in message ,
wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
>
> Hi :)
>
> I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
> First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
>
> I'm running
> # freebsd-update IDS >> outfile_28Jan2013.ids
> perhaps this will give some useful output, regarding to a wrong owne
Good day
I have an old machine that has lost its raid (0/ stripe).
Im trying to fix this.
If I go
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# gstripe list
Geom name: st0
State: UP
Status: Total=3, Online=3
Type: AUTOMATIC
Stripesize: 65536
ID: 1006591079
Providers:
1. Name: stripe/st0
Mediasize: 36010229
There are few things you should do.
First,
w/r to you complaint about first-kill-then restart, this will do it for you
/etc/rc.d/dhclient lagg0 restart
second,
I remember you wrote that you have a trouble with disconnects even in
wireless-only setup (no failover setup). If so, you should run and
A follow-up:
> third,
> I would test with IPv6 disabled (entirely for the system), regardless of
> connectivity type;
> that also means to explicitly disable that failover setup line in your config
> ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="**YES"
> jb
W/r to IPv6 (disable, enable, etc):
read man pages for
29.01.2013 11:54, Michael Powell:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I guess what I'm trying to point out is that low performance wrt software
RAID will stem from other things besides just simply consuming a few CPU
cycles. Today's CPUs have the cycles to spare. I've been using gmirror for
RAID 1 mirrors fo
El día Monday, January 28, 2013 a las 10:28:06PM -1000, parv escribió:
> in message ,
> wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
> >
> > Hi :)
> >
> > I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
> > First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
> >
> > I'm running
> > # freebsd-update IDS >>
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 22:28 -1000, parv wrote:
> in message ,
> wrote Ralf Mardorf thusly...
> >
> > Hi :)
> >
> > I hope it's ok, when I open a new thread for this issue.
> > First I need to know what files have a bad owner.
> >
> > I'm running
> > # freebsd-update IDS >> outfile_28Jan2013.ids
> >
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
when somebody makes a big mistake? Perhaps more people stay with Linux
than other *NIX, regardin
El día Tuesday, January 29, 2013 a las 12:23:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf escribió:
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
>
> Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
> when
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:08:20 +0100
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, January 28, 2013 a las 10:28:06PM -1000, parv escribió:
>
>
> In general, I find all this thread (wrong file owner) a bit boring.
I find it very interesting.
> This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a n
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:55 +0100, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
It cannot get worse. His experience will show also others how robust
FreeBSD is in case of failures.
Indeed. Linux users ask me why I play with FreeBSD. I already could make a
list with drawbacks and advantages of both OS. Some of m
29.01.2013 04:37, Thomas Mueller:
28.01.2013 01:57, james:
I have a 9.1 system with some SATA disks in RAIDZ, upgraded from 9.0.
The disks are all the same type, and I formatted them for FreeBSD and
put ZFS in a slice covering most of them.
I have seen suggestions for OpenIndiana etc that it i
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:57:30 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:55 +0100, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > It cannot get worse. His experience will show also others how robust
> > FreeBSD is in case of failures.
>
> Indeed. Linux users ask me why I play with FreeBSD. I a
Artem Kuchin wrote:
[snip]
> The server is going to be a web server with many sites and with mysql
> running on it. Nothing really really
> heavy. Currently with run all this on our own server with 8 cores and
> 16GB ram and 3ware raid1
> and cpu load is about 5% :) Everything is quick and respons
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:55 +0100, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
>> It cannot get worse. His experience will show also others how robust
>> FreeBSD is in case of failures.
>
> Indeed. Linux users ask me why I play with FreeBSD. I already could make a
> list with drawbacks and a
I suspect it's less effort to use Thunar and instead of scrolling, as I
did before (when I missed some wrong owners), to switch sorting by owner
between ascending and descending, to ensure not to miss a bad owner again.
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
/bin
# find /usr/TMP4
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:18 +0100, wrote:
mtree
I was confused, since the existing files only provide directories. Ok, I
guess I understand, I can let mtree generate new files using the backup. I
anyway need to take care about files that are missing by the backup.
Thank you.
--
Sent fr
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
# ls -ld /bin/sh
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 142952 Dec 23 18:38 /bin/sh
# ls -ld /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh
ls: /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh: No such file or directory
This is an error in reasoning :D. I compared the original /bin, with a
restore from
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
My other concern is what happens when one drive goes down if we use gmirror?
Is it completelly transparent
and bad drive can be hot swapped while server is running and rebuild started?
I am thinking now about gpt+gmirror (including boot and swap)
As fa
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
> bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
> It starts the boot process fine and gets to the Bootstrap loader
> message with revision 1.1. The
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Presumably the disks are currently FreeBSD-specific. If I used raw
>> disks instead of slices, could I read them from a Solaris system too?
>
> ^ I'm mostly sure you would be able to read disks from Solaris/x86.
> ^ However Solaris/Sparc uses
On Jan 29, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>>
>> Is GPT compatible with Solaris, can Solaris access a GPT disk?
>
> Yes. I'm not sure if it can boot off GPT disk but on Solaris zpool
> automatically creates boundary GPT partition to protect ZFS vdev.
Under the Solaris-based
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and
GEOM metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to
mirror GPT partitions, but be aware that if you mirror more than one
partition
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:57:31 -0600, Warren Block
wrote:
As far a gmirror is concerned, yes, drives can be removed and new drives
inserted while the mirror is running. Hot swap is more of an issue with
the hardware. I have not tried it with SATA drives, although I think it
should work.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:54:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:41:34 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > On 1/28/2013 7:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> Still not perfect, I guess I need something similar to ls -RAl for some
> >> directories :S and I didn't test what awk will do with na
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:23:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
>
> Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, [...]
Excuse me, it's not a _simple_ mistake
I don't use space in filenames, I just wanted to ensure, that file names
with spaces will be handled partly correctly.
At the moment I'm not working intensively. Every once in a while I take a
look at a directory and compare it with the backups. If there's something
wrong, I manually run chow
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and GEOM
metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to mirror GPT
partitions, but be aware t
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:52:47 -0800, Patrick wrote:
> Is there any way in FreeBSD to view all running processes hierarchically,
> like Activity Monitor in Mac OS X can do?
>
> e.g.
> http://f.cl.ly/items/37310J17273X3F1E1l0G/Image%202013.01.29%2013:50:36%20.png
>
> I believe I have a masked proces
pstree? (in sysutils from ports)
--
Devin
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:53 PM
> To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List
> Subject: Viewing processes hiera
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
Thanks,
--
Alejandro Imass
_
On 1/29/2013 3:52 PM, Patrick wrote:
Is there any way in FreeBSD to view all running processes hierarchically,
like Activity Monitor in Mac OS X can do?
e.g.
http://f.cl.ly/items/37310J17273X3F1E1l0G/Image%202013.01.29%2013:50:36%20.png
I believe I have a masked process spawned from an Apache p
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:31 PM, wrote:
> pstree? (in sysutils from ports)
> --
> Devin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> > questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:53 PM
> > To: FreeBSD
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
That's a good poin
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's intentional but in section
>>
>> 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
>>
>> The step that says:
>>
>> portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
>>
>> Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb witho
Fbsd8 wrote:
I have noticed that the /etc/rc.d/jail script
will not start a jail that has the same ip address
as a jail that is already running.
But if I define 2 jails the manual way in rc.conf that
have the same ip address they will start.
So is this a bug in the "jail" script or is there som
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
>> bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
>> It starts the boot process fine and get
You sent an email to the Exchange list
with an attachment. We have disabled this
option as recently a virus was attached.
Please resend your posting without it?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
It starts
Admittedly disk space is cheap, but old habits die hard and I just don't
like keeping stuff I no longer need.
I converted to pkgng just under a couple of months ago, and have had no
serious problems (even the minor issues have been promptly resolved with
the kind and able assistance of Matthew
On 30/01/2013 04:47, Walter Hurry wrote:
> Admittedly disk space is cheap, but old habits die hard and I just don't
> like keeping stuff I no longer need.
>
> I converted to pkgng just under a couple of months ago, and have had no
> serious problems (even the minor issues have been promptly reso
41 matches
Mail list logo
