with "freebsd-update -r
9.0-RELEASE fetch" If so, I do like to hear the caveats.
My main problem lies with the installed ports. I know the -all- have to
be recompiled, but I d
Op 13-1-2012 14:56, Bas Smeelen schreef:
On 01/13/2012 02:42 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I possible I want my server to upgrade from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE.
I guess the binary upgrade will not be a problem with "freebsd-update -r
9.0-RELEASE fetch" If so, I do like to hear the c
Op 13-1-2012 15:00, Polytropon schreef:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:42:03 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I possible I want my server to upgrade from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE.
I guess the binary upgrade will not be a problem with "freebsd-update -r
9.0-RELEASE fetch" If so, I do like t
Op 14-1-2012 12:37, Mike Clarke schreef:
On Saturday 14 January 2012, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
My system is running ZFS on root now, so I would very much like to
hear if the binary upgrade through freebsd-update works well for such
a system (w/ zfs on root). I don't want to get stuck w
Op 14-1-2012 17:04, Mike Clarke schreef:
On Saturday 14 January 2012, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I had not heard of this project before. Sounds very nice if it works.
Manging BE's is one of the main things I miss in the FreeBSD ZFS
support. Coming from (open)Solaris this was quite a disappoin
Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a
zfs on root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root
system? Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd-update,
recompile all ports, finish freebsd-update). Succes stories please.. ;-)
__
Op 16-1-2012 13:17, Magnus Strahlert schreef:
On 15 January 2012 14:23, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a zfs on
root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root system?
Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd
Is it true that freebsd-update does not update the souce files from
8.2-R to 9.0-RELEASE? And if not what is the best way to get the src.txz
installed on an updated system? I do have the disc1 iso. Is src.txz
installed under /usr/src or /usr/src/sys?
tatement that the port is "broken"
You have too much to manually correct.
At the time I was not aware of the facts and lost quite some time
finding out. If you know, it's not that kind of a deal.
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ T
eBSD (imho). Those 3th party
people are responsable for the leading role of microsoft.
Not MS itself.
I'm convinced (though not proven yet) that the software you mentioned
above will run on FreeBSD (if ported natively to the OS) at least as
good, but I guess even better, then it does on window
crime against freedom.
imho: sites designed for 'iexplorer only' should be banned ;-)
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On 25 Dec legalois wrote:
> ("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the ports
> tree that I am aware of.)
It's sometimes done this way on linux systems ;-)
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:19:10 +0100
jakels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > On 25 Dec legalois wrote:
> >
> >>("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the
> >>ports tree that I am aware of.)
>
)
It's the decease of this era that lost of people find it diffcult to
honor rules except their own.
I know the saying "money makes the world turn around"
I disagree.
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve
_
n the menu rather than MS-DOS as it
> identifies the FAT type file systems.
That weirdness is over in 6.x
NTFS partitions are under "Fx DOS" now and I must say I like this much
better then "???"
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Ru
On 27 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
> --- dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
> >
> > > It doesn't really matter what the "accepted" standard is; its the
> > > one that *most* people are using.
> &g
"compat5x.sh running?"
Strange, it _is_ running, so why is it not "seen"
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
essly!
So, the question remains: WHY is this webcam dir not copied to the
right location after the compilation? Did I miss something? Anybody a
clue?
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve
_
installed and deleted in the 'cleaning' action ;-)
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
needs to be supported by FreeBSD-6
Any suggestions from happy users?
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
ugh. I dropped wordpress for it ;-)
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, se
On 12/01/06, Vasile Cristescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does pf has something like " ipfw -d show " ?
I don't know. What does 'ipfw -d show' do?
--
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
http://number9.hellooperator.net/
___
freebsd-question
There should be semicolons after each line.
On 13/01/06, Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I failed to find detailed syntax layout in dhclient.conf(5) man page,
> via web search, or be able to deduce from files in
> /misc/src/sbin/dhclient. I was looking for something like as given in
> (i)pf.con
advice.
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Also, try toggling 'pnp os installed' in the bios.
On 16 Jan 2006 09:22:55 -0500, Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ravi Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 203
> Then try disabling ACPI; I wouldn't be surprised if your system had
> no support for
1 - 100 of 822 matches
Mail list logo
