Thank you all for your input.
Went to the office very dark in my mind.
I found a cd with amd64 8.0-R and I could
copy libc.so.7
I Thank you ALLnow i'm crying
so I leave you now.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On 22/02/2013 4:44 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
You missed the earlier suggestion - at the single user prompt for a
shell don't just hit enter - type in /rescue/sh
This suggestion was gold for me, but in a different way. I have for
years lamented the passing of static binaries in /bin and /sbin.
I
On 22/02/2013 10:07, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Yes that is an idea. Since Damien was kind to host the file I downloaded
it and will try later today (friday)
The problem is I can't burn or otherwise get in to the machine.
libc.so.7: invalid file format
You missed the earlier suggestion - at the s
2013-02-21 22:10, Joshua Isom skrev:
On 2/21/2013 11:22 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in
to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /b
On 2/21/2013 11:22 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in
to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
libexec* libc.so.7: invalid fi
;
> Perhaps someone can host a file on a machine that can be reached via
> /rescue/rcp for you.
> --
> Devin
>
>
>
> From: Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM
> To: Teske, Devin
> C
--
Devin
From: Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM
To: Teske, Devin
Cc: Fleuriot Damien; questions FreeBSD
Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
> Is it the base machine that won'
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:22:47 +0100
Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
> > Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
>
> That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in
> to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
>
>
> l
On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
>> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
>
> That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in to a
> single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
>
>
> libexec
2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev:
Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ...
That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in
to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh
libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format
I do not want to reinstall, have
Devin
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org]
on behalf of Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Fleuriot Damien
Cc: questions FreeBSD
Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc
2013
2013-02-21 15:43, Fleuriot Damien skrev:
On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
It's me again.
I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from
On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> It's me again.
>
> I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
>
> Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
> so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there.
>
> I did remove th
Hello list!
It's me again.
I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on.
Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7
so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there.
I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no.
Copy it to the jail, someon
y.
Also, for the person that contacted us.not sure who you spoke to as
getting a SPAM filter is the LAST response we would give. This was
particularly for the situation where we were running a test system.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Regards,
--
View this
2010-08-22 00:48, Bruce Cran skrev:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:57 +0200
Svein Skogen wrote:
Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
I think anyone who posts to freebsd-questions is probably getting them.
I haven't seen them, and haven't looked for them.
I contacte
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:48:50PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:57 +0200
> Svein Skogen wrote:
>
> > Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
>
> I think anyone who posts to freebsd-questions is probably getting them.
> I contacted parklogic and go
ly have no intention of fixing their mess,
expecting everyone else to run anti-spam products to sort out THEIR problem.
I still think the correct response for this is to make sure the
freebsd.org servers won't be reaching their net (that will stop the
forged messages being triggered by incoming m
On 08/21/2010 18:48, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:57 +0200
> Svein Skogen wrote:
>
>> Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
>
> I think anyone who posts to freebsd-questions is probably getting them.
> I contacted parklogic and got a response telling m
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:57 +0200
Svein Skogen wrote:
> Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
I think anyone who posts to freebsd-questions is probably getting them.
I contacted parklogic and got a response telling me I could use an
anti-spam product to avoid getting
Anybody else seem to get these header-falsified messages lately:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: svein-listm...@stillbilde.net
Delivered-To: svein-listm...@stillbilde.net
Received: from dusk.parklogic.com (allmail.0b2.net [64.38.11.26])
by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with
On 1/9/2010 11:41 AM, PJ wrote:
> On 1/9/2010 4:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Upgraded to 8.0 without problem.
>>> Reinstalling ports was tedious... but NP for most part.
>>> Sommehow the installation of apache22 stumbled over some configuration
>>> issues, I think
On 1/9/2010 4:34 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Upgraded to 8.0 without problem.
>> Reinstalling ports was tedious... but NP for most part.
>> Sommehow the installation of apache22 stumbled over some configuration
>> issues, I think
>> I found that apache was running ok, except...
>>
Thanks for the response, Matthew.
Now that I've had somewhat of a night's sleep thinking about the
problem. This might help clear things for future generations. :-)
Here's some background: Before upgrading from 7.2 RELEASE to 8.0 RELEASE
, I had run portsnap on 7.2 but did not update the ports.
I
PJ wrote:
Upgraded to 8.0 without problem.
Reinstalling ports was tedious... but NP for most part.
Sommehow the installation of apache22 stumbled over some configuration
issues, I think
I found that apache was running ok, except...
php5 module was not correctly installed...
mod_php5 isn't b
PJ wrote:
> Thought I'd better get more specific:
> I rebooted, apache is running.
> I deleted the apache2 directories --
> but lo and behold, it is the php5 port that is stubborn and absolutely
> insists on creating these directories.
> What in Hades is going on?
[snip]
Don't know if this pertai
Thought I'd better get more specific:
I rebooted, apache is running.
I deleted the apache2 directories --
but lo and behold, it is the php5 port that is stubborn and absolutely
insists on creating these directories.
What in Hades is going on?
===> Installing for php5-5.2.12
===> php5-5.2.12 dep
Upgraded to 8.0 without problem.
Reinstalling ports was tedious... but NP for most part.
Sommehow the installation of apache22 stumbled over some configuration
issues, I think
I found that apache was running ok, except...
php5 module was not correctly installed...
So, I'm trying to reinstall ap
iver is much faster than
'radeonhd' on this fast chipset!
Well, xf86-video-radeonhd is at revision 1.2.5 and this one is, when
believing what the Wiki says, under development and advisory of AMD
itself. Why is it so bumpy and unwilling to recognize an RV770LE
chipset? Does anyone has a hint o
Sorry about the delay in my response. I got tied up in lots of unrelated
matters for several days.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:55:43 +0100 Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Now that I've upgraded to X.org 7.3, I'm wishing that I hadn't done it.
>> ...
>>
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:09:54 +0100 Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The only problem I'm having since 7.3 btw (I forgot about that, but just
remembered) is everytime I start nethack-qt (either local or remote) X
restarts, kicking me out of my session.
D
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:09:54 +0100 Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Mark Ovens wrote:
>>
>> The other thing I've noticed is, on my box at least, that the problem
>> always starts when I move the mouse (not every time of course) so could
>> it be Xorg 7.3 not playing nicely with the
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:01:28 + Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Peter Boosten wrote:
>> Ken Gunderson wrote:
>>> [snip]
Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
Xorg.
Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the iss
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:01:28 +
Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Boosten wrote:
> > Ken Gunderson wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>> Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
> >>> Xorg.
> >>>
> >>> Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the
Scott Bennett wrote:
Now that I've upgraded to X.org 7.3, I'm wishing that I hadn't done it.
...
I'm still discovering more and more broken stuff in 7.3 each day. It's
only partially usable. ...
Did you check the integrity of your libraries? Are you maybe using portupgrade
that keep
Mark Ovens wrote:
The other thing I've noticed is, on my box at least, that the problem
always starts when I move the mouse (not every time of course) so could
it be Xorg 7.3 not playing nicely with the mouse driver - or the USB
driver since my mouse is a USB one? Which may explain why some p
Peter Boosten wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
[snip]
Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
Xorg.
Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the issues
you describe anyway.
Peter
So how would you explain that I am seeing same type of behaviors in
Ken Gunderson wrote:
[snip]
Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
Xorg.
Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the issues
you describe anyway.
Peter
So how would you explain that I am seeing same type of behaviors in
straight "startx" wit
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:19:19 +0100
Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
Xorg.
Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the issues you
describe anyway.
indeed - i've jumped
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:19:19 +0100
Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
> Xorg.
>
> Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the issues you
> describe anyway.
indeed - i've jumped onto 7.3 as soon as
[snip]
>Looks like you're having a problem with your window manager, instead of
>Xorg.
>
>Mine (with enlightenment-devel) works like charm. None of the issues
>you describe anyway.
>
>Peter
So how would you explain that I am seeing same type of behaviors in
straight "startx" with default twm, i.e
h(1) inside an xterm.
I'm still discovering more and more broken stuff in 7.3 each day. It's
only partially usable. How did this release ever make it out the door? What
a mess. I suppose I can restore from the backups to get back to 6.9, though,
but what a drag. All that mucking aro
well i just reinstalled my packages from scratch (too much mess till
today), with Xorg 7.3, now opera only not firefox, xterm, gimp etc..
all works fine
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Scott Bennett wrote:
Now that I've upgraded to X.org 7.3, I'm wishing that I hadn't done it.
Fi
'm still discovering more and more broken stuff in 7.3 each day. It's
only partially usable. How did this release ever make it out the door? What
a mess. I suppose I can restore from the backups to get back to 6.9, though,
but what a drag. All that mucking around to get through the upgr
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Roy Plant wrote:
[snip]
2) How do I keep the rest of my ports up to date without
updating PHP 5?
Perhaps you could edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf to include
HOLD_PKGS = [
'php-*'
]
This should prevent portupgrade from upgrading anything php. Not sure I
got t
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Roy Plant wrote:
1) How do I downgrade to PHP 5.1?
Install and run /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portdowngrade.
2) How do I keep the rest of my ports up to date without updating PHP 5?
You'll really only need to worry about things that depend on PHP, so it
may not be that bad
In response to Roy Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The last time I dabbled with Unix was 20 years ago - so I'm old and more than
> a little rusty. A while ago I decided FreeBSD 5.4 + Apache2 + PHP 5 +
> PostgreSQL + MySQL was a decent way to set up a development server. So I put
> all this on a dua
e.com/Advice-needed---how-did-I-get-into-this-mess--tf3239449.html#a9004239
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
On 1/18/07, Dak Ghatikachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did I screw up my firefox big time, I see flash player
plugins files everywhere.
It's actually a cutting-edge technology called chaotic
symlinking :-) Don't bother your eyes with the internals,
/usr/local/lib/npapi is supposed to look sc
layer.xpt
-r--r--r-- 1 oracle wheel 856 Oct 27 16:42
/usr/home/oracle/.mozilla/firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt
#
what a mess
Is it best to delete/unistall everything fire firefox using pkg_delete and
start clean slate ? But then I went and tampered into /us
The flash plugin works great with linux-firefox; but how do you get the
java plugin to work with it?
I don't know if there is a way to get a FreeBSD version of the Java
plugin to work. If you have a Linux version of it sitting around:
cd /usr/local/lib/linux-firefox/plugins
ln -s
/usr/local/
- Original Message
From: Michael M. Press <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dak Ghatikachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; FreeBSD WickerBill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:21:02 AM
Subject: Re: Firefox mess in Freebsd 6.1
&g
I need to try the Warren's method to see if that is going to help me,
first of all I need to read man portupgrade to perform the upgrade from 6.1to
6.2 , as i am new into this freebsd world.
The really easy way out is to install the linux-firefox port. If you
do this, flash
should "just work".
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote:
On 1/16/07, FreeBSD WickerBill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
or, look in /usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins/ and make sure the plugin
or a symlink exists.
6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1
I have these files in
$ pwd
/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins
$ ls -lrt
total
6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1
I have these files in
$ pwd
/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins
$ ls -lrt
total 2132
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2158864 Oct 27 16:42 libflashplayer.so
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 856 Oct 27 16:42 flashplayer.xpt
drwxr-xr-x 2 500 100512 Dec 4 19:09 install_flash
On 1/16/07, Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote:
> My Firefox is crashing all the time since I setup the flash plugins,
>
> I first plugged in the mplayer and after which it was working well.
>
> Because several other news websites were expecting
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote:
My Firefox is crashing all the time since I setup the flash plugins,
I first plugged in the mplayer and after which it was working well.
Because several other news websites were expecting flash or shockwave
plugins
I went ahead and did everything
Hi Freebsd
My Firefox is crashing all the time since I setup the flash plugins,
I first plugged in the mplayer and after which it was working well.
Because several other news websites were expecting flash or shockwave
plugins
I went ahead and did everything per the instructions in
http://ww
At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Daniel Bye composed:
> If you have /rescue on your system, you have a static vi already. Not
> vim, admittedly, but in a fix I would think you could muddle through with
> it.
>
Bingo Dan!
#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /rescue]-> ldd
Hunter Fuller wrote:
On 22 May 2006, at 1:39 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I hereby admit to being a vi wimp. I did memorize 'q:!',
for obvious reasons; and, this isn't about an editor war,
either.
Woops! Are you sure about that last statement? :P
I think you meant :q!
:D
Maybe if I'd been us
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:16:03AM -0700, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed:
>
> > Yup. It is in /usr/bin
> > I guess, I am so used to putting a copy of vi in /bin shortly after
> > installing a new system that I assume it is always there.
> >
well, it looks like my sh has some dependancies too, so I wouldn't
worry about it really.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/lang/php5]# ldd `which sh`
/bin/sh:
libedit.so.5 => /lib/libedit.so.5 (0x2808c000)
libncurses.so.6 => /lib/libncurses.so.6 (0x280a)
libc.so.6 => /lib/lib
At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed:
> >
> > At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed:
> >
> > > Yup. It is in /usr/bin
> > > I guess, I am so used to putting a copy of vi in /bin shortly after
> > > installing a new system that I assume it is always
On 22 May 2006, at 1:39 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I hereby admit to being a vi wimp. I did memorize 'q:!',
for obvious reasons; and, this isn't about an editor war,
either.
Woops! Are you sure about that last statement? :P
I think you meant :q!
Personally, I moved a binary of e3 (ports/edi
>
> At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed:
>
> > Yup. It is in /usr/bin
> > I guess, I am so used to putting a copy of vi in /bin shortly after
> > installing a new system that I assume it is always there.
> >
>
> Can we actually 'de-install' then 're-install' vi(m) from
At Mon, 22 May 2006 it looks like Jerry McAllister composed:
> Yup. It is in /usr/bin
> I guess, I am so used to putting a copy of vi in /bin shortly after
> installing a new system that I assume it is always there.
>
Can we actually 'de-install' then 're-install' vi(m) from PORTS with
it stat
>
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> if i enter single user mode it dasen't seem to recognize many commands:
> >> starrtx, ee, pico, emacs etc so i cannot change my /etc/fstab in case this
> >> is the problem.
> >
> > Yes. Generally none of those extra things are availiable in si
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:51:19AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > I fear that this time a messed up big time. I have two hard drives one
> > with Windows XP (40G) and another with FreeBSD 6.1 (10G). Eveything was
> > ok until I decided i wanted to mount my windows drive to FreBSD (i run KD
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
if i enter single user mode it dasen't seem to recognize many commands:
starrtx, ee, pico, emacs etc so i cannot change my /etc/fstab in case this
is the problem.
Yes. Generally none of those extra things are availiable in single user.
Single user is minimal
Hi,
First of all, to make it easier to read and especially to respond to
your posts, please break your lines at about 72 characters length.
You can either set your Email editor to do that or just hit ENTER
at about that length of each line (which is what I do).
> Hi
> I fear that this time a me
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 19:51 +1000, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
> none none wrote:
> > Hi
> > I fear that this time a messed up big time. I have two hard drives one
> > with Windows XP (40G) and another with FreeBSD 6.1 (10G). Eveything was ok
> > until I decided i wanted to mount my windows drive
On Mon, May 22, 2006 10:02, none none wrote:
> Hi
> I fear that this time a messed up big time. I have two hard drives one
> with Windows XP (40G) and another with FreeBSD 6.1 (10G). Eveything was
> ok until I decided i wanted to mount my windows drive to FreBSD (i run
> KDE as GUI). I followed
none none wrote:
> Hi
> I fear that this time a messed up big time. I have two hard drives one with
> Windows XP (40G) and another with FreeBSD 6.1 (10G). Eveything was ok until
> I decided i wanted to mount my windows drive to FreBSD (i run KDE as GUI). I
> followed the instruction from OnLa
> if i enter single user mode it dasen't seem to recognize many
> commands: starrtx, ee, pico, emacs etc so i cannot change my
> /etc/fstab in case this is the problem.
At that stage, you should still be able to mount /usr (provided that
you did notmove /usron your windows disk...)
So mount
Hi
I fear that this time a messed up big time. I have two hard drives one with
Windows XP (40G) and another with FreeBSD 6.1 (10G). Eveything was ok until I
decided i wanted to mount my windows drive to FreBSD (i run KDE as GUI). I
followed the instruction from OnLamp.com and since i wanted t
On Monday 14 November 2005 12:39 pm, Hans Nieser wrote:
> Hans Nieser wrote:
> .> Hi list,
>
>
> [... huge complaint about stale dependencies ...]
>
> My apologies, in my frustration I sent this out without properly
> investigating, seems all I had to do was install the ports mentioned
> in the pkg
Hans Nieser wrote:
.> Hi list,
[... huge complaint about stale dependencies ...]
My apologies, in my frustration I sent this out without properly
investigating, seems all I had to do was install the ports mentioned in
the pkgdb output about the stale dependencies and run pkgdb -F again to
corrupted I ran "pkgdb -F",
which resulted in the following mess:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/www# pkgdb -F
---> Checking the package registry database
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 350 packages
f
Hello!
I wrote about this months ago, and now I had some free
time to look into the problem - only to find that it's
too complicated for me to fix it on my own.
The problem is my machine is configured via DHCP, but
I need to use ppp from time to time. PPP adjusts
resolv.conf and some routes for int
Ladies & Gents;
I've got an issue that has me stumped. I'm working with an old 1U
server (Tyan Thunder LE [s2510] and ServerWorks III), and in order to
keep the machine from resetting on me, we entered a line :
acpi_dsdt_load="YES"
in the loader.conf file.
However, when I write to the Matrix
> >Ahh, but the line in rc.conf should be like that:
> >
> >defaultrouter="192.158.0.1"
>
> Thanks for the follow up Dmitry. Right now I've got the typo'd line
> commented out on /etc/rc.conf and am accomplishing this with the line
I apologize for this corrupted info that I sent.
> 1. what's the
At 10:13 AM 11/13/2003, Dmitry Kochetov wrote:
Ahh, but the line in rc.conf should be like that:
defaultrouter="192.158.0.1"
Thanks for the follow up Dmitry. Right now I've got the typo'd line
commented out on /etc/rc.conf and am accomplishing this with the line
route add default 192.168.0.7 in
Greetings,
Thursday, November 13, 2003, 12:21:00 AM, you wrote:
ML> At 03:32 PM 11/12/2003, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>Add the following to your /etc/rc.conf file:
>>
>>default_router="192.168.0.1"
>>
Ahh, but the line in rc.conf should be like that:
defaultrouter="192.158.0.1"
Wrong syntax, did
At 03:32 PM 11/12/2003, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Add the following to your /etc/rc.conf file:
default_router="192.168.0.1"
and then perform the following command to get it online without a reboot:
# route add default 192.168.0.1
Steve, I decided to add the line to rc.conf and then shutdown... have
> I had everything working as evidenced by installing a port or two -
> including the Lynx browser which worked; then rebooted last night and now
> can't get dns working again.
>
> My LAN has a windoz xp box with dial up and ICS enabled. It is 192.168.0.1
> on the network. My FBSD box will ping to
I had everything working as evidenced by installing a port or two -
including the Lynx browser which worked; then rebooted last night and now
can't get dns working again.
My LAN has a windoz xp box with dial up and ICS enabled. It is 192.168.0.1
on the network. My FBSD box will ping to localhos
I am a newbie to FreeBSD and just did a pretty thorough install for QMAIL
SQUIRRELMAIL and CourierIMAP. When I went to reboot the system, i am now
getting the following error messages:
warning: unable to stat mess/1/1
warning: unable to stat mess/2/2
warning: unable to stat mess/3/3
warning
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 11:42, stan wrote:
> I'm trying to get a STABLE machien converted from Gnome 1 to Gnome 2. I
> think I've deleted all the Gnome 1 ports, but whne I try to build the
> Gnome2 port it's still complaining about the presence of Gnome 1 bits.
>
> Here is the ouptut of pkg_info on
I'm trying to get a STABLE machien converted from Gnome 1 to Gnome 2. I
think I've deleted all the Gnome 1 ports, but whne I try to build the
Gnome2 port it's still complaining about the presence of Gnome 1 bits.
Here is the ouptut of pkg_info on the machine in question:
GimpUserManual-PDF-2
Ima
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:03 PM
Subject: apache + Frontpage extensions = I have a mess
> Greetings,
> I am running 4.7 stable as I previously posted. I was running apache13
> without frontpage.
> Due to measure beyond my control I must enable frontpage extensions on my
> we
> Greetings,
> I am running 4.7 stable as I previously posted. I was running apache13
> without frontpage.
> Due to measure beyond my control I must enable frontpage extensions on my
> webserver.
Please tell your boss that running FP extensions is an invitation for
hackers and will be more of a m
Greetings,
I am running 4.7 stable as I previously posted. I was running apache13
without frontpage.
Due to measure beyond my control I must enable frontpage extensions on my
webserver.
I went to /usr/ports/www/apache13 and did make deinstall. I then went to
/usr/ports/www/mod_frontpage and did
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daxbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Quoting Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daxbert
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > Quoting Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice -
>
Quoting Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daxbert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > Quoting Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice -
> it's
> > > > max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It see
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daxbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Quoting Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice - it's
> > > max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It seems a bit bloated and
> > > I certainly don't need all
What I did was move my distfiles directory elsewhere and made a symbolic
link to it.
That means that the pointers are still valid in every compile, but they
exist elsewhere...
You could just empty distfiles with a rm -rf /usr/ports/distfiles/*
(don't forget the *)
Anthony
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, Daxbert wrote:
>
> This will get your distfile downloads out of
> /usr/ports as well. However, there's probably
> a cleaner way to do this via a make.conf setting.
DISTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/ports/distfiles
should do it.
Cheers,
Scott
--
===
7;t take care of the full b-dep dependancy list.
>
> Hmmm... now, that's interesting.
>
> I did portupgrade of imake (without any special options) before
> upgrading XFree86 as I needed to use the computer (WinXP) and had to
> wait until off hours to upgrade the rest. So, I&
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:31, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> > I just upgrade XFree86 from 4.2 to 4.3 using portupgrade on 2 different
> > machines.
> That statement doesn't make sense. Portupgrade upgrades pors, not the
> system. So you can't upgrade from 4
At 2003-03-14T03:06:33Z, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Delete everything in "/usr/ports/distfiles". And before you go to bed one
> night do a "make clean" from "/usr/ports". It takes some time...
`portsclean -CD' does pretty much the same thing in about 1% as much time.
--
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
