Hi,
How can I know if my Fbsd box supports NCQ and if it's beeing
used?
- Marcelo
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
|prad wrote:
|> i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
|> i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
|> outperform scsi.
|>
|> for the
I have a SCSI controller, two cd-rom drives and the external tape
streamer on my workstation. No SCSI harddisk anymore. A 18 or 36GB
harddisk is likely to be the SCSI-2 standard, this is the controller I have.
In the past it was quite a speedy interface, but I guess even the older ATAs
outperform
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> The concept that SATA subsystems will tend to consume more CPU cycles
>> because SCSI controllers
>
> untrue. SATA disk consumes really small amount of CPU under FreeBSD. even
> if it's less than on SCSI controller it is still very little.
>
Uh, maybe read the _ent
The concept that SATA subsystems will tend to consume more CPU cycles because
SCSI controllers
untrue. SATA disk consumes really small amount of CPU under FreeBSD. even
if it's less than on SCSI controller it is still very little.
___
freebsd-quest
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>> prad wrote:
>> i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
>> i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
>> outperform scsi.
>>
[snip]
> Prad,
>
> Have a look at this URL: http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
>
While I found this interest
At 03:59 PM 6/26/2008, prad wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:53:00 +0200
Jos Chrispijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at this URL:
> http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
>
this was very interesting and thorough.
and thanks to everyone else who responded especially david and bill
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > we have a chance to buy 18G scsi at $5 or 36G for $25.
>
> with THAT price - SCSI make sense :)
>
> >
> > what the seller isn't sure about is whether they will be compatible
> > with the particular server.
>
> SCSI is SCSI.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:59:15 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SCSI is SCSI. unless the device doesn't comply to standards
> (unlikely) it just works!
>
thanks wojciech!
i also came across the following in this article from 1999:
"Seagate is committed to Ultra3 SCSI and pl
we have a chance to buy 18G scsi at $5 or 36G for $25.
with THAT price - SCSI make sense :)
what the seller isn't sure about is whether they will be compatible
with the particular server.
SCSI is SCSI. unless the device doesn't comply to standards (unlikely) it
just works!
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:53:00 +0200
Jos Chrispijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at this URL:
> http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19
>
this was very interesting and thorough.
and thanks to everyone else who responded especially david and bill.
unfortunately, david, most of the l
prad wrote:
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
Prad,
Have a look at this URL: http://
In response to prad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
> i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
> outperform scsi.
>
> for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
> preferable over the other? and what about sata?
Th
At 11:25 AM 6/26/2008, prad wrote:
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
--
In friendship,
p
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
SATA are too.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
the performance are similar by interfaces, SCSI drives tend to have higher
RPM and faster heads and can be 30-50% faster for 5 times higher price.
does
> i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
> i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
> outperform scsi.
I seriously doubt that. Maybe if you take a single old first
generation SCSI disk and compare it to a modern IDE drive. But that's
not exactly comparing apples to apple
i've heard scsi hard drives are really good.
i've also seen at least one site which claims that ide easily
outperform scsi.
for the server we got (dual P3 1GHz 2M which will use raid), is one
preferable over the other? and what about sata?
--
In friendship,
prad
16 matches
Mail list logo
