I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I don't have a spare machine?
My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is called FreeBSD-Questions, so why can't I asked a reasonable question and expect a reasonable reply...? On Nov 10, 2007 9:40 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between > > nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd. > > > > They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image > > that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right? > > What don't you experiment with them, and see? :) > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
