Hello again,
Did some more research. I have a system running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p12 with
an earlier version on mysql (mysql-server-5.0.41). Same thing, the
mysqld_multi and mysqlmanager
is missing. Once again do i miss something? If yes what is it?
And of course if there are other possibiliti
Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0
The OS was downloaded from freebsd.org two months ago.
When I am trying to upgrade ports by using portsnap, portsnap doesn't work.
# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching public key from portsnap1.freebsd.org... key h
These applications have predefined ports they use to start up the
bi-directional packet conversation. But them unsolicited packeted come
in from other pc nodes to share data using a wide range of high port
numbers. IPFW, IPF, and PF don't seem to have a rule option to allow
packs in/out based o
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Ott Köstner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentin Bud wrote:
>
>> And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld
>> instances on one server
>> please let me know.
>>
>>
>
> There is no limit, how many instances of mysqld you can run. Just
> specify
Quoting Andrew Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are
great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software?
I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not "getting" KDE4.
Hi Andrew,
if you're into LaTeX, then
my /var/db/portsnap/pub.ssh file (i use 7.1-PRERELEASE):
-BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-
MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA0FgDRCCYpEOiTHwtjtDI
rz/OLIOhjNZKa9OEtcbyHS24GMpMYp+lAb1uCxCyyJUQ7F08phNNud39cdpBBtjg
ZFSisdJARYu2IhgEvxJqN+1EKVw6psLCOwlosIJlALPohf0LzTQ2eMkrDNk1xXru
37nIF5Qn6qcX9GjAJYc
Valentin Bud wrote:
And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld
instances on one server
please let me know.
There is no limit, how many instances of mysqld you can run. Just
specify different database directories and sockets for each instance.
Something like that:
$ mys
Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
These applications have predefined ports they use to start up the
bi-directional packet conversation. But them unsolicited packeted
come in from other pc nodes to share data using a wide range of high
port numbers. IPFW, IPF, and PF don't seem to have a r
On 11/26/08, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are
>> great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software?
>> I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:57:20 +0300
__ __ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0
> The OS was downloaded from freebsd.org two months ago.
>
> When I am trying to upgrade ports by using portsnap, portsnap doesn't
> work.
>
> # portsnap fetch
> Lookin
Quoting "Paul B. Mahol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
xpdf also support full-screen option and is much lighter than Adobe Reader,
and doesnt depends on linux stuff.
evince can be of use if you already have it installed, because it
supports fullscreen and presentation mode.
Yes, this is correct. I was
I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are
great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software?
I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not "getting" KDE4.
Thanks,
Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@fre
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800
Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching
> the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are
> blocked by design.
>
> How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
You received this message by consenting to receive e-mail from
Consumer-PromotionCenter on 11/24/2008 12:00:00 AM. To be sure you
don't miss any special offers, please add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to your address book.
Consumer-PromotionCent
You might want to have a look at
http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/
Works in a browser ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
> others without causing strange secondary problems.
>
> Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm
> forgetting something important.
>
Hi all;
Ok uber noob question here.
I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to
gettext-0.17_1
Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command?
I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which
means I either suck at goog
Wow can you believe that we consented to receiving this.
Amazing. This has to be legit right...
...
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ConsumerPromotionCenter
Sent: November-26-08 10:04 AM
To:
Subject: Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Andrew Gould wrote:
| I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are
| great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software?
| I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not "getting" KDE4.
I would s
FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE, with KDE as desktop environment and KDM as
display manager.
I have 2 users, say user1 and user2.
Boot, KDM login as user1, OK.
Then I do a close session.
OK, KDM presents me again with the KDM login screen, login as user2, OK.
Then again, close session.
Now, the KDM login scr
from /usr/ports/UPDATE, you need to rebuild all ports...
AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU)
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.17, the shared library version
of libintl has changed, so you will need to rebuild all ports that
depend on gettext:
So am I to understand the package tree is considered part of the ports, i've
fetching the packages from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6-stable/All/
I don't have a local ports tree, since i'm tight on space ( only 20gig HDD
).
Can ports be fetched remotely?
Thanks
> From: Gary Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi all;
>
> Ok uber noob question here.
>
> I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to
> gettext-0.17_1
>
> Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command?
>
> I google'ed it and only found ways to u
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:36:40 +0100, Gary Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all;
Ok uber noob question here.
I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update
to
gettext-0.17_1
Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command?
I google'ed it and onl
"Gary Hartl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So am I to understand the package tree is considered part of the ports, i've
> fetching the packages from
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6-stable/All/
>
> I don't have a local ports tree, since i'm tight on space ( only 20gig
Gary Hartl wrote:
Hi all;
Ok uber noob question here.
I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to
gettext-0.17_1
Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command?
I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which
means
Hello all.
Quick question - is where is a way to monitoring Dell PERC 6 RAID
Controller in FreeBSD 7.x ?
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
Andrew Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
others without causing strange secondary problems.
Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I
hello,
wonder people could shed some light how to debug more when configuring
ipsec tunnel with racoon that it seems to fail on the phase1
negotiation with racoon log info listed in the following. i tried aes
as encryption algorithm, but it failed the same way.
not sure the invalid length of pay
sorry for asking but what are this "limewire" programs are?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good
project to get some familiarity with the por
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry for asking but what are this "limewire" programs are?
>
>
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Andrew Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
>>> others without causing strange secondary problems.
>>>
>>> Actually a de
* Lowell Gilbert [2008-11-26 11:17:25 -0500]:
Sure. pkg_add(1) has a '-r' option for fetching remotely, and
portupgrade(1) has a '-P' option to specify using packages (it will
fetch from FreeBSD servers if possible).
To expand on Lowell's answer, using portupgrade's -P option can avoid a
leng
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>
>>> Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
>>> will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
>>> use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar
"fire jotawski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i did cvsup with supfile given in example,
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile,
> and set base to /var/db and prefix to /home/ncvs as suggested and then
>
> cvsup -g -L 2 -h HOST /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
>
> where HOST is the one that
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:31:10 +0100
Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From that error message I'd say you probably need to populate
> /usr/local/i386-linux/include with glibc and linux kernel headers.
How can I populate it with them? Manually installing them in this
directory? May be th
Any C++ hackers out there would can clue me in on getting a 10-year-old
c++ program to build? I finished it--or about 95%, then gave up when I
decided the whole project was impractical. Need help on the
stuff.
thanks in advance,
gary
--
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:40:03AM -0500, Gary Hartl wrote:
> Wow can you believe that we consented to receiving this.
>
> Amazing. This has to be legit right...
>
> ...
>
> Gary
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> ConsumerProm
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600
"Andrew Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > sorry for asking but what are this "limewire" programs are?
> >
> >
> My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sh
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600
"Andrew Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > sorry for asking but what are this "limewire" programs are?
> >
> >
> My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sh
dick hoogendijk wrote:
I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad!
...and, BTW, Limewire port is readily available for FreeBSD:
http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-p2p/limewire
"LimeWire is a fast, easy-to-use file sharing program that contains no
spyware, adware or other bund
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 05:50:21 Unga wrote:
> I need to study the implementation of getpriority(2) and rtprio(2) system
> calls. Appreciate if somebody could point me to where these system calls
> are implemented in FreeBSD source tree, that is, in which file/s.
For future ref:
find /usr/
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc.
that's my cli
When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: "Never use
Limewire, or anything like it."
just downloading/sharing files allows you to download viruses, but it's
up to you to run them.
well unless P2P program is really broken, or you are sharing executables.
for sharing movies
can someone explain to me, please, why i get a kernel panic on boot w/ the
latest 7.1 when i have something plugged into a usb port?
thx.
david coder
network engineer emeritus
verio/ntt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Rick Janssen wrote:
> I've been playing around with FreeBSD for some time now, still being
> unable to solve some problems. Let me explain.
>
> I'm trying to run a webserver on the machine. Just basic, nothing too
> fancy. Problem concerns the following: The website served is speedy as
> expected w
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spywa
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:28:49 -0600
"Andrew Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When the last culprit get's his computer back, he
> will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire.
DOS 6.0 ? :P it's java...
> The next time, he'll get it back without a network card.
ou
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:52:16 +
RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
>
> > It is one of the
> > fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc.
> >
> > The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to
> > block. In essence, the program gets the user to by
Fbsd1 wrote:
[snip]
>
> Limewire is a windows only application.
> So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix?
>
Limewire is a Java program. It will run on any platform which has a
working Java run time environment installed. It is definitely not
"Windows only".
-Jason
_
Hi friends.
I have some years of experience in unix and linux red hat, but I never ca'nt
update from one version to other version, and now I wanna update my unix 6.1 to
6.3 or 7.0 without start over again.
somebody here could help me with thath, please.
thanks
sincerely
TOMAS
___
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800
Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching
> the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are
> blocked by design.
>
> How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir/Madam:
Pleasant day!
First of all, sorry if this enquiry shouldn’t be directed to you, please help
me direct to the right person.
Few months ago I’ve purchase a FreeBSD book which includes an installation DVD
for FreeBSD 6.1. I tried to install it in m
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Tomás Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi friends.
>
> I have some years of experience in unix and linux red hat, but I never ca'nt
> update from one version to other version, and now I wanna update my unix 6.1
> to 6.3 or 7.0 without start over again.
> som
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Tom Marchand wrote:
> >>> Ian,
> >>>
> >>> You could always test it using VMWare Fusionand then let
> >>> us know
> >>
> >> Er, Gee thanks. I'll just have a word with the VMware guys about
> >> fully
> >> abastracting the mini in software... back in a jiffy ;-
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
>
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
>>> application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
>>> usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet
will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system
that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Andrew Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>>
>>
> My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and L
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:40:21 michael wrote:
> will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system
> that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines.
Yes, but read all the docs completely there are a number of options you need,
like telling it to us
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/
The printer is Epson Stylus Photo R265. I'm using gutenprint 5 and CUPS.
The test page prints well from CUPS. I can also print images and web
pages from firefox, because the "CUPS/R265" printer can be selected in
the print dialog of firefox.
However, when I open an image from eog (eye of gnome
Hello Beech,
Could you be more specific on what documentation to read.
thank you and a great day,
v
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:40:21 michael wrote:
>> will make release work for current? i've built a nice working s
Hello,
GD-2.0.35 fails to install on my production server saying that
GD_FONTS not found.
How can I solve this problem?
Regards,
Victor.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
64 matches
Mail list logo
