Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
>
> # mptutil show adapter
> mpt0 Adapter:
>Board Name: UNUSED
>Board Assembly:
> Chip Name: C1068E
> Chip Revision: UNUSED
> RAID Levels: n
Dear Sir,
Please be kind enough to provide solution to the following problem.
I have an old, assembled desk top loaded with win7 ultimate. It has got 80
GB hard disk and 1 GB RAM. Earlier there was XP. That time CD drive was not
working at all. Subsequently I upgraded to win7. After few days
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
On 06/10/2013 04:51, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I figured I'd walk through those steps from start to finish and just
> correct my main problem and any other little glitches I might have.
>
> I'm on step 6 and when I run mergemaster -p, I get the following error.
>
> ***
question (as quoted
above) correctly, installing world from source has been
involved, that's why my suggestion of following the
instructions (or a subset of them, as it applies).
> While you are quoting the official instructions from /usr/src/UPDATING
> here (so they are completely
On 05/10/2013 21:41, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
>> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
>> be able to do a
>>
>> cd /usr/src
>> make buildworld
>> make installworld
>> reboot
>>
>> and I'll be running up on the
I figured I'd walk through those steps from start to finish and just
correct my main problem and any other little glitches I might have.
I'm on step 6 and when I run mergemaster -p, I get the following error.
*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
*** /var/tm
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
> be able to do a
>
> cd /usr/src
> make buildworld
> make installworld
> reboot
>
> and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel and then I'll be all set?
No. You s
Ah, yes, when this particular box was a 9.0-release, I had compiled a
custom kernel to enable ipsec. When I check the strings, it's a 9.1
release kernel.
I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
be able to do a
cd /usr/src
make buildworld
make installworld
rebo
On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
> 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
> doing
>
> freebsd-update fetch
> freebsd-update install
>
> I went right to
>
> freebsd-update upgr
I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
doing
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
I went right to
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE
freebsd-update install
rebooot
freebsd-upd
> From: hrkesh sahu
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530
> To: "Julian H. Stacey"
> Cc: Polytropon ,
> FreeBSD questions
Hi, No idea why it was To: me.
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I dislike MS & windows & quoted-prin
Hello.
Does anyone have a clue why kernel always directs ESP packets via
default route (or default gateway in FIB 0), even if there are other
FIBs with per-interface routes?
I'm stuck with the gateway, which is connected to 2 ISPs and the
necessity to configure IPSec tunnels on both external
Hi All,
I am facing a routing issue for the Interoperability 1.5 topology.
Please find the attachment of the exact topology map.
As per test setup –
Ø Configured REF-Router2 NOT to transmit Router Advertisement on
Network1. But REF-Router2 is able to transmit Router Advertisement on
Networ
the library under
/usr/local/lib/amd64,
the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able
to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point
/usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the
amd64
sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib.
located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able
to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point
/usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64
sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib.
This does make me wonder though, if I am just mi
/amd64, I was able to
work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point
/usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64
sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib.
This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from my
environment, that'
/lib/amd64, I was able
to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point
/usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64
sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib.
This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from
my environment, t
the problem by creating a symbolic link to point
/usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64
sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib.
This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from my
environment, that's causing this. Or i
On 15.12.2011 20:00, Коньков Евгений wrote:
> I am trying to stop process
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/radiusd top
> Stopping radiusd.
> Waiting for PIDS: 27618
>
> top
> 27618 freeradius2 20 -20 333M 295M STOP0 4:42 0.00% radiusd
>
> ps aux
> freeradius 27618 0.0 7.4 341144 302528
_
>>>
>>
>> No idea about virtualbox port, but have you tried deleting the offending
>> file (rm -f /usr/ports/distfiles/v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz)?
>>
>> Amitabh
>>
>
>
After deleting, you don't nee
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Harpreet Singh Chawla <
preet10101...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
> package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
> installation. The package was downloaded automatically and i
I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
/usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
doesn't exi
must be code unrot
On 19 August 2013 16:13, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> For the archives:
>
> I left the problem alone for a few days, with no changes on my side.
>
> Came back Monday. Tried again. Everything worked on the affected
> machines.
>
> ==ml
>
>
For the archives:
I left the problem alone for a few days, with no changes on my side.
Came back Monday. Tried again. Everything worked on the affected
machines.
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:23:41AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>Have you done a "pkg update" first, just in case you needed to pull in a
>pkgng update?
Yep, tried that.
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blath
Have you done a "pkg update" first, just in case you needed to pull in a
pkgng update?
-adrian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions
Matt,
Another data point on this:
Machines converted to pkgng a couple weeks ago can install new
packages just fine despite showing the same error. And it looks like
they download the new repo information:
# pkg install sysrc
Updating repository catalogue
digests.txz 100%
On 16/08/2013 16:02, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> Thanks, Matt.
>
> # pkg -vv | sed -ne '/Repositories/,$p'
> Repositories:
> packagesite:
> url: http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-freebsd:9:x86:32/latest
> key:
> enabled: yes
> mirror_type: SRV
>
> Als
Thanks, Matt.
# pkg -vv | sed -ne '/Repositories/,$p'
Repositories:
packagesite:
url: http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-freebsd:9:x86:32/latest
key:
enabled: yes
mirror_type: SRV
Also:
# pkg -v
1.1.4
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelw
On 16/08/2013 13:43, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure someone has had this before, but I can't find any reference
> to it.
>
> # pkg upgrade
> Updating repository catalogue
> digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00
> packagesite.txz
Hi,
I'm sure someone has had this before, but I can't find any reference
to it.
# pkg upgrade
Updating repository catalogue
digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00
packagesite.txz 100% 5530KB 1.8MB/s 3.2MB/s 00:03
pkg: Invalid manifest
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:14:52 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:01:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
>> Sorry again. Anyway, I have it nailed down now. For anyone who is
>> interested, the missing entry was:
>>
>> options ATA_CAM
>
> Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commente
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:01:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> Sorry again. Anyway, I have it nailed down now. For anyone who is
> interested, the missing entry was:
>
> options ATA_CAM
Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commented out. This is
the "new" method of talking to disk devices, simi
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:47:36 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 479, Issue 8, Message: 10 On Sun, 11
> Aug 2013 09:43:57 + (UTC) Walter Hurry
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walt
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:47:36 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 479, Issue 8, Message: 10 On Sun, 11
> Aug 2013 09:43:57 + (UTC) Walter Hurry
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walt
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 479, Issue 8, Message: 10
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:43:57 + (UTC) Walter Hurry
wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> >> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
>> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
>> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
>>
>> The kernel compiles and runs fine using th
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
>
> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
> try to use my custom kenel
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get this:
Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0p2 faile
just did a ports update, haven't done one for a few months.
portmaster -w www/firefox
craps out with:
In file included from
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/gfx/2d/Blur.cp
p:7:
In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Blur.h:12:
../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.h:179:3
On 2013-07-23 18:07, Teske, Devin wrote:
(opening a can of squiggly worms here)
Well, then you can go fishing
This is a A sidenotnote
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
On Jul 23, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
> wrote:
>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/&k=%2FbkpAUdJWZuiTILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=Mr
On Jul 23, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
wrote:
> ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/
Yep, thanks a lot !
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:36 PM, "Teske, Devin"
> wrote:
>
> > env PACKAGESITE=
> ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-releases/Latest/pkg_add
> -r vim-lite
>
> Thanks for the quick answer but I got the e
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:36 PM, "Teske, Devin" wrote:
> env
> PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-9.0-releases/Latest/
> pkg_add -r vim-lite
Thanks for the quick answer but I got the error:
env
PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-A
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have to install in a probably not latest version BSD machine but when I try
> to
>
> pkg_add -r vim-lite
> Error: Unable to get
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/vim-lite.tbz:
> Fi
Hello all,
I have to install in a probably not latest version BSD machine but when I try
to
pkg_add -r vim-lite
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/vim-lite.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fet
Hi,
USB memstick img file is solution for me.
I try FreeBSD-8.3-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img.
I downloaded this img file and copy to USB, not burn it to USB.
Then attach to İLO such as USB virtual image then sysinstall start, BUT I
selected installation from usb install NOT CD/DVD installation.
th
On 5 Jul 2013, at 00:01, "bw.mail.lists" wrote:
> On 7/4/2013 4:59 PM, Emre Çamalan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to install FreeBSD with an HP ILO 4 advanced, web interface. I
>> tried to install FreeBSD 8.2, FreeBSD 8.3 and FreeBSD 8.4. I tried to use
>> acd0 and cd0 as media. I got the same r
On 7/4/2013 4:59 PM, Emre Çamalan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with an HP ILO 4 advanced, web interface. I tried
to install FreeBSD 8.2, FreeBSD 8.3 and FreeBSD 8.4. I tried to use acd0 and
cd0 as media. I got the same result.
ERROR: I'm trying to add freebsd8.3iso from ILO such a
Hi,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD with an HP ILO 4 advanced, web interface. I tried
to install FreeBSD 8.2, FreeBSD 8.3 and FreeBSD 8.4. I tried to use acd0 and
cd0 as media. I got the same result.
ERROR: I'm trying to add freebsd8.3iso from ILO such as virtual drive not from
cd or dvd.
In Sc
of holding down the ALT key and
> > using a left-mouse-button click.
> >
> > I've googled and found reports on Linux from 2011 of this problem, but
> > none of the solutions I've tried have fixed the problem. I'm using
> > Gnome as my window mana
and
> using a left-mouse-button click.
>
> I've googled and found reports on Linux from 2011 of this problem, but
> none of the solutions I've tried have fixed the problem. I'm using
> Gnome as my window manager, if that has any bearing on the issue.
Maybe this is t
ux from 2011 of this problem, but
none of the solutions I've tried have fixed the problem. I'm using
Gnome as my window manager, if that has any bearing on the issue.
Anybody here found a solution, or have an idea?
Thanks very much for any help
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:06:26 am Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a problem that when running a ping (or any other traffic) over IPoIB
port,
> Traffic fails after some time.
> At destination server DMESG I see that errors:
>
> Jun 11 14:42:11 h-qa-033 kernel: ib
Two slashes here?
That's a copy from the make install, don't ask me why there are two slashes.
>> cp: /usr/local/ETC/asciidoc.conf.sample: No such file or directory
> ^^^
>
> Is this correct? In my opinion, the correct path name
> should be /usr/loc
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:36:35 +0700 (ICT), Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On new 9.1 systems, textproc/asciidoc is being installed as dependency
> to many other ports.
>
> But the make install fails with the error:
>
> installing Vim files in //usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles
Hi,
On new 9.1 systems, textproc/asciidoc is being installed as dependency
to many other ports.
But the make install fails with the error:
installing Vim files in //usr/local/share/vim/vimfiles
cp: /usr/local/ETC/asciidoc.conf.sample: No such file or directory
*** [post-install] Error code 1
It
Hi.
I have a problem that when running a ping (or any other traffic) over IPoIB
port,
Traffic fails after some time.
At destination server DMESG I see that errors:
Jun 11 14:42:11 h-qa-033 kernel: ib1: failed to allocate receive buffer 253
Jun 11 14:42:12 h-qa-033 kernel: ib1: failed to
Installed pkg-devel 1.1.0.b3 and get the following message about incremental
update whenever update is called.
sudo pkg update
Updating repository catalogue
pkg: incremental update is not possible as repo format is inappropriate, trying
full upgrade
packagesite repository catalogue is up-to-date,
Hi,
Hope you have rebooted after enabling the gateway, but you can check this with
" sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding " :)
So far from the server side it looks OK for me, but what are you pinging
actually?
How is done the configuration of the target device?
This sounds like a pure routi
On 2013-05-20 5:01 pm, Pol Hallen wrote:
If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both
boxes?
server1:
re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
1500
options=8209b
ether 70:71:bc:94:c3:6d
inet 192.168.1.250 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
in
> If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both boxes?
server1:
re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8209b
ether 70:71:bc:94:c3:6d
inet 192.168.1.250 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::7271:bcff:fe94:c36d%re0 prefixlen
On 2013-05-20 4:19 pm, Pol Hallen wrote:
Try:
route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250
does not run :-(
Pol
Interesting. I had a similar issue I got around with a similar route
addition, though I was going from a LAN PC through my server that was
running openvpn out to a remotely connected c
> Try:
> route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250
does not run :-(
Pol
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2013-05-20 3:58 pm, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi folks! On my lan I've:
server1
re0 - 192.168.1.250
xl0 - 192.168.2.250
default192.168.1.212 UGS 0 189re0
127.0.0.1 link#8 UH 0 18lo0
192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U
Hi folks! On my lan I've:
server1
re0 - 192.168.1.250
xl0 - 192.168.2.250
default192.168.1.212 UGS 0 189re0
127.0.0.1 link#8 UH 0 18lo0
192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U 0 6145re0
192.168.1.250
Hi all,
I have problem loading a partial dump of one repository into a new
repository. When I try to load a partial dump of the old repository, which
paths also corrected, I've got the "Checksum mismatch" error for a file.
When I try to replace the "Text-content-md5" fiel
Paul Kraus writes:
> That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the
> installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find
> it. Thanks.
>
> Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ?
No need. Looks like sahil@ has already fix
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Paul Kraus writes:
>
>> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
>> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
>> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' g
Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> > "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> > > Den 23.04.2013 13:17, skrev AMS_MDF_operations:
> > > > LS,
> > > > What is going ewrong?
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> > Den 23.04.2013 13:17, skrev AMS_MDF_operations:
> > > LS,
> > > What is going ewrong?
> > >
> > > Problem : Creating user account
>
"Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> Den 23.04.2013 13:17, skrev AMS_MDF_operations:
> > LS,
> > What is going ewrong?
> >
> > Problem : Creating user account
> >
> > -bash-2.05b$ uname -a
> > FreeBSD us-syslog01.dcn.versatel.net 4.9-RELEASE-p10
Den 23.04.2013 13:17, skrev AMS_MDF_operations:
LS,
What is going ewrong?
Problem : Creating user account
-bash-2.05b$ uname -a
FreeBSD us-syslog01.dcn.versatel.net 4.9-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE-p10 #1: Thu Jun 24 10:04:37 GMT 2004
r...@syslog1.versatel.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SYSLOG
LS,
What is going ewrong?
Problem : Creating user account
-bash-2.05b$ uname -a
FreeBSD us-syslog01.dcn.versatel.net 4.9-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD
4.9-RELEASE-p10 #1: Thu Jun 24 10:04:37 GMT 2004
r...@syslog1.versatel.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SYSLOG i386
-bash-2.05b$
-bash-2.05b$ sudo adduser
Paul Kraus writes:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make
> install' fails when trying to install
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:16:20 -0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
> the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine
> with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails
When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine with
9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails when trying to install
the startup script to /usr/etc/rc.d
re trying to use a file as input for their testing, and not
finding it. Tracking down *what* file they want shouldn't be too much
effort. If it turns out to be, you can always update to something recent
enough to be supported, but that's probably unnecessary for this problem.
___
I've got an older FreeBSD 6.1 install that will no longer allow me to build
any software distributions. Any time I try to do a 'configure', the
configure seems to run fine, then I get a "config.status: error: cannot find
input file:". This has happened on several packages from several different
sou
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:16:11 -0500, Teske, Devin
wrote:
Here's what I suggest (the following works for me -- lists all my pools
and shows healthy):
Fantastic! I'd have never considered wrapping the entire thing into
STRING="$STRING$()".
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your assis
`…`
>> to instead:
>> cap=$(…)
>> Oh and of course, the HTML should go away since you're making a command-line
>> tool and not a BB/Hobbit/Xymon module.
>
> I actually will be using this with Xymon at work. I did fix the == and style
> nit when I went
d not a BB/Hobbit/Xymon module.
I actually will be using this with Xymon at work. I did fix the == and
style nit when I went over this script I'm still having a problem. When I
started debugging this last night $STRING led me to believe the pipe into
read wasn't working right. At the
t set of variables for the last line
> after the loop has run (and presumably already processed the last line). This
> is what I am saying anyone will rarely ever want. In other words, once the
> loop (potentially running in a sub-shell) has completed, you likely don't
> care a
l rarely ever want. In other words, once the loop
(potentially running in a sub-shell) has completed, you likely don't care about
the variable contents and are willing to throw them away anyhow.
>>> — in particular Bash and ksh differ here. The standardidiom for overcoming
>&
eatly between
implementations — in particular Bash and ksh differ here. The standard
idiom for overcoming this problem is to use a here document:
IFS= read var << EOF
$(foo)
EOF
I was having problems with the variables magically becoming empty,
remembered I had Rich's site bookmarke
On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas
> on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh.
/me takes the challenge (and shame on some of the current responses; this is
trivial in sh and th
On 4/4/2013 3:32 μμ, Mark Felder wrote:
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD w
fail on an unwritable
filesystem.
...By which I mean you can't create new files because your disk is
completely full or you're booting from a ramdisk that's messed up, etc.
__
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:47:09 -0500, Quartz wrote:
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define "funky shell". Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
Any shells not in the Fr
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define "funky shell". Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
or using any temporary files.
Do you mean "manually created temp files"? bec
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to have
this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells o
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:53:11AM -0500, Antonio Olivares typed:
> Dear Sir,
>
> >
> > As bapt@ hints: try rebuilding binutils without NLS.
> >
> > --
> > --
>
> I have binutils installed without NLS. I ran make deinstall reinstall
> inside /usr/ports/devel/binutils/ and it deinstalls and it fa
t found
> pkg: (virtualbox-ose-4.2.6) /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSVC - shared
> library VBoxXPCOM.so not found
> pkg: (virtualbox-ose-4.2.6) /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOMIPCD -
> shared library VBoxXPCOM.so not found
> pkg: (virtualbox-ose-4.2.6) /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBox
On 26/03/2013 19:18, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:13:04 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> I hope Matthew Seaman sees this:
>>
>> All the files are of course present and correct in /usr/local/lib/
>> virtualbox
>
>
>
> Should have mentioned: This is pkg-1.0.9_2
I see it. There ha
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:13:04 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> I hope Matthew Seaman sees this:
>
> All the files are of course present and correct in /usr/local/lib/
> virtualbox
Should have mentioned: This is pkg-1.0.9_2
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
I hope Matthew Seaman sees this:
All the files are of course present and correct in /usr/local/lib/
virtualbox
# pkg check -Ba
pkg: (virtualbox-ose-4.2.6) /usr/local/bin/VBoxAutostart - shared library
VBoxRT.so not found
pkg: (virtualbox-ose-4.2.6) /usr/local/bin/VBoxAutostart - shared library
ally in
trouble.
I am not using pkgng just ports. On three machines I am successfull,
two 9.1-RELEASE-p1 and one 8.3-RELEASE, but this 9.1-RELEASE box I
could not build some ports, I tried deinstall/reinstall options, and
now I guess I am in a major problem, unless gettext starts to build
soon
1 - 100 of 10751 matches
Mail list logo
