On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote: > On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wrote: > > > Dev Tugnait wrote: > > > > The port is not broken cvsup your tree > > > > > > Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the > > > proper symbolic link for the acrobat plugin, nor is the path > > > for it correct in the sample libmap.confs. Beecher's fix will correct. > > > > The only thing it doesnt do is create symbolic links which does not mark > > a port as BROKEN for one, secondly why would you remove your > > browser_plugins dir? > > That was a typo, read the followup I sent immediately following the > first message. Secondly putting plugins in browser_linux_plugins does > break firefox and mozilla. I would call that broken where I come from. > Users should not have to move things that were installed in the wrong > place. That's the job of the port.
You were very quick with your correction of the typo. Faster than some of us read their mails ;-) Secondly, I totally agree to the statement that the port is "broken" You have too much to manually correct. At the time I was not aware of the facts and lost quite some time finding out. If you know, it's not that kind of a deal. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
