RW <rwmaillists <at> googlemail.com> writes: > ... > > ... > > So, why did it do so much work (ca. 5 min, 24085 patches), even > > claiming to have applied patches, before telling me the env was not > > properly set up ? jb > > You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed. > > "fetch" downloads and applies patches to the compressed > snapshot. "update" uses the compressed snapshot to update a > pre-existing ports tree created by an "extract" > ...
OK. But this looks like a flaky entry validation - it should be rejected up front as invalid entry, even if it applied to the second part - "update". Because the effect of processing the entire entry "fetch" plus "update" is lost anyway. jb _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
