The update is a delta from what is already on your system. When you
updated the older box, you pulled in lots of changes to get it
current. The newer box needed fewer updates to get current.
Or something is wrong. You can always delete the contents of /ports
and the database in /var/db/portsnap
Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run
the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32-bit
machine typically gets several to dozens or hundreds of updates, while the
64-bit machine typically gets none, or maybe a couple. What might b
to a VM.
>>
>> One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as
>> the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a
>> KDB stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to verify the
>> integ
Hi, Reference:
> From: Walter Hurry
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:43:47 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
> I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM.
>
> One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As so
El 01/06/2013 15:44, "Walter Hurry" escribió:
>
> I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM.
>
> One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as
> the extract starts it produces a 'lock order revers
I'm installing FreeBSD10 (head; snapshot from 30 May 2013) into a VM.
One of the first things I do is a 'portsnap fetch extract'. As soon as
the extract starts it produces a 'lock order reversal' message with a KDB
stack backtrace, but then proceeds successfully to
fddi wrote:
[snip]
>
> so ther is something wrong in my crontab
>
> 0 3 * * * /usr/sbin/portsnap -I cron update && pkg_version -vIL=
See man portsnap, section TIPS - it shows example of correct way:
0 3 * * * root /usr/sbin/portsnap cron
The TIPS section contains more det
hello, here is from portsnap.conf
# PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
so it is /usr/ports
instead in my environment $PORTSDIR is undefined.
Here is
/usr/ports/lang/python27/Makefile
PORTNAME= python27
PORTVERSION=2.7.3
PORTREVISION= 6
after I did
portsnap fetch update
everythign looks
On 19/05/2013 15:49, fddi wrote:
Hello,
I am using portsnap to update my port collection on FreeBSD 9.1
the first time I ran it a few weeks ago I did|
||
|||portsnap fetch|
||
|and then
portsnap exctract
then I did a crontab script to update ports every night
0 3 * * * /usr/sbin/portsnap -I
Hello,
I am using portsnap to update my port collection on FreeBSD 9.1
the first time I ran it a few weeks ago I did|
||
|||portsnap fetch|
||
|and then
portsnap exctract
then I did a crontab script to update ports every night
0 3 * * * /usr/sbin/portsnap -I cron update && pkg_vers
master. I don't know much about the portsnap mirror
infrastructure, but if they're updated via cron, maybe their timings are
just a little off for when syncing from the master. If the mirror tried
to sync every 8 hours, but syncs 30 minutes before the master builds a
new set, it'
On Saturday, April 06, 2013 20:37:45 Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 4/6/2013 5:01 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Are there problems with portsnap servers, please? I saw on fresports.org
> > Opera update long eight or more hours ago but my portsnap fetch update
> > show
On 4/6/2013 5:01 PM, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Are there problems with portsnap servers, please? I saw on fresports.org Opera
update long eight or more hours ago but my portsnap fetch update shows:
portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:01:05 -0400, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Are there problems with portsnap servers, please? I saw on fresports.org
Opera
update long eight or more hours ago but my portsnap fetch update shows:
portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found
Hi!
Are there problems with portsnap servers, please? I saw on fresports.org Opera
update long eight or more hours ago but my portsnap fetch update shows:
portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org
John Levine wrote:
> When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
^^
> "Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that
> originated from CVS!! "Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6: warni
When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
"Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that originated
from CVS!!
"Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6: warning: The FreeBSD project has switched from CVS to
SubVersion.
"Mk/bsd.port.m
When a port gets committed where is it really being committed to?
Why is there such a delay before svn.freebsd.org/ports/head gets updated
with the newly committed port?
How often is the portsnap file updated?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>'rm -fr /var/db/portsnap/*'
>and then 'portsnap fetch && portsnap extract'
Thanks everyone!
Dale Scott
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-question
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:13:50 +
Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/27/12 05:50, Dale Scott wrote:
> > Hi, I was running "portsnap fetch" on a remote terminal when my
> > connection failed. After connecting running portsnap again, it
> > appeared to complete correctly
On 11/27/12 05:50, Dale Scott wrote:
Hi, I was running "portsnap fetch" on a remote terminal when my connection
failed. After connecting running portsnap again, it appeared to complete
correctly. However, when I run "portsnap extract" I get the following error:
casper# po
Hi, I was running "portsnap fetch" on a remote terminal when my connection
failed. After connecting running portsnap again, it appeared to complete
correctly. However, when I run "portsnap extract" I get the following error:
casper# portsnap extract
/usr/ports/.cvsignore
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:40:59 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:44:40 + (UTC), jb wrote:
>
> > This is not the same what portsnap(8) does:
> > portsnap ... command ...
> > This "command" word is non-executable by itself; it has a meaning on
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:44:40 + (UTC), jb wrote:
> This is not the same what portsnap(8) does:
> portsnap ... command ...
> This "command" word is non-executable by itself; it has a meaning only as
> a special word passed to portsnap command to tell it what to do intern
Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
>
> > From: jb gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: portsnap
> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:43:30 + (UTC)
> >
> > So, the manual for portsnap(8) is imprecise, actually unfortunate because
> > misleading.
> From: jb
> Subject: Re: portsnap
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:43:30 + (UTC)
>
> So, the manual for portsnap(8) is imprecise, actually unfortunate because
> misleading.
The manual/ manpage for portsnap(8) and its use of 'command' is precise
*and* entirel
round, so we
can compare them.
The are two entities, each having in their description as receiving a command
as a parameter, namely:
- portsnap ... command ...
e.g. portsnap fetch
- system(command);
e.g. system("ls -al");
The former is passed an action keyword as an argument (I l
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:42:37 + (UTC), jb wrote:
> Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > > > the authors of the portsnap docs (and the _numerous_ other applications
> > > > that describe the use of certain keywords used as input
Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
> ...
> > > the authors of the portsnap docs (and the _numerous_ other applications
> > > that describe the use of certain keywords used as input to that
> > > appication ARE correct -- despite your boneheaded denial of
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Nov 20 11:14:25 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jb
> Subject: Re: portsnap
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:12:46 + (UTC)
>
> Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> >
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:46:55 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Educate yourselves, please. It's scary when one confuses command arguments
> with a command because some nitwit described/called it that way.
> jb
Well with nearly 30 years in unix software development I do know a
thing or two about i
e.g. what is "a command", also called "an entry").
> > Otherwise they screw up the users and "it's a software error" sysadmins.
>
> the authors of the portsnap docs (and the _numerous_ other applications
> that describe the use of certain keywords used
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Nov 20 03:17:25 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jb
> Subject: Re: portsnap
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:15:16 + (UTC)
>
> Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > > >
Steve O'Hara-Smith sohara.org> writes:
> ...
Educate yourselves, please. It's scary when one confuses command arguments
with a command because some nitwit described/called it that way.
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:15:16 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> > You persist in repeating your error.
> > ...
>
> Well, yes - CLI applies to many environments (not only OSs), with the same
> basic format.
Why don't the pair of you try and understand
Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
> ...
> > > > > > > You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other
> > > > > > > failed.
> > > >
> > > > Nope. I gave ONE command: 'portsnap fetch update'
> From: jb
> Subject: Re: portsnap
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:05:41 + (UTC)
>
> Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> >
> > > From owner-freebsd-questions freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23
> > > 2012 To: freebsd-questions free
Robert Bonomi mail.r-bonomi.com> writes:
>
> > From owner-freebsd-questions freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23 2012
> > To: freebsd-questions freebsd.org
> > From: jb gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: portsnap
> > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:13:45 + (
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jb
> Subject: Re: portsnap
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:13:45 + (UTC)
>
> RW googlemail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:4
RW googlemail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 + (UTC)
> jb wrote:
>
> > > You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed.
Nope. I gave ONE command: 'portsnap fetch update'.
> > But this looks like a flaky entry v
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> > You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed.
> >
> > "fetch" downloads and applies patches to the compressed
> > snapshot. "update" uses the compressed snapshot to update
RW googlemail.com> writes:
> ...
> > ...
> > So, why did it do so much work (ca. 5 min, 24085 patches), even
> > claiming to have applied patches, before telling me the env was not
> > properly set up ? jb
>
> You gave portsnap two commands - one succeed
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:21:19 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Hi,
> have i caught portsnap with its pants down ?
>
> # rm -rf /usr/ports
> # portsnap fetch update
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsna
Hi,
have i caught portsnap with its pants down ?
# rm -rf /usr/ports
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Sun Nov 11 15:54:03 CET
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 00:37:47 Elias Chrysocheris wrote:
> Yeap. Same here:
>
> pluto# portsnap fetch update
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
> Latest snapshot on serv
Yeap. Same here:
pluto# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
How can
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jason Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ajtiM wrote:
>
>> On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>> > 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > Is
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with
> my
> >
On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with my
> > system. When I run portsnap...:
> > portsnap fetch update
> > Loo
13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
> Hi!
>
> Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with my
> system. When I run portsnap...:
> portsnap fetch update
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag fro
Hi!
Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with my
system. When I run portsnap...:
portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what
Regarding my question,
How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not using portsnap?
Helmut Schneider had two suggestions:
> You install ports from CD/DVD. Or use pkg_add -r subversion. :)
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/
I guess I could use the latter an
ree or svn in that case if not using portsnap?
As this is an O(1) kind of problem, I'd suggest the easiest
way: Use the package for svn. Install svn via
# pkg_add -r svn
(or however the svn package is called) and then use it to
incorporate the full ports tree (and maybe also bring yo
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to
> > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then
> > for ports or also
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> How do you get the ports tree or svn in that case if not using portsnap?
You use pkg_add (or the youngest newcomer pkg)
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
> sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
> also fetch them via svn?
Polytropon responded:
> Port
Hi,
Yes, files are written to the /var filesystem. I have tried fetching the
file manually and I have even tried to newfs the partition again and to
copy the files back. I also tried to delete the portsnap directory
completely. None of this fixed the error. Note that I access the web
through a
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:56:29 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad
> > file descriptor" message when t
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad
> file descriptor" message when trying using it on one of my i386 machine:
>
> Looking up portsnap5.freebsd.org mirrors... non
C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider
> wrote:
> > Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep
> > using svn for both.
>
> While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so
> frequently? Remember, it's not just fetching the source
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Currently I'm updating ports and src twice a day so I will keep using
> svn for both.
While you certainly can, isn't it a bit excessive to update so frequently?
Remember, it's not just fetching the sources and ports, you must also
compile
; > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then
> > > for ports or also fetch them via svn?
> >
> > Ports and system sources are managed independently. You can
> > use whatever tool you want.
>
> The question should read: If I need to insta
Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to
> > fetch sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then
> > for ports or a
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:37:03 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
> sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
> also fetch them via svn?
Ports and system
Hi,
I'm running a custom kernel so I (guess I) need svn in future to fetch
sources instead of cvsup. Should I still use portsnap then for ports or
also fetch them via svn?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
[ Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote on Tue 4.Sep'12 at 10:14:18 -0400 ]
> Hi,
>
> so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad
> file descriptor" message when trying using it on one of my i386 machine:
>
> Looking up portsnap5.freebsd.org
Hi,
so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad
file descriptor" message when trying using it on one of my i386 machine:
Looking up portsnap5.freebsd.org mirrors... none found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching snapsho
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jul 21 09:40:20 2012
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:38:02 +0200
> From: Leslie Jensen
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Power failure during portsnap fetch update
>
>
> My file system /usr/ports/net go damaged
2012-07-21 17:33, Wojciech Puchar skrev:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
It fixed the problem :-)
you may "risk" putting
fsck_y_enable=YES
i
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
It fixed the problem :-)
you may "risk" putting
fsck_y_enable=YES
in your rc.conf
i put background_fsck=NO
2012-07-21 16:59, Wojciech Puchar skrev:
how about fsck_ffs -y / in single user mode?
seems like no clri is needed.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:56:28 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> Here are the errors:
>
>
> root@bsd01~:fsck -F /dev/ad4s3f
> ** /dev/ad4s3f (NO WRITE)
In that case, fsck won't correct any errors. Good for checking,
bad for repairing!
Make sure the partition isn't mounted (
how about fsck_ffs -y / in single user mode?
seems like no clri is needed.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebs
2012-07-21 16:44, Wojciech Puchar skrev:
I've done fsck -F in single user mode but there are warnings about not
being able to fix this.
without the messages from fsck i cannot help you.
there are rare cases when mess gets written to inodes that fsck will not
corrent it and you have to do it
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:38:02 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> My file system /usr/ports/net go damaged
>
> I've done fsck -F in single user mode but there are warnings about not
> being able to fix this.
First of all, you should give fsck a second try. Check the
damaged partition per "fsck -y /d
I've done fsck -F in single user mode but there are warnings about not being
able to fix this.
without the messages from fsck i cannot help you.
there are rare cases when mess gets written to inodes that fsck will not
corrent it and you have to do it yourself. most often - using clri(8).
__
My file system /usr/ports/net go damaged
I've done fsck -F in single user mode but there are warnings about not
being able to fix this.
The directories below cannot be removed
How do I go about this?
Thanks
/Leslie
total 14
drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 512 21 Jul 16:13 ccxstream/
drwxr-x
On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Gary Aitken
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:02:30 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: portsnap update won't update original /usr/ports
>
> Accordin
- Original Message -
From: Gary Aitken
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:02:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: portsnap update won't update original /usr/ports
According to the handbook, one can do
portsnap fetch
portsnap update
and the update will work w
On 23/05/2012 08:32, Gary Aitken wrote:
According to the handbook, one can do portsnap fetch portsnap update
and the update will work with a previously created ports tree; I
presume this includes one created during system install.
However, when I attempted this, portsnap complained: /usr/ports
According to the handbook, one can do
portsnap fetch
portsnap update
and the update will work with a previously created ports tree;
I presume this includes one created during system install.
However, when I attempted this, portsnap complained:
/usr/ports was not created by portsnap.
You
2011/12/4 Len Conrad :
> Never had a problem before
>
> Freebsd 8.2
>
> a couple weeks ago, on virgin 8.2, initial run of
>
> portsnap fetch extract
>
> ... ran great, and a couple of updates since then, also.
>
> but today:
>
> # portsnap fetch
> Lo
Never had a problem before
Freebsd 8.2
a couple weeks ago, on virgin 8.2, initial run of
portsnap fetch extract
... ran great, and a couple of updates since then, also.
but today:
# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from
Since today's morning I receive on every box this message shown below
while doing a 'portsnap fetch'.
What's wrong and how to repair?
Regards,
Oliver
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetchi
Hello.
I think I should correct myself as what I found that way was unexpected, even
after aside from portsnap.
2011/06/15 06:51:32 +0400 Peter Vereshagin => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV> GL> cvs -d :ext:anon...@anoncvs1.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs export -D 2010-10-01
PV>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:44:30 +0400
Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
> 2011/06/15 08:51:22 +0100 RW => To
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
> R> > - From what I see in /var/db/portsnap/files/ it keeps every file
> R> &g
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 08:51:22 +0100 RW => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
R> > - From what I see in /var/db/portsnap/files/ it keeps every file it
R> > had ever downloaded: they all have different times.
R>
R> It doe
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:34:34 +0400
Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
> 2011/06/14 17:17:39 -0700 Chuck Swiger => To Peter
> Vereshagin :
> CS> > Does it keep
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/14 20:59:33 -0400 Greg Larkin => To Peter
Vereshagin :
GL> > How can I extract an 'old' snapshot from portsnap database?
GL> > Does it keep them? Does portsnap keep snapshots fetched previously?
G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/14/11 8:09 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
>
> How can I extract an 'old' snapshot from portsnap database?
> Does it keep them? Does portsnap keep snapshots fetched
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/14 17:17:39 -0700 Chuck Swiger => To Peter Vereshagin
:
CS> > Does it keep them? Does portsnap keep snapshots fetched previously?
CS> As far as I can tell, you can
On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
>
> How can I extract an 'old' snapshot from portsnap database?
> Does it keep them? Does portsnap keep snapshots fetched previously?
As far as I can tell, you c
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
How can I extract an 'old' snapshot from portsnap database?
Does it keep them? Does portsnap keep snapshots fetched previously?
Suppose I need the particular port or the whole tree as of the specified date
and time?
Or, if I need
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
Th
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
Th
2011-04-03 18:35 keltezéssel, Paul Chany írta:
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network
problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process
2011-04-03 16:19 keltezéssel, Matthew Seaman írta:
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
Th
On 03/04/2011 14:45, Paul Chany wrote:
> I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
>
> Whenever I try to run command
> # portsnap fetch extract
>
> the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
>
> The computer on wich
Hi,
I'm trying to fetch portsnap but can't because probably of network problem.
Whenever I try to run command
# portsnap fetch extract
the process stall and never reach 20%. It is sad. :(
The computer on wich I try to run this command is on my home LAN
that has a gateway/router.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:49:14AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:00:55 +0100
> Alain G. Fabry articulated:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Whenever I try to do a portsnap, it tels me metadata is corrupt.
> >
> > harley# portsnap fetch update
> >
1 - 100 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
