On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:01:20 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:31:41 +0200
> Polytropon articulated:
>
> > Your TV example is very good. I've recently read a text
> > that predicts the future of CDs - a text from the late 80's.
> > When we consider what we are _currently_ using, the tex
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:05:27 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Go to hell. He wants to rename the files that are illegal
> to ones that aren't.
It's not the file names that matter, it's the content.
Just assume that students at a university use a file server
to store pr0n although the terms of use pro
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:39:02 +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> On 19/07/2011 01:21, Gary Gatten wrote:
> >
> >
> > This may get me flamed (probably will) but I'm wondering what
> > the relationship is between FreeBSD and PC-BSD? PERHAPS if
> > they were to somehow join forces, share development load,
Wow wow !!! I did not want to start a flame war with my post ...
Things for me are clear :
In France it's illegal and I have my boss's instruction :
- find and delete the files that's all.
On 07/19/2011 07:49 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From edi...@d3photography.com Tue Jul 19 00:05:30 2011
I found it very interesting to look at the thread "Lennart Poettering: BSD
Isn't Relevant Anymore" and the original interview.
Just to make clear: I started using FreeBSD approximately in 1994 with
2.0-RELEASE and still use FreeBSD and hope to do so a lot of years to
come.
But: Neither BSD
On 19 Jul 2011, at 08:15, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Wow wow !!! I did not want to start a flame war with my post ...
>
> Things for me are clear :
>
> In France it's illegal and I have my boss's instruction :
>
> - find and delete the files that's all.
>
Bon courage then...
A file can not be
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
