On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 +0000 (UTC) jb wrote:
> > You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed. > > > > "fetch" downloads and applies patches to the compressed > > snapshot. "update" uses the compressed snapshot to update a > > pre-existing ports tree created by an "extract" > > ... > > OK. > But this looks like a flaky entry validation - it should be rejected > up front as invalid entry, even if it applied to the second part - > "update". Because the effect of processing the entire entry "fetch" > plus "update" is lost anyway. Not isn't, you've brought the snapshot up to date. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
