Thanks, guys, for the information. This is really helpful.
Giorgos, just apologizing that I used the word "level-headed". In
hindsight "more informative" would have been more appropriate.
I'm currently using PC-BSD - and the journey so far has been tremendous.
Happy to be part of the BSD world ;
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:05:35PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:45:30PM -0600, John Smith wrote:
>
> > I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
> > a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I
> > don't have a s
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:45:30PM -0600, John Smith wrote:
> I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
> a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I
> don't have a spare machine?
>
> My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is
On 2007-11-10 15:45, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Nov 10, 2007 9:40 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
>>> nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd.
>>>
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:45:30PM -0600, John Smith wrote:
> I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
> a newbie supposed to know the differenced
Both nanobsd and picobsd have manual pages. Try 'man nanobsd' and 'man
picobsd'.
Picobsd has been superseded by nanobsd
John Smith wrote:
I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I
don't have a spare machine?
My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is called
FreeBSD-Questions, so why can't I asked a r
I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is
a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I
don't have a spare machine?
My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is called
FreeBSD-Questions, so why can't I asked a reasonable question a
On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
> nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd.
>
> They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image
> that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right?
Wha
Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd.
They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image
that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right?
I've searched the internet but can't really find a page that clearly
ex
