@all
I notice that some of the packages that *are* missing have different
names, for instance
pdfnup is available on FreeBSD ports -> /usr/ports/print/pdfjam/
psnup is available on FreeBSD ports -> /usr/ports/print/psutils-letter/
These are automagically installed if one installs TeXLive full s
>> http://tobi.oetiker.ch/lshort/lshort-5.01.src.tar.gz
>>
>> ran gmake and I see the errors.
>>
>
> One error is that in src/ folder, the file lshort-letter.tex does not
> exist :(, if we cd to that folder and copy the lshort-a5.tex
> lshort-letter.tex then it will build provided most of the other
> http://pastebin.com/23RCus2a
>
> http://tobi.oetiker.ch/lshort/lshort-5.01.src.tar.gz
>
> ran gmake and I see the errors.
>
One error is that in src/ folder, the file lshort-letter.tex does not
exist :(, if we cd to that folder and copy the lshort-a5.tex
lshort-letter.tex then it will build prov
> If you are using TeXLive, first check if a TeXLive package for what you want
> exists. First tell tlmgr(1) to use a CTAN mirror:
>
> tlmgr option repository http://mirror.ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet
>
> Then list all packages available:
>
> tlmgr list|less
>
> The packages you have insta
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> I have been using TeX for a while and I have never had to set up
> anthing like this :( I had used MikTeX in winblow$ and TeTeX in linux
> distros and FreeBSD 5.3/FreeBSD6.2, and I had never had to mess with
> TDS.
I know, thi
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> I have been using TeX for a while and I have never had to set up
> anthing like this :( I had used MikTeX in winblow$ and TeTeX in linux
> distros and FreeBSD 5.3/FreeBSD6.2, and I had never had to mess with
> TDS.
>
> This is w
>> Which is this directory?
>
> I assumed you know.
>
> If you've got the full teTeX installation,
> start with
>
> % texdoc tds
>
> tds (TDS) stands for Tex Directory Structure.
> This is a sort of a standard on how tex
> tree should be organised. teTeX tree
> adheres to TDS convention.
>
> texdoc
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:41:13PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>|-libraries
>|---math
>|---systemlayer
>|---utilities
>|-phaistos
>|-shadethm
>|---plain
>|-pgf
>|---basiclayer
>|---frontendlayer
>|---math
>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >> Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
> >> get it to compile
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
>> get it to compile properly :(
>>
>> http://www.mecmath.net/trig/
>
> This took some time. I ha
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
> get it to compile properly :(
>
> http://www.mecmath.net/trig/
This took some time. I had to update nomencl:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/co
> If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
> please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
> teTeX as far as possible with no major
> changes to TDS, i.e. just adding or updating
> a package.
>
> --
Anton & et all,
The famous lshort by Tobias Oetiker fails to compile with TeTeX
freeb
Anton & et all,
I have found another book diffyqs that does not compile with default
teTeX, but does with TeXLive:
Book is found here:
http://www.jirka.org/diffyqs/
Source is here:
http://www.jirka.org/diffyqs/diffyqs.tar.gz
I create build script:
/*** build script **/
#!/b
Anton & et all,
> hrs@ has been most speedy and helpful. He added
>
> print/latex-chapterfolder
> print/tex-mfpic
>
> With these 2 new ports + teTeX I can build this book
> fully, no errors. Check it out.
>
> If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
> please send me the details. I'm k
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
> > please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
> > teTeX as far as possible with no major
> > changes to TDS, i.e.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
> > please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
> > teTeX as far as possible with no major
> > changes to TDS, i.e.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
> please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
> teTeX as far as possible with no major
> changes to TDS, i.e. just adding or updating
> a package.
If TeXlive is (or becomes) "the
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > >> > I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
> > >>
> > >> I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
> > >> 2009 release whe
Hello,
I've not really followed this message but I ran (nearly) into the same problem.
I also need latex! But I don't want to use tetex because I am used to texlive.
So, I downloaded the texlive ISO Image and installed it with the included
script:
http://www.tug.org/texlive/acquire-iso.html
> Yes, I'm aware of this, but texlive
> is not an option for me, unless and
> until it appears in the port tree.
> But I'm also aware of the "step up
> or shut up" reality, so I shut up.
As Frank pointed out, It's common to have more than one TeX distribution
installed. I have had TeTex and TeXli
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:19:13PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > > > I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
> > > > can instal
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >> > I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
> >>
> >> I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
> >> 2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
> >> installation i
Frank Shute wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:54:26PM +, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > ... For regular things, TeTeX is fine, but for bigger projects
> > one can't do without texlive. I encountered the same problems
> > with default tetex, but installed TeXLive from DVD and I no
> > longer h
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > > I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
> > > can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
> >
> > I would
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:54:26PM +, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Anton,
>
> This is what I mean. For regular things, TeTeX is fine, but for
> bigger projects one can't do without texlive. I encountered the same
> problems with default tetex, but installed TeXLive from DVD and I no
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> >> > I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
>> >>
>> >> I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
>> >> 2009 release when FreeBSD bi
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >> > I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
> >>
> >> I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
> >> 2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
> >> installation i
>> > I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
>>
>> I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
>> 2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
>> installation is headache-free.
>>
>
> What exactly is missing from teTeX?
Try this, get t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
> > can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
>
> I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and
> amd64 in t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
> > can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
>
> I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and
> amd64 in t
> I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
> can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and amd64
in the 2010 release and installing it is really easy.
> I hoped for a true native
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Jeff Hamann wrote:
> I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running
> into this error.
>
> I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
>
> freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
> FreeBSD freebsd-82-amd64.localdomain
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:53:55PM -0700, Jeff Hamann wrote:
> I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running
> into this error.
>
> I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
>
> freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
> FreeBSD freebsd-82-amd64.l
I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running into
this error.
I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-82-amd64.localdomain 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu
Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 201
34 matches
Mail list logo
