On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, O. Hartmann wrote:
FF is in my case 24, too:
pkg info firefox
firefox-24.0,1
Have you done updating the ports regarding
20130929
in /usr/ports/UPDATING? I did on all boxes and on all boxes I did the
tab-stickyness is present.
Firefox 24 allows tab moves for me on both
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 10:23:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
> > I have a 10-CURRENT r255948 from October 1st, with all ports from head
> > too, rev. r328930.
> >
> > FF is version 24.0 in the r328930 ports and the tabs can be moved fine
> > with drag and drop.
> >
> > HIH
> >
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:50:48 +0200
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann
> escribió:
>
> >
> > After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> > rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
> > know
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
>
> After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
> rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
> know whether this has to do with the "great pixman update", because
> coincide
On 10/02/13 14:49, Gary Kline wrote:
> well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
> other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of
> getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling
> both browsers? oh, and if ther
Hey Gary,
Try launching FireFox in a terminal emulator, do you get an error
message related to cubeb_refill_stream? To fix the error
try either setting media.use_cubeb -> false in about:config
or rebuild audio/alsa-plugins with ARIFF_OSS disabled.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:25:41AM -0600, Gary Ai
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 07:53:13 +0200
Leslie Jensen articulated:
>
>
> 2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
> > Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
> >
> > http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
> >
> > nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
> > that Firefox
2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
W
On 2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry wrote:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:46:43 +0400
Boris Samorodov articulated:
> This works for me: Edit -> Prefernces -> Applications -> PDF:
> preview in Firefox. As well as other viewer (mupdf tested).
> My current Firefox version is 22.0 though. But I recall it
> working at previous firefox versions.
I have
28.06.2013 21:07, Jerry пишет:
> Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
>
> http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
>
> nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
> that Firefox did anything at all.
>
> Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Fi
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
> stop. Which do you use?
Opera. No, really. :-)
> I tend to use chromium although I still will
> probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:01:39 -0300
Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
> "Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently
> > slow or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I
> > still will probably go back to
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow
> or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still
> will probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more
> firefox like.
>
> than
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still will
probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more firefox like.
thanks
ed
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Mikhail Krutov wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:01:00PM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> What if you make it a gmirror with a ramdisk, with the mirror syncing on
> boot and preferring the ramdisk? It's still a hack, but is it more
> manageable?
The problem is, automatic hack is still a kludgy hack.
Actualy cause of which
On 4/29/2013 5:06 AM, Mikhail Krutov wrote:
~ 5 seconds on kinda sligthly better machine;
~ 0.1 seconds if I move ~/.mozilla to tmpfs (which is a kludge and which
sucks)
What if you make it a gmirror with a ramdisk, with the mirror syncing on
boot and preferring the ramdisk? It's still a hack
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Robert Huff wrote:
David Demelier writes:
On my machine : intel i3 540, 2G of RAM and FreeBSD 9.1 it takes
around 12 secondes to start. Is it so long for you too?
Additional data point:
System:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r248938: Sun Mar 31 06:24:42 EDT
2013/4/29 Roland Smith :
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
>> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
>> it take to start.
>>
>> On my machine : intel i3 5
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
> it take to start.
>
> On my machine : intel i3 540, 2G of RAM and FreeBSD 9.1 it
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
> around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
> it take to start.
The ugly fact is that every browser is slow. Except for br
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:52:51 +0100,
Leslie Jensen a écrit :
> Quite some time ago there was a solution posted where you had to go
> to addons and install from a file. The language file is downloaded
> to distfiles/xpi. So you just point to the file and choose to
> install it.
Yes this is the w
Quite some time ago there was a solution posted where you had to go to addons
and install from a file. The language file is downloaded to distfiles/xpi. So
you just point to the file and choose to install it.
And if I remember correctly you also have to set the language again in
about:config
H
07.11.2012 14:27, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
> Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
> Boris Samorodov a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
>>> For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
>>> be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
>>>
>>> I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/f
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
Boris Samorodov a écrit :
Hi,
> > For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
> > be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
> >
> > I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
> > extract), then I add the .xpi v
06.11.2012 23:34, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
> Hello,
>
> For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to be
> in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
>
> I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
> extract), then I add the .xpi via the firefox addons m
Mario Lobo writes:
> 2012/9/4 Warren Block
>
>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>>>
All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> "Selectively updating ports is not supported". Then I must wonder why do
> we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a
> mandatory ports-all.
The reason is that you can safely ignore port categories for
languages a
2012/9/4 Warren Block
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
>>> Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
>>>
>>> As for my /etc/make.conf
>>>
>>>
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=nocona
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10
OVERRIDE_L
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote:
>
> First, thanks for replying !
>
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Mario Lobo writes:
> >
> > > env:
> > > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> > > Firefox 15 port
> > >
> > > The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
> > >
First, thanks for replying !
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Mario Lobo writes:
>
> > env:
> > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> > Firefox 15 port
> >
> > The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
> >
> > The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be
Mario Lobo writes:
> env:
> FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
> Firefox 15 port
>
> The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
>
> The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and
> configure stops.
> After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this:
>
> -L/us
On 09/04/2012 10:29 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Thank Alexander but been there, done that.
pkg_info | grep pkg
pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib
Hopefully, somebody else on the list will be of more help than I have been.
__
2012/9/4 Alexander Kapshuk
>
> This might help...
>
> /usr/ports/UPDATING
>
> 20120726:
> AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config
> AUTHOR: b...@freebsd.org
>
> devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf
>
> # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config
> or
> # portupgrade -fo
On 09/04/2012 08:11 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
/bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true
mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or
directory
/bin/rm
+++ Polytropon [23/08/12 19:17 +0200]:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:41:41 -0400, david coder wrote:
it's happened already: in another post here, polytropon gives a more central
role to /var/db/ports/png/options. if i understand him correctly, "make
showconfig" executed in /usr/ports/graphics/png rea
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:41:41 -0400, david coder wrote:
> it's happened already: in another post here, polytropon gives a more central
> role to /var/db/ports/png/options. if i understand him correctly, "make
> showconfig" executed in /usr/ports/graphics/png reads from that file.
> changes made th
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:26:18 -0400, david coder wrote:
> +++ Jamie Paul Griffin [23/08/12 07:54 +0100]:
> >[ Polytropon wrote on Thu 23.Aug'12 at 2:00:15 +0200 ]
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:43:55 -0400, david coder wrote:
> >> > thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
> >> >
> >>
+++ david coder [23/08/12 12:26 -0400]:
+++ Jamie Paul Griffin [23/08/12 07:54 +0100]:
[ Polytropon wrote on Thu 23.Aug'12 at 2:00:15 +0200 ]
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:43:55 -0400, david coder wrote:
> thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
> > unfortunately, though i've got the png
+++ Jamie Paul Griffin [23/08/12 07:54 +0100]:
[ Polytropon wrote on Thu 23.Aug'12 at 2:00:15 +0200 ]
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:43:55 -0400, david coder wrote:
> thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
>
> unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
>
> OPTIONS=
[ Polytropon wrote on Thu 23.Aug'12 at 2:00:15 +0200 ]
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:43:55 -0400, david coder wrote:
> > thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
> >
> > unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
> >
> > OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
>
+++ Dan Nelson [22/08/12 19:01 -0500]:
In the last episode (Aug 22), david coder said:
thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
This line just tells you what the defau
In the last episode (Aug 22), david coder said:
> thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
>
> unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
>
> OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
This line just tells you what the default is on a system that hasn't built
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:43:55 -0400, david coder wrote:
> thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
>
> unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
>
> OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
That should be the default. Anyway, you can always check which
optio
thx, i hadn't seen the reply to my earlier message.
unfortunately, though i've got the png port installed w/
OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
the install of freebsd fails w/ the error message given below.
is there something else required in the png makefile or elsewhere
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:01:50 -0400, david coder wrote:
> is there a system png that comes w/ 8.3 that is distinct from the ports png?
> if not, how explain that install of firefox-14.0.1 fails w/ the error message
> that the system png does not support APNG even though the makefile for the
> png po
== John Levine wrote on Mon 13.Aug'12 at 5:41:52 - ==
> Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
>
> In article <20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan> you write:
did you select the option to use optimised CFLAGS when you run make
config in the port dire
Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
In article <20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan> you write:
>I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as
>needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function
>nsNSSErrors.cpp. The e
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, the wise david coder wrote:
same problem. so i rebuilt png w/
OPTIONS= APNG "Animated PNG support" On
firefox build still fails because of complaints about APNG. what am i
missing here?
i'm running 8.3, btw, less than a month old.
david coder
My guess is th
On Tue, 30 Jul 2012, John Levine wrote:
In article <20120730045308.gh7...@mail3.dcoder.net> you write:
same problem. so i rebuilt png w/
OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
firefox build still fails because of complaints about APNG. what am i missing
here?
I rebuilt p
In article <20120730045308.gh7...@mail3.dcoder.net> you write:
>same problem. so i rebuilt png w/
>
> OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
>
>firefox build still fails because of complaints about APNG. what am i missing
>here?
I rebuilt png with APNG turned on (make && make
same problem. so i rebuilt png w/
OPTIONS=APNG "Animated PNG support" On
firefox build still fails because of complaints about APNG. what am i missing
here?
i'm running 8.3, btw, less than a month old.
david coder
+++ Christian Weisgerber [27/07/12 19:19 +]:
Dan
On Jun 11, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Subhro Sankha Kar wrote:
> Hello Sean,
>
> Can you run FF from a terminal and report back what you see?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Subhro Sankha Kar
> System Administrator
> Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
>
Thank you for the reply.
I have cured the problem.
T
Hello Sean,
Can you run FF from a terminal and report back what you see?
Thanks
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
On 11-Jun-2012, at 1:44 AM, sean wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>I just upgraded Firefox to the latest available in ports.
> Since th
2012-05-11 12:48, fake fake skrev:
$firefox
returns this:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so:
Undefined symbol "posix_fallocate"
It seems failed to link, but how to solve this?
System Information
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE
amd64
Reinstall sqlite3.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:29:40 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block articulated:
>On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Jong-Beom Kim wrote:
>
>> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 last night and so far, so good except
>> firefox installation.
>>
>> it simply doesn't build with this message.
>>
>> # make install clean
>> ===> firefo
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Beat Gätzi wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Jong-Beom Kim wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 last night and so far, so good except firefox
installation.
it simply doesn't build with this message.
# make install clean
===> firefox-12.0,1 is marked as broken: does not
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Jong-Beom Kim wrote:
I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 last night and so far, so good except firefox
installation.
it simply doesn't build with this message.
# make install clean
===> firefox-12.0,1 is marked as broken: does not build.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Jong-Beom Kim wrote:
> I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 last night and so far, so good except firefox
> installation.
>
> it simply doesn't build with this message.
>
> # make install clean
> ===> firefox-12.0,1 is marked as broken: does not build.
> *** Error code 1
>
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox.
is it just me or is firefox really broken currently?
or maybe it finally got market as such ;)
As well as many other browsers.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:41:45PM +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what do you get if you now type:
> > >
> > > /usr/local/bin/firefox3
> > >
>
21.09.2011 01:00, Chris Whitehouse пишет:
> On 20/09/2011 15:04, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
On 20/09/2011 15:04, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Sht
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
afabry@desmo 15:45 % sudo find / -name firefox3
/usr/local/lib/firefox3
/var/db/ports/firefox3
only finds 2 matches for firefox3, nothing in /usr/local/bin
Have you changed default settings, like changing LOCALBASE or DESTDIR?
Is it installing in a
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >
> > So, what do you get if you now type:
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/firefox3
> >
> > or
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/firefox
> >
> > --
> What I mentioned before ;
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 20,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >
> > Seems to be ok here ??
> >
> > afabry@desmo 15:22 % pkg_info -Lx firefox-3 | grep b
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:40:42PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 20,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:53:06AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:53:06AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> > >
> > > >I've installed both firefox and fire
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:53:06AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> >
> > >I've installed both firefox and firefox36. Neither of them can be found on
> > >the system while the installation
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:53:06AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> >I've installed both firefox and firefox36. Neither of them can be found on
> >the system while the installation build and installed without errors
> >
> >afabry@desmo 13:40 % pkg_info |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
I've installed both firefox and firefox36. Neither of them can be found on the
system while the installation build and installed without errors
afabry@desmo 13:40 % pkg_info | grep firefox
firefox-3.6.22,1Web browser based on the browser portion o
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:52:41AM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've installed Firefox36 from ports, it installed without a problem but it
> >does not launch. In other words, there's no firefox file on my system.
> >Had it installed b
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
I've installed Firefox36 from ports, it installed without a problem but it
does not launch. In other words, there's no firefox file on my system.
Had it installed before and working, then to clean out the system with
unnecessary ports, I remo
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 08:23:19AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I too had the problem of "Command not found" after freshly installing
> something from ports, but I thought that was a peculiarity of FreeBSD
> 9.0-BETA1 and 2.
>
> I was going to post this question to freebsd-current list.
>
> F
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:01:52AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've installed Firefox36 from ports, it installed without a problem but it
> >does not launch. In other words, there's no firefox file on my system.
> >Had it installed be
I too had the problem of "Command not found" after freshly installing something
from ports, but I thought that was a peculiarity of FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 and 2.
I was going to post this question to freebsd-current list.
For instance, if I typed "which lynx", it was not found, but was found if I ran
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello,
I've installed Firefox36 from ports, it installed without a problem but it does
not launch. In other words, there's no firefox file on my system.
Had it installed before and working, then to clean out the system with
unnecessary ports, I remov
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Carmel wrote:
I am trying to figure out why some video files play fine while others
simply do not work at all. This would be the latest example:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-11-2011/lactate-intolerance
Works here on 8.2-stable i386, Firefox 6. Remember to
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:12:56 -0400
Carmel wrote:
> I am trying to figure out why some video files play fine while others
> simply do not work at all. This would be the latest example:
>
> http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-11-2011/lactate-intolerance
>
> It works fine on a Windows mac
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Carmel wrote:
> I am trying to figure out why some video files play fine while others
> simply do not work at all. This would be the latest example:
>
> http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-11-2011/lactate-intolerance
>
I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #22: S
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Carmel wrote:
> I am trying to figure out why some video files play fine while others
> simply do not work at all. This would be the latest example:
>
> http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-11-2011/lactate-intolerance
>
Video plays perfectly for me on rec
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 3:01 PM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Teske, Devin
> Subject: Re: Firefox-4.0.1,1 on 8.1-RELEASE
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Devin Teske wro
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Devin Teske wrote:
I'm trying to compile /usr/ports/www/firefox on FreeBSD-8.1, to no avail. I keep
running into this error:
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-2.0/parser/html'
nsHt
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Venturoli
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 1:08 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Firefox 3 and 4 with NFS home director
On 06/20/11 21:55, Devin Teske wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has been able to test Firefox 4 on NFS $HOME.
I had problems in the past with Firefox 3, but they are gone.
Firefox 4 also works.
Right now I'm using 8.1, but I don't remember if this was what solved.
In any case, have you got stat
BREAKTHROUGH!!
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Devin Teske
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: Gautham Ganapathy
> Cc: FreeBSD
> Subject: Re: Firefox URL Address Ba
On May 8, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I hope that you can offer some suggestions to help make some sense of this
>> odd situation. The situation is that we install FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE onto
>> standard Intel
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> On my system that I have updated to 8.2-RELEASE-amd64 I get mistake if I try
> to
> # pkg_add -r firefox
>
> pkg_add: package 'perl-5.10.1_3.tbz... Done.
> pkg_add: package 'perl-5.10.1_3.tbz conflicts with perl-5.12.3
>
On Mon, 09 May 2011 03:37:28 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Janos Dohanics wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >> >
> >> > And it's not a requirement. I've never seen that issue, or
> >> > enabled the fix although firefox is my primary browser.
> >>
> >> These options are present in the GENERIC kernel and you
Janos Dohanics wrote:
[snip]
>> >
>> > And it's not a requirement. I've never seen that issue, or enabled
>> > the fix although firefox is my primary browser.
>>
>> These options are present in the GENERIC kernel and you probably did
>> not remove them. My guess is the OP did and never realized
On Sun, 08 May 2011 14:55:58 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Janos Dohanics
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Rebuilt the kernel with "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES" and Firefox
> >> now works fine.
> >>
> >> Since this option seems to be required for
On Sun, 8 May 2011 13:32:47 -0500
Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Janos Dohanics
> wrote:
>
> > Rebuilt the kernel with "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES" and Firefox
> > now works fine.
> >
> > Since this option seems to be required for Firefox (and perhaps for
> > other po
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I hope that you can offer some suggestions to help make some sense of this
> odd situation. The situation is that we install FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE onto
> standard Intel workstation hardware. We then add about 400 packages to the
>
Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Janos Dohanics wrote:
>
>> Rebuilt the kernel with "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES" and Firefox now
>> works fine.
>>
>> Since this option seems to be required for Firefox (and perhaps for
>> other ports?), shouldn't /usr/ports/UPDATING or /u
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Janos Dohanics wrote:
> Rebuilt the kernel with "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES" and Firefox now
> works fine.
>
> Since this option seems to be required for Firefox (and perhaps for
> other ports?), shouldn't /usr/ports/UPDATING or /usr/src/UPDATING
> reflect this?
>
On Fri, 06 May 2011 23:45:25 +0200
"Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011 09:31:57 -0400
> Janos Dohanics wrote:
>
> >After updating Firefox and all the ports it depends on,
> >firefox-4.0.1,1 crashes when trying to use any part of the toolbar
> >or the pull-down menu.
> >
> >I have po
Devin Teske writes:
> Hi list,
>
> I hope that you can offer some suggestions to help make some sense of this
> odd situation. The situation is that we install FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE onto
> standard Intel workstation hardware. We then add about 400 packages to the
> system. On top of that, we the
1 - 100 of 673 matches
Mail list logo
