Tim Kellers writes:
> Someplace between Firefox 3.5 and 4.0 I changed from diablo to openjdk.
>
> That:
> ln -s /usr/local/openjdk6/jre/lib/IcedTeaPlugin.so ~/.mozilla/plugins/
>
> was the missing step for me.
I tried this, and discovered that - at least for SeaMonkey - I
had to
This link explains it pretty well:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21010
Someplace between Firefox 3.5 and 4.0 I changed from diablo to openjdk.
It was 3.6. Check the archives for considerable gnashing of teeth as we
tried to figure out how to get Java working again.
ln -s /us
On 03/31/11 11:06, John Levine wrote:
In article<4d948902.6000...@wallnet.com> you write:
Before I attempt to (re)invent the java wheel in Firefox 4...
Is there any documentation about how to enable java support already
written or available. If there isn't, does anyone have any hints?
It's
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Tim Kellers wrote:
> Before I attempt to (re)invent the java wheel in Firefox 4...
>
> Is there any documentation about how to enable java support already written
> or available. If there isn't, does anyone have any hints?
>
As always, the FreeBSD Handbook is wh
In article <4d948902.6000...@wallnet.com> you write:
>Before I attempt to (re)invent the java wheel in Firefox 4...
>
>Is there any documentation about how to enable java support already
>written or available. If there isn't, does anyone have any hints?
It's unchanged from 3.6, or at least, when
Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
> Is it necessary to install libxul for enabling java plugin in firefox3.6?
>
Excuse me. I use FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE i386, firefox3.6, openjdk6
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/java-plugin-for-firefox-tp31106239p31106351.html
Sent from the freebsd-q
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 16:59, xinyou yan wrote:
> $javac helloworld.java //No problem
> $java helloworld.class
It should be "java helloworld" (no extension).
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 314, Issue 3, Message: 22
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:08:34 -0400 Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:13:01 +1000 (EST)
> Ian Smith articulated:
>
> > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 314, Issue 1, Message: 33
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:08:24 -0400 Jerry
> > wro
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:19 PM, wrote:
> Firefox 3.6 needs Java 6 Update 10. [1]
>
> For now, as a newbie, I generally try not to install anything not in the
> ports collection. From there you can find some JREs, but none are at Update
> 10, including Linux emulation. [2] At this time, the highes
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:24:47 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
[ ... ]
I honestly enjoy satire. That said, it does not change the fact that a
serviceable version of Java, suitable for Firefox-3.6, does not exist
within the FreeBSD framework.
That's pretty
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
[ ... ]
> I honestly enjoy satire. That said, it does not change the fact that a
> serviceable version of Java, suitable for Firefox-3.6, does not exist within
> the FreeBSD framework.
That's pretty much accurate, if you don't want to consider running FF+
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:13:01 +1000 (EST)
Ian Smith articulated:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 314, Issue 1, Message: 33
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:08:24 -0400 Jerry
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:50:04 +0200
> > Harry Matthiesen Jensen articulated:
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 07, 201
>As this link (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10570) says, JAVA
>PLUGIN WONT WORK WITH FIREFOX 3.6.
>I tried to use linux-sun-jdk16 port, but the plugin didn t work too.
>Is there an workaround or anybody that knows how-to use java plugin within
>firefox 3.6?
>Thanks in advance,
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:46:16 -0400, Harry Matthiesen Jensen
wrote:
The short answer would be "not yet possible" or "just wait, will come
later"... which in my "world" not is an answer anyone can use..
I've been looking for some indication as to how much later "later" is..
one week, one mon
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 314, Issue 1, Message: 33
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 06:08:24 -0400 Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:50:04 +0200
> Harry Matthiesen Jensen articulated:
>
>
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:20:08AM +, Márcio C.G. wrote:
> > >
> > > As this link (http://for
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 06:08:24AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> >
> > I just "portinstall firefox3", which right now will give you Firefox
> > 3.5.9, and java works ;-)
>
> The OP requested help with Firefox-3.6, not with older deprecated
>
I am fully aware of that...
The short answer would be "not ye
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:50:04 +0200
Harry Matthiesen Jensen articulated:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:20:08AM +, Márcio C.G. wrote:
> >
> > As this link (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10570)
> > says, JAVA PLUGIN WONT WORK WITH FIREFOX 3.6. I tried to use
> > linux-sun-jdk16 port
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:20:08AM +, Márcio C.G. wrote:
>
> As this link (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10570) says, JAVA
> PLUGIN WONT WORK WITH FIREFOX 3.6.
> I tried to use linux-sun-jdk16 port, but the plugin didn t work too.
> Is there an workaround or anybody that knows ho
On 03/06/10 16:57, Jerry wrote:
> Please check out this URL:
>
> http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/firefox_newplugin.xml
>
> I believer that the FreeBSD version of Java is several versions behind
> that. Therefore, it would appear to be a FreeBSD problem.
>
I'll just wait for FreeBSD to upda
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:30:28 -0600
Programmer In Training articulated:
> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING the Java plugin does not work in
> FF3.6. Is this a Java issue, a FireFox issue or a FreeBSD issue? I
> just noticed this today as I was going through looking through it
> because of the thre
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:48:37PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:10:48PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
> > Freenet (http://www.freenetproject.org/) on my FreeBSD/amd64 system
> > complains about an old and vulnerable Java version:
> >
> > Your installed version of Java is vulnera
Greg Lewis writes:
> > Your installed version of Java is vulnerable to a severe remote
> > exploit (remote code execution!). You must upgrade to at least Java
> > 5 update 20 or Java 6 update 15 as soon as possible. Freenet has
> > disabled any plugins handling XML for the time being,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:10:48PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
> Freenet (http://www.freenetproject.org/) on my FreeBSD/amd64 system
> complains about an old and vulnerable Java version:
>
> Your installed version of Java is vulnerable to a severe remote
> exploit (remote code execution!). You must
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, AN wrote:
> I'm trying to configure java on FreeBSD 7-stable and Gnome 2.26.3, with
> Firefox35. I tried the following commands, but still no ability to view java
> applets.
>
> ln -s libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins
> ln -s libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/local
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:25:14 + (GMT)
AN wrote:
> I'm trying to configure java on FreeBSD 7-stable and Gnome 2.26.3,
> with Firefox35. I tried the following commands, but still no ability
> to view java applets.
>
> ln -s libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins
> ln -s libjavaplu
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Ott K?stner wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:54:32 +0300
> From: "[ISO-8859-1] Ott K?stner"
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: java jdk16 port
>
> Joe R. Jah wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I want to i
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:55:26 +0200
> From: Jochen Neumeister
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Joe R. Jah
> Subject: Re: java jdk16 port
>
> Am Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
> schrieb "Joe R. Jah&
Joe R. Jah wrote:
Hello all,
I want to install java jdk16 port. Make build spits this:
Seems, that you have not updated your ports tree before starting java
port install.
See
# pwd
/usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16
# cat distinfo
MD5 (diablo-latte-freebsd6-amd64-1.6.0_07-b02.tar.bz2) =
e32080
Am Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb "Joe R. Jah" :
> Hello all,
>
> I want to install java jdk16 port. Make build spits this:
>
> --8<--
> Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution
> manually.
>
> Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.j
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 22:34:52 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill
wrote:
I know that, since my printer speaks Postscript, I don't need CUPS.
But some of the ports I'm installing want to install CUPS as a
dependency. The first one I happened across was java/jdk16, but
In the last episode (May 06), Chris Hill said:
> I know that, since my printer speaks Postscript, I don't need CUPS. But
> some of the ports I'm installing want to install CUPS as a dependency.
> The first one I happened across was java/jdk16, but I'd be surprised if
> there weren't more.
>
> Cou
On Wed, 6 May 2009 22:34:52 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hill
wrote:
> I know that, since my printer speaks Postscript, I don't need CUPS. But
> some of the ports I'm installing want to install CUPS as a dependency.
> The first one I happened across was java/jdk16, but I'd be surprised if
> there weren'
It's also a lot more intense in the graphics department.
Runescape pretty much maxes out my system as well. My computer is
somewhat older 1.3ghz, with a cheap graphics card. Looking back through
the thread, I don't see any information on your hardware. Is it possible
that runescape simple push
Warren Liddell wrote:
>
> Are you getting 100% on something as simple as this?
> > http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
> >
> > My setup is exactly similar, but I run i386. No such problem.
> > I do get very high CPU usage when flash (gnash) is active though...
>
> No, that works quite
Warren Liddell wrote:
> Are you getting 100% on something as simple as this?
>> http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
>>
>> My setup is exactly similar, but I run i386. No such problem.
>> I do get very high CPU usage when flash (gnash) is active though...
>
> No, that works quite fine, b
Are you getting 100% on something as simple as this?
http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
My setup is exactly similar, but I run i386. No such problem.
I do get very high CPU usage when flash (gnash) is active though...
No, that works quite fine, but has very little graphics involve
Warren Liddell wrote:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Warren Liddell writes:
>>
>>
>>> After finally managing to get java working with FF i find when i goto
>>> use it now, it uses 100% of my CPU ... how can i fix this annoyinng
>>> issue ?
>>>
>>> Running FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE AMD64
>>>
>>
>> You
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Warren Liddell writes:
After finally managing to get java working with FF i find when i goto
use it now, it uses 100% of my CPU ... how can i fix this annoyinng issue ?
Running FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE AMD64
You don't mention what version of each you're running, or h
Warren Liddell writes:
> After finally managing to get java working with FF i find when i goto
> use it now, it uses 100% of my CPU ... how can i fix this annoyinng issue ?
>
> Running FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE AMD64
You don't mention what version of each you're running, or how you
installed the plugin
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:28:10AM -0800, mdh wrote:
>
> My advice is to install the following ports in the following order:
>
> java/jdk16
> java/eclipse-devel
Does licensing BS still require out-of-band agreement to EULAs on the Sun
website in 7.x, or has that finally changed for the better?
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Spiros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Java and FreeBSD
> To: "freebsd mailing list"
> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 1:26 PM
> Hi,
>
> It is now more than eight months that i am not able to use
> FreeBSD. Fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:31:14PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Andrew Gould wrote:
|> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|> |
|> |> -BEGIN
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:31:14PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Andrew Gould wrote:
>| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>|
>|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>|> Hash: SHA1
>|>
>|> - --
>|> Greg Larkin
>|> <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gould wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|>
|> All you are downloading is a tarball that can be extracted directly into
|> /usr/local. Once the packages are available, they will be posted to the
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew Gould wrote:
> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> |
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gould wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Dave wrote:
|> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
|> |> On Tuesday 2
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew Gould wrote:
> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> |
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gould wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Dave wrote:
|> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
|> |> On Tuesday 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:49:50PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Dave wrote:
|> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
|> |> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dave wrote:
> | On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
> |> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> |>> I read in _Absolute Fr
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:49:50PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Dave wrote:
>| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
>|> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>|>> I read in _Absolute FreeBSD_ that there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
|> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|>> I read in _Absolute FreeBSD_ that there is now an easy-to-install Java
|>> package for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:43:47PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote:
>On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I read in _Absolute FreeBSD_ that there is now an easy-to-install Java
>> package for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7.0, but I have so far not found this
>> package. Does it exist?
>
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 12:20:48 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I read in _Absolute FreeBSD_ that there is now an easy-to-install Java
> package for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7.0, but I have so far not found this
> package. Does it exist?
Yes. These packages are created. licensed and maintained by the Fre
Maybe in
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/7.0-RELEASE/packages/java/
?
Cheers
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:20 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read in _Absolute FreeBSD_ that there is now an easy-to-install Java package
> for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7.0, but I have so far not found th
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:54:02PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now that Java is opensource, I have looked for a Java package to install
> on 64-bit FreeBSD 7.0, but so far without success. Is there a simple and
> quick-to-install Java package for FreeBSD?
It's not completely done yet. Some b
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Camilo Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately after updating my portsnap; it did not work. Here is the
> error I get:
>
> $ firefox
> INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: SendRequest: Read of ack failed: 0
>
> System error?:: Unknown error: 0
> $ fir
e the
same error with and without that TZ package. Anyway, which firefox
version are your running? I'm using firefox 2.0.0.12.
--- On Tue, 6/10/08, Manolis Kiagias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Manolis Kiagias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Java Dilemma
>
Camilo Reyes wrote:
I am running a FreeBSD 7.0 system and I'm having the hardest time trying
to get java to work (I'm sure this has been brought up before - but a
google search did not reveal anything). My problem is that I can't find
the JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.3.0 that it mentions o
Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 21 March 2008 08:46 am, Dino
Vliet wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm lost at finding a solution for getting the java plugin to work
> in Firefox 2.11 on my AMD64 system running FreeBSD 6.3.
>
> I've upgraded my ports and the diablo-jdk version is:
> pkg_in
On Friday 21 March 2008 08:46 am, Dino Vliet wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm lost at finding a solution for getting the java plugin to work
> in Firefox 2.11 on my AMD64 system running FreeBSD 6.3.
>
> I've upgraded my ports and the diablo-jdk version is:
> pkg_info | grep diablo
> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.0
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Ulrich
Kruppa
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:05 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Java based Content Management Systems on FreeBSD?
Hi,
s
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Apitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:58 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Peter Ulrich Kruppa; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Java based Content Management Systems on FreeBSD?
>
>
&g
El día Saturday, March 15, 2008 a las 11:43:04PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
escribió:
...
> Java is write-once, run anywhere. As long as they run under the
> JDK that has been ported to FreeBSD then there's no problems.
>
> I know this is so because Sun Microsystems says so in their
> lite
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Ulrich
> Kruppa
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:05 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Java based Content Management Systems on FreeBSD?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> surfing the internet I a p
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 17:33 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I doubt this but is there anything that will take a foo.jar and turn in back
> into java? Or at least assembler?
A jar is an archive which contains multiple Java class files. So you
will need to extract the class files first
On 2008-02-18 17:33, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
> I doubt this but is there anything that will take a foo.jar and turn in back
> into java? Or at least assembler?
JAR files are usually ZIP archives [1], so you can extract them easily
with archivers/unzip or similar tools.
[1]
Gary Kline wrote:
Guys,
I doubt this but is there anything that will take a foo.jar and turn in back
into java? Or at least assembler?
gary
http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/javaprogramming/JAR/basics/
I went to google and typed: 'unpack jar'. There are many other results
that
Gary Kline wrote:
I doubt this but is there anything that will take a foo.jar and turn in back
into java? Or at least assembler?
This really isn't the place for such questions.
As to the question itself, Im no java man, but I think a jar is an
archive of classes, meaning you can extract
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:31:21 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:58:14 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:58:14 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have jdk1.6 (bootstrapped from diablo 1.5) installed and it
>> works fine for comma
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:58:14 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have jdk1.6 (bootstrapped from diablo 1.5) installed and it works
> fine for command line/swing apps but dies on applets in firefox
> 2.0.0.11 (both from ports
On Wed, 30 May 2007 12:00:53 +0200
"n j" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I completely agree that Sun's licence is a hassle. Fortunately, in a
> year or two, we're going to have an open source Java platform meaning
> there will be no hassle with manual download while installing JRE/JDK.
> Combined wit
On 30/05/07, n j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess if everyone here on this list gives his/her two cents to this
> topic we're having a nice java advocacy flame war. ;-)
The main characteristic of a flame war is to disparage other people's
arguments while maintaining that your arguments are t
On 30/05/07, Vladimir Tsvetkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When we talk about portability of User Interface applications with rich
interactivity we must also put into disscusion Adobe Flash and Adobe Flex
applications.
Adobe is working on its Apollo platform (huge part of it is open source -
http
I guess if everyone here on this list gives his/her two cents to this
topic we're having a nice java advocacy flame war. ;-)
The main characteristic of a flame war is to disparage other people's
arguments while maintaining that your arguments are the best, no?
That's why I'm not going to try and
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:56:39PM +0200, n j wrote:
> >I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
> >just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
> >frontend on it and call it a day. However, I am starting to write a
> >good amount of code
Christian Walther wrote:
I guess if everyone here on this list gives his/her two cents to this
topic we're having a nice java advocacy flame war. ;-)
Well, yes. That's why I didn't answer any more. We are talking opinions
and everyone has his own. And we are going OT.
So if one wants to
Le 29/05/2007 à 14:04:41+0200, Christian Walther a écrit
> On 29/05/07, n j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
> > > just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
> > > frontend on it and call it a d
O/H Ghirai έγραψε:
I would say Python would be more suitable (smaller, faster), plus it's
installed by default on quite a few *nix OS.
I would say, use any language you guys want, but I would like the final
product to be a console-only app, thank you :)
--
RTFM and STFW before anything bad
Hello,
> I've never seen a complex java application that was usable on
> different platforms. This includes stuff from IBM, EMC, Sun, BMC and
> other big players. I know because I ask all the time. Me and my
> collegues are using Suns "Sunray" thin clients for daily work...
Not only have I seen s
Hello n,
Tuesday, May 29, 2007, 1:56:39 PM, you wrote:
>> I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
>> just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
>> frontend on it and call it a day. However, I am starting to write a
>> good amount of
On 29/05/07, n j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
> just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
> frontend on it and call it a day. However, I am starting to write a
> good amount of code in java an
I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
frontend on it and call it a day. However, I am starting to write a
good amount of code in java and was wondering what others think about
java as the d
Tom Grove wrote:
I am wanting to write a gui frontend to pkg_cutleaves. I see that it is
just a simple perl script so, it would be quite simple to just put a gtk
frontend on it and call it a day. However, I am starting to write a
good amount of code in java and was wondering what others think
"RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all i am getting this error when trying to install java jdk15 from the
> ports. please help and thank you in advance
>
> acpi0_check: nexus0
> attachedom/sun/jmx/mbeanserver/MBeanInstantiatorImpl.java:162: warning:
> non-varargs call o
AN wrote:
I just downloaded and installed the 2 packages from the
freebsdfoundation.org website, diablo-jre-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz
and diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz. However, when I restart
Seamonkey or Firefox Java is not enabled.
There were no messages after the packages
On Thursday 11 January 2007 00:51, eoghan wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote:
> > eoghan wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
> >> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
> >> I have installed:
> >> diablo-jdk-5.0
> >> diablo-jre1.5.
> Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 160, Issue 12
> Message: 28
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:10:00 +
> From: eoghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:35, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > eoghan wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
On 10 Jan 2007, at 23:09, Peter Giessel wrote:
On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 02:04PM, "eoghan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote:
eoghan wrote:
Hi
Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
for firefox? Im running 6.1 on am
On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:35, Garrett Cooper wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eoghan wrote:
Hi
Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
for
firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
I have installed:
diablo-jdk-5.0
diablo-jre1.5.0
linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8
lin
On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, at 02:04PM, "eoghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote:
>
>> eoghan wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
>>> for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
out of curiosity, did you insta
On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:26, Vince Hoffman wrote:
eoghan wrote:
Hi
Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working
for firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
I have installed:
diablo-jdk-5.0
diablo-jre1.5.0
linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8
linux-sun-jdk1.4.2
when i try to access a java app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eoghan wrote:
> Hi
> Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working for
> firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
> I have installed:
> diablo-jdk-5.0
> diablo-jre1.5.0
> linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8
> linux-sun-jdk1.4.2
> when i try to access
eoghan wrote:
Hi
Does anyone have a guide or advice for getting java plugin working for
firefox? Im running 6.1 on amd.
I have installed:
diablo-jdk-5.0
diablo-jre1.5.0
linux-blackdown-jre1.1.8
linux-sun-jdk1.4.2
when i try to access a java app from firefox im always presented with
the plugin
On 12/14/06, probsd org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have the linux-seamonkey port built and I am trying
to
add the java plugin. I installed the java/diablo-jre15
and made a symlink from
/usr/local/diablo-jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
to /usr/local/lib/linux-seamonkey/plugins/ as
Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: probsd org wrote:
>Hey group. I'm using the latest Firefox2 (non-linux) and have the latest
>diablo-jre15 port installed. I'm finding that the plugin for firefox causes
>firefox to freeze consistently. For example, when accessing myspace, as soon
>as I
probsd org wrote:
Hey group. I'm using the latest Firefox2 (non-linux) and have the latest
diablo-jre15 port installed. I'm finding that the plugin for firefox causes
firefox to freeze consistently. For example, when accessing myspace, as soon as
I click on Myspace's mail link firefox will fr
Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Any suggestions?
>> I just built jdk15 with the default options, and the Java plugin
>> works
>> in my firefox.
>>
>>> Secondly, is there a way to just build the plugin since I have
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Any suggestions?
I just built jdk15 with the default options, and the Java plugin works
in my firefox.
Secondly, is there a way to just build the plugin since I have the jdk
built and installed?
It looks possible, but (to me
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
