On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800 Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching > the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are > blocked by design. > > How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
Hi, i think there are a few interesting posts in this thread (and several corrections about p2p 'evilness', which is good :P ). A thread that may be of interest was started on net@ earlier in the year - look for : From: Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Application layer classifier for ipfw Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:02:29 +0300 - it refers to ipfw, not pf. - I think there was at least another thread following up on this with working code,etc. of course, DPI-style checks won't work (at all, or in a scalable fashion) as soon as users start encrypting their packets :P b _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." Mark Twain I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"