On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, JC wrote:
Under Section: 29.6.7.2. DHCP Server Installation
There is a error where the file name reads "/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf.sample".
"dhcpd.conf.sample" should read "dhcpd.conf.example".
Fixed! In the future, reporting this type of problem with a PR is the
best w
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Fernando
Apesteguía
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 5:16 AM
To: JC
Cc: User Questions
Subject: Re: Automatic Network Configuration (DHCP)
El 02/09/2013 23:02, &qu
El 02/09/2013 23:02, "JC" escribió:
>
> Under Section: 29.6.7.2. DHCP Server Installation
>
>
> There is a error where the file name reads
"/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf.sample".
>
> "dhcpd.conf.sample" should read "dhcpd.conf.example".
Could you please file a PR?
> _
Under Section: 29.6.7.2. DHCP Server Installation
There is a error where the file name reads "/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf.sample".
"dhcpd.conf.sample" should read "dhcpd.conf.example".
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
Romain Garbage wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network
depending on its "topology" (don't know if it's the good word) : I
would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged
in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired
int
Hello,
I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network
depending on its "topology" (don't know if it's the good word) : I
would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged
in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired
interface, if no bring up t
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>
> send output of:
> # ifconfig -v wi0
>
Hi. Thanks for trying to help. I fixed the problem myself (and
demonstrated I couldn't do a prudent thinking). The mistake is trying to
use shared key in an open-systems wireless network. I managed to get it
right by having
authomod
On 10/31/08, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 10/30/08, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>>>
Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encr
Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 10/30/08, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>>>
Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encrypt
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 10/30/08, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>>
>>> Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
>>> card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encryption on
>>> FreeBSD 6.1.
>>>
>>> # ifconfig wi0 in
On 10/30/08, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>> Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
>> card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encryption on
>> FreeBSD 6.1.
>>
>> # ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.1.90 ssid ZWW wepmode on wepkey
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
> card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encryption on
> FreeBSD 6.1.
>
> # ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.1.90 ssid ZWW wepmode on wepkey 0xea82552825
> ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Invalid argument
>
>
Hello. I am trying to get an AboveCable (model: ACPC 2000-01) wireless
card connected to my home network with 40-bit Hex WEP Encryption on
FreeBSD 6.1.
# ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.1.90 ssid ZWW wepmode on wepkey 0xea82552825
ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Invalid argument
Did I made anything wrong or mis
Hello,
Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> Johannes-Maria Kaltenbach wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > many thanks for your help.
> >
> > The problem was already solved with the first answer I read
> > by Steve Bertrand,
>
> Derek does have an important point.
>
> If you ever need to add any other workstations to t
Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Steve Bertrand wrote:
If you ever need to add any other workstations to the network, you
will want to ensure that the IP you added to FreeBSD manually does not
fall within the DHCP scope of the gateway.
For instance, if you plug a Windows PC into the ga
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Steve Bertrand wrote:
If you ever need to add any other workstations to the network, you will want
to ensure that the IP you added to FreeBSD manually does not fall within the
DHCP scope of the gateway.
For instance, if you plug a Windows PC into the gateway, it will by def
Johannes-Maria Kaltenbach wrote:
Hello,
many thanks for your help.
The problem was already solved with the first answer I read
by Steve Bertrand,
Derek does have an important point.
If you ever need to add any other workstations to the network, you will
want to ensure that the IP you added
Hello,
many thanks for your help.
The problem was already solved with the first answer I read
by Steve Bertrand,
...
> You essentially gave yourself an address outside of the gateways LAN
> address scope, and then proceeded to route all unknown traffic to yourself.
>
> You probably want:
>
> # if
At 04:08 AM 4/8/2008, Johannes-Maria Kaltenbach wrote:
Hello,
at the moment I'm using internet an emails via a 56k modem and ppp.
I want to change to DSL -- but I'm not able to do it without help.
I've bought a router/gateway from my provider (Telekom/T-Online)
which is called "Speedport W 502
I've bought a router/gateway from my provider (Telekom/T-Online)
which is called "Speedport W 502V Typ A" an has the ip address
192.168.2.1; it is connectet to an ethernet card (rl0).
192.168.2.1/24 is in a different network than 192.168.10.1/24. Your
gateway and your workstation will not be ab
Hello,
at the moment I'm using internet an emails via a 56k modem and ppp.
I want to change to DSL -- but I'm not able to do it without help.
I've bought a router/gateway from my provider (Telekom/T-Online)
which is called "Speedport W 502V Typ A" an has the ip address
192.168.2.1; it is connect
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[ in dhclient.conf ]
interface "ath0" {
prepend domain-name-servers 196.168.1.1;
}
Neat. I used another workaround (don't remember exactly what) back then,
but this sure looks tidier.
Something to remember...
Alphons
--
VISTA - Virus
On 2008-01-30 22:07, Alphons Fonz van Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> [/etc/resolv.conf]
>
>> I think DHCP makes it if you do dynamic
>
> It did so in 6.1-RELEASE and it's not likely that this has changed.
> In fact, I had to explicitly config DHCP to not overwrite m
no mine is not dynamic and I have the resolv.conf file set-up. It works fine
now.
I had some issues with FTP ing and some address conflict message for
ssh/tcp. I sysinstalled and disabled SSH there, I guess probably cos inetd
takes care of it and ftp also works fine now, i guess after etc/rc.conf
Jerry McAllister wrote:
[/etc/resolv.conf]
I think DHCP makes it if you do dynamic
It did so in 6.1-RELEASE and it's not likely that this has changed.
In fact, I had to explicitly config DHCP to not overwrite my resolv.conf
(because I wanted my own DNS server to be queried before the ISP's).
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:09:00PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> strangely my /etc has no resolv.conf file at all !
It will only have one if you make one by setting up networking.
sysinstall makes one if you set up a static IP. I think DHCP makes
it if you do dynamic, but I don't have mu
i got my ISP's IP address from some webpage. i am at home
running DSL here is what my file looks like
kv_bsd#
kv_bsd# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 192.168.0.1
kv_bsd#
i just had to create that file
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
strangely my /etc has no resolv.c
strangely my /etc has no resolv.conf file at all !
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:01:18PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
>
> > Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
> > I see so when i
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:35:03PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route & devd with their
> pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account the
> new chages I've done & restarts the network.
You will have to do a
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57:59PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
> and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
> the rc.conf script.
I should mention that the line changes if you are
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:01:18PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
> I see so when i use the netstat command
Yes. You need a default router specified because that is the
address that becomes your gateway to the rest of
oh yes, I did use the right IP, netmask and interface to be configured.
Now thankfully the LAN pings work, the thing I have to find out now is how
to make ftp work which still keeps saying that hostname or servname not
known
Thanks a lot
Bhuvana
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57:59PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
> and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
> the rc.conf script.
I am not quite sure what you are asking here, but
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
ok the local LAN ping works now
At the risk of being obvious: please be so smart as to write down
the settings (and try to understand exactly why they are the way they
are) so you don't have to reinvent the wheel next time around.
Alphons
--
VISTA - Viruses Intru
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:35:03 +0100, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route & devd with
their
pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account
the
new chages I've done & restarts the network.
Try
/
Written by Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar on 01/30/08 13:02>>
> ok the local LAN ping works now
>
FYI, the handbook is very helpful.
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
ok the local LAN ping works now
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:52 PM, आशीष Ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> | with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it
> work
> | and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn
,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
| with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
| and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
| the rc.conf script.
BtW, what is your network prefix and subnet mask ? Also menti
An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route & devd with their
pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account the
new chages I've done & restarts the network.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is it a cause o
Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
I see so when i use the netstat command
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it
> work and ping my LAN success
with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
the rc.conf script.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0500, Bhuv
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> ifconfig em0 up also doesnt help ping my LAN.
>
> the ifconfig -a output now reads the IP I just added, as well as the
> net-mask & the 100 Mbps active linnk.
>
> quick question :
>
> I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.sh
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.should this be done everytime I restart
my application, is it some kind of a temporary address assignment, bcos
whatever I assigned was not visible today when I re-booted and I had to do
it again, probably I should set this in the
ifconfig em0 up also doesnt help ping my LAN.
the ifconfig -a output now reads the IP I just added, as well as the
net-mask & the 100 Mbps active linnk.
quick question :
I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.should this be done everytime I restart
my application, is it some kind of a temporary add
,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
| I did have an IP address assigned to my ethernet interface( using the
| ifconfig command) but I'm unable to ping anybody in my LAN.
In the 'ifconfig -a' output you posted earlier, the 'em0' (your desired
interface) interface neither h
I did have an IP address assigned to my ethernet interface( using the
ifconfig command) but I'm unable to ping anybody in my LAN.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:38 AM, आशीष Ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ,--[ On Tuesday 29 Jan 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> | On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari
,--[ On Tuesday 29 Jan 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
| On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
| Hmmm. There seems to be something very 'odd' about your interfaces.
|
| * There is no `lo0' loopback interface, which commonly uses the
| 127.0.0.1
> You need to set the default gateway in /etc/rc.conf. Without a
> default gateway, you will need to add a default route with the
> route command.
>
> Without a route your machine will only be able to ping itself.
Unless something has changed dramatically -- and fairly recently --
a machine that
ok down works but delete dosent
I guess the 1st one is for disabling the plip interface and the second for
completely removing it , or let me know if I'm getting this wrong here.
ifconfig: 10ctl(SIOCDIFADDR) : cant assign requested address
is this bcos of the down I did before this command ?
once
On 2008-01-28 22:33, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos,
>
> Thanks a lot for the excellent reply, yes I do have some questions about
> this but before that:
>
> the unplumb operation for pilp0 doesnt work.
>
> ifconfig: SIOCIFDESTROY: Invalid argument
>
> is the message
Giorgos,
Thanks a lot for the excellent reply, yes I do have some questions about
this but before that:
the unplumb operation for pilp0 doesnt work.
ifconfig: SIOCIFDESTROY: Invalid argument
is the message I get for this.
Sincerely,
Bhuvana
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok here u go, the exact output of the the commands:
Excellent! Thank you :-)
> #ifconfig -a
>
> em0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> options=b
> ether :0d:56:f0:f1:ba
> media:Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
> status: active
>
> pli
the netstat reads:
#netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags REfs Use Netif Expire
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH041 lo0
Internet 6
Destination Gateway Flags Netif
Expire
::1::1 UH
ok here u go, the exact output of the the commands:
#ifconfig -a
em0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
options=b
ether :0d:56:f0:f1:ba
media:Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: active
plip0:flags=108810 mtu 1500
lo0:flags=8049 MTU 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80
ifconfig -a
em0: flags ...lot of data .
status: active
( I'm guessing this is the ethernet interface)
lo0: similar stuff as em0
and my var/log/messages has a lot of data in it, I dont know if I'm
identifying a boot message accurately but there is a line that specifies t
On 2008-01-28 18:18, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Christopher Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Send the list the output of the following commands:
> > # ifconfig -a
> > # netstat -rn
> >
> > With that info, we can probably help you out
At 05:38 PM 1/28/2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
I'm guessing it does detect the interface, network-device & all that, bcos
my ifconfig says the ethernet status is active. But still I'm unable to do
any kind of networking at all, even pings from other PCs to this one remain
unreachable. I'm wo
I'm guessing it does detect the interface, network-device & all that, bcos
my ifconfig says the ethernet status is active. But still I'm unable to do
any kind of networking at all, even pings from other PCs to this one remain
unreachable. I'm wondering if I should configure something else in the
sy
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:29:49PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
> I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
> suggestions are welcome.
>
> I think my system is not connected to the
I configured the ethernet interface in the post-install config with my IP
and net-mask, though I didnt know the gateway then. It gave me a warning
that I might not be able to access remote machines, but that still dosent
explain why it wont even ping the next node in my LAN. The rc.conf file does
h
ifconfig -a
em0: flags ...lot of data .
status: active
( I'm guessing this is the ethernet interface)
netstat -rn
routing tables:
Internet :
127.0.0.1 ..followed by some IPs, flags(UH), etc ..
Internet6
expire followed by some hex-values and flags
would this do or
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
RTFM
begin with
/usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/handbook.txt (or html what
you prefer)
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:29:49PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
> I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
> I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
> suggestions are welcome.
>
> I think my system is not connected to the internet o
were not part of the install, then something is not
right, and someone else on this board might help you. My guess (I'm a
newbie too) is that perhaps the network device was not recognized by FreeBSD
5.5?
It's always possible to do network configuration post-install. I'd find
som
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or any external network,
ping dosent work ( no
Hi,
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or any external network,
ping dosent work ( nor ftp or dig)
When I try to do
> > Hello,
> >
> > I run a FreeBSD Jailer and I want to have multiple jails in 2
> > seperate networks. The server has 2 network interfaces and each of
> > them are connected in a different network. Say vlan1 and vlan2.
> >
> > My problem is that all the network traffic is going through the
> >
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 08:12:41 am Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Félix Langelier wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I run a FreeBSD Jailer and I want to have multiple jails in 2 seperate
> > networks. The server has 2 network interfaces and each of them are
> > connected in a different network. Say vla
Félix Langelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run a FreeBSD Jailer and I want to have multiple jails in 2 seperate
> networks. The server has 2 network interfaces and each of them are connected
> in a different network. Say vlan1 and vlan2.
>
> My problem is that all the network traffic is going throug
Hello,
I run a FreeBSD Jailer and I want to have multiple jails in 2 seperate
networks. The server has 2 network interfaces and each of them are connected in
a different network. Say vlan1 and vlan2.
My problem is that all the network traffic is going through the first interface
(vlan1). What
> >> - you are NOT trying to get the second PC on the Internet
> >
> > No, I'm not. The agreement with my ISP doesn't allow to connect more
> > than one computer to the WAN.
>
> LOL ;) I won't condone going against their rules, but that is what NAT
> is for...
>
> > Part of my network's configurati
>> - you are NOT trying to get the second PC on the Internet
>>
> No, I'm not. The agreement with my ISP doesn't allow to connect more
> than one computer to the WAN.
LOL ;) I won't condone going against their rules, but that is what NAT
is for...
> Part of my network's configuration is not in /
net
No, I'm not. The agreement with my ISP doesn't allow to connect more than one
computer to the WAN.
>
> Now, I don't want to just give you my first advice, as I don't fully
> understand your methods here, so please post the relevant portions of
> /etc/rc.conf
some things here, correct me if I'm wrong:
- both PC's are plugged into a switch/hub
- your routers LAN IP address is 10.50.93.1
- you are NOT trying to get the second PC on the Internet
Now, I don't want to just give you my first advice, as I d
> # ifconfig
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 fe80::20a:cdff:fe01:9350%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 10.50.93.21 netmask 0xff80 broadcast 10.50.93.127
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.2
ether 00:0a:cd:01:93:50
me
> I have problems with network configuration of two computers
> with FreeBSD. One has 5.4 and the second has 6.0. Both have
> Pentium III compatible processors.
> They are both connected to an Ethernet switch.
> Computer with 5.4 has access to WAN, but there isn't any
I have problems with network configuration of two computers with FreeBSD. One
has 5.4 and the second has 6.0. Both have Pentium III compatible processors.
They are both connected to an Ethernet switch.
Computer with 5.4 has access to WAN, but there isn't any access to computer
with 6.0
;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Network configuration
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you all for the help and time. I finally got it all
> working with bits
> from most emails.
>
> I'll include my configuration here for
100 queue 30 ip from any to any in recv xl1
add 31000 queue 31 icmp from any to any out xmit xl1
add 31100 queue 31 ip from any to any out xmit xl1
add 5 pass all from any to any
I hope this helps someone in the future :)
--
Regards,
Terrence Koeman
MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com
atd_interface="rl0" # the id of your public NIC card
natd_flags="-m"
biggreenwall#
RFC1918
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Kinkade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Terrence Koeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 19:49
> To: Terrence Koeman
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network configuration
>
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:10:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Lowell Gilbert
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network configuration
>
>
> "Terrence Koeman
"Terrence Koeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have been busy setting up a network the last 3 days, but I cannot get it
> working.
>
> Basically I have no clue what has to be setup etc. and if I need bridging or
> not.
>
> The situation is as follows:
>
> ---
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Terrence Koeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been busy setting up a network the last 3 days, but I cannot get it
> working.
>
> Basically I have no clue what has to be setup etc. and if I need bridging or
> not.
>
> The situation is as follows:
>
>
: Thursday, July 08, 2004 17:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Network configuration
>
> Post the full content of your rc.conf file and your ipfw rule set.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Terrenc
Hi,
I have been busy setting up a network the last 3 days, but I cannot get it
working.
Basically I have no clue what has to be setup etc. and if I need bridging or
not.
The situation is as follows:
--
| SDSL Modem |
| Bri
>> Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't
>> know what
>> I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
>> etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
>>
>> I'm linux u
Miguel Cardenas wrote:
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *n
On 8 Jul 2004 at 1:52, Miguel Cardenas wrote:
> Hello
>
> Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
> I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
When you got to the HD partitioning in the beginning of
Miguel Cardenas wrote:
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *n
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but do
91 matches
Mail list logo
