On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it >>> will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to >>> use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good >>> project to get some familiarity with the ports tree. >> >> Would it be worthwhile to add a test and warning that all installed >> binaries >> have not been stripped to the 'security-check' target in bsd.port.mk? >> That's >> not really what that target was intended for (feeping creaturism alert!) >> but >> it's the obvious place to put such a test. >> >> Probably cleaner to create a whole new target, but that's going to >> duplicate >> some code. >> >> Hmmmm... I shall work up some patches, probably over the weekend, so >> there's >> something substantive to talk about. > > Done: ports/129210 > > For the record, I also discovered that, contrary to what I said earlier, > there is apparently one class of binary object that will not work correctly > if stripped: kernel loadable modules.
Kernel loadable modules are already stripped (--strip-debug). -- Paul _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
