On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
That's a good point. It should probably be the origin,
databases/ruby-bdb. I don't have a way to test that right now.
But really, it ought to be rewritten to use ports-mgmt/portmaster to
remove the dependency issue entirely. In fact, that could just refer to
the upgrade process at the end of the portmaster(8) man page.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
