Anyone have this all-in-one functioning correctly under FreeBSD?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
RW wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:49:52 -0400
Bob Hall wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:34:40AM +, Mark wrote:
Actually, this has got very little to do with being a native English
speaker or not. It's ere a matter of intonation (which, in writing,
can only be conveyed to a certain
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:49:52 -0400
Bob Hall wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:34:40AM +, Mark wrote:
> > Actually, this has got very little to do with being a native English
> > speaker or not. It's ere a matter of intonation (which, in writing,
> > can only be conveyed to a certain degree,
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:07:25 -0400
> From: PJ
> Subject: Re: I hate to bitch but bitch I must
> To: Polytropon
> Cc: Steve Bertrand ,
> "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org"
>
> Message-ID: <4ada23fd.8020...@videotron.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Po
PJ wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>
> I think you're trying to take the meaning of "should" a little too
> far... to keep it simple, and without trying to intellectualize it, it
> simply means (and this can change within certain contexts) "normally, it
> should work" (in our context, here) but there is no im
On 10/17/09, Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 17.10.2009, 18:49 -0600 schrieb Tim Judd:
>> On 10/17/09, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>>
>>
>> > You do not need to. dump alrady writes that when it finishes each time.
>> > If you to that, you will get a second one at that location.
>> >
>> > You
Am Samstag, den 17.10.2009, 18:49 -0600 schrieb Tim Judd:
> On 10/17/09, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
>
> > You do not need to. dump alrady writes that when it finishes each time.
> > If you to that, you will get a second one at that location.
> >
> > You do not need to do the rewind and mt fsf bet
On 10/17/09, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> You do not need to. dump alrady writes that when it finishes each time.
> If you to that, you will get a second one at that location.
>
> You do not need to do the rewind and mt fsf between each dump. I just
> do it to make it very clear to myself in my sc
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 08:43:26PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
> Replies inline
>
> On 10/16/09, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:13:21PM +0200, Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> one example: If I have three partitions and I want to backup every day
> >> these
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>> PJ wrote:
>
>>> Now, does that mean that glabel does not work if there are several
>>> disks
>>> on the system... it certainly does not say so nor does it adv ertise
>>> that this would not work if there are several ATA disks present..
>>> Previousl
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 05:54:23PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Why is it that the manual pages, as thorough as they may be, are very,
> very confusing.
> Perhaps I am being too wary, but I find that too many
> instructions/examples are stumbling blocks to appreciation of the whole
> system:
> for instance
Polytropon wrote:
note there I have also used glabel on the swap (command used was glabel
label /dev/ad10p1)
A really honest question: What does the "p" in "ad10p1"
indicate? I always thought swap partitions are something
like "ad10b" (an own partition right after the root
partition a).
ad10
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
PJ wrote:
Now, does that mean that glabel does not work if there are several disks
on the system... it certainly does not say so nor does it adv ertise
that this would not work if there are several ATA disks present..
Previously I had also tried a reboot press 4 with exa
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:50:51 +0100, krad wrote:
> easiest way is to boot in on a live cd/usb label it all up with tunefs and
> edit the fstabs then reboot off disks
Yes, that's the most comfortable way. FreeBSD's live disc should
be completely fine. There's no problem with "should work on /
even
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:07:25 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Just a note: I find it strange that nobody looked into the problem of
> the confusion... I thought I had pointed out where the co;nfusion
> arises... and no one seems to have either understood the
> inconsistencies or bothere to read the explanation.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:47:56 +0100, krad wrote:
> he has a raw file system on that device, ie dangerously dedicated, no
> partitions etc
That's the standard mode for data disks that are not intended
to be booted from. It's usable for USB sticks as well. There's
no need for a slice.
The comment "
PJ wrote:
>
> manual: "it is assumed that a single ATA disk is used, which is
> currently recognized by the system as ad0. It is also assumed that the
> standard FreeBSD partition scheme is used, with /, /var, /usr and /tmp
> file systems, as well as a swap partition."
>
> Now, does that mean that
PJ wrote:
michael wrote:
PJ wrote:
Why is it that the manual pages, as thorough as they may be, are very,
very confusing.
Perhaps I am being too wary, but I find that too many
instructions/examples are stumbling blocks to appreciation of the whole
system:
for instance, let's look at the
2009/10/17 Manolis Kiagias
> PJ wrote:
> > Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> >
> >> PJ wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Manolis, my state of mind is quite clear... and I'm coping with
> >>> everything quite allright... I'm not about to get mad at anyone or
> >>> anything...
> >>> but tell me, honestly, when you see
PJ wrote:
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Manolis, my state of mind is quite clear... and I'm coping with
>>> everything quite allright... I'm not about to get mad at anyone or
>>> anything...
>>> but tell me, honestly, when you see the stuff I have described above?
>>>
2009/10/17 PJ
> michael wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >> Why is it that the manual pages, as thorough as they may be, are very,
> >> very confusing.
> >> Perhaps I am being too wary, but I find that too many
> >> instructions/examples are stumbling blocks to appreciation of the whole
> >> system:
> >> f
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, PJ wrote:
Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Bob Hall wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:27:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
BUGS
This utility should work on active file systems.
I'm a native English speaker, and the manual makes perfect sense to me.
It's very clear to me that
2009/10/17 PJ
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >
> >> Manolis, my state of mind is quite clear... and I'm coping with
> >> everything quite allright... I'm not about to get mad at anyone or
> >> anything...
> >> but tell me, honestly, when you see the stuff I have described above?
> >> Wo
Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:17:29 +0100, Vincent Hoffman
> wrote:
>
>> yes. this makes a ufs label which you can access via /dev/ufs
>> for example (my home system)
>> jh...@ostracod
>> (23:08:34 <~>) 0 $ ls /dev/ufs
>> SCRATCH SSDROOT SSDUSR SSDVAR
>> [
2009/10/16 Matthew Seaman :
> Kikachi Kozumi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried installing phpMyAdmin in an ezjail created jail already
>> installed with apache22, mysql and php5 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE
>> i386 with no X11 (headless).
>> The port install failed when dependency 'libXau-1.0.4' config
b. f. wrote:
If you look at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, you will see that Fedora 10
is now the default emulation port on new releases of FreeBSD (I don't
know why it isn't on earlier versions: you can ask bsam@ why he chose
800076 as the cutoff, and not some other value. There may have been
some
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:17:29 +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> yes. this makes a ufs label which you can access via /dev/ufs
> for example (my home system)
> jh...@ostracod
> (23:08:34 <~>) 0 $ ls /dev/ufs
> SCRATCH SSDROOT SSDUSR SSDVAR
> [...]
> /dev/ufs/SCRATCH on /scratc
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:37:32 -0400,
>> Jerry McAllister said:
J> You can easily put more than one dump on a tape if there is room enough
J> for them. I actually rewind and skip between each dump of multiples
J> made to the same tape. I also use the no-rewind device for the tape.
Wheneve
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, PJ wrote:
> But can you explain what this means? It just is not clear for me.
> "# tu;nefs -L home /dev/da3"
> This puts a label on that disk? So now it can be referred to as home?
> da3 = home ?
Yes, exactly that's the purpose. In such a setting, da3 would
ref
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:10:42 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Here are the outputs:
>
> fstab:
> # DeviceMountpointFStypeOptionsDumpPass#
> /dev/ad12s1bnoneswapsw00
> /dev/ad12s1a/ufsrw11
> /dev/ad12s1h/backups
PJ wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Why is it that the manual pages, as thorough as they may be, are very,
>>> very confusing.
>>> Perhaps I am being too wary, but I find that too many
>>> instructions/examples are stumbling blocks to appreciation of the whole
>>> system:
>>> f
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:28:18 -0400, PJ wrote:
> From the way things are written, it would appear that one must do tunefs
> before doing glabel and that they are interdependent.
As it has been mentioned ealier and as far as I understood:
"tunefs -L" is for UFS file systems only, while "glabel labe
michael wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Why is it that the manual pages, as thorough as they may be, are very,
>> very confusing.
>> Perhaps I am being too wary, but I find that too many
>> instructions/examples are stumbling blocks to appreciation of the whole
>> system:
>> for instance, let's look at the i
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 05:36:43PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Bob Hall wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:34:40AM +, Mark wrote:
> >
> >> Actually, this has got very little to do with being a native English
> >> speaker or not. It's ere a matter of intonation (which, in writing, can
> >> only be
On 10/17/09, Yuri wrote:
> b. f. wrote:
>>
>> That entry also says that Fedora 8 can be used, which was the latest
>> Linux base port at the time the entry was made, and the skype port
>> Makefile says Fedora Core 6 __or later__ can be used. So presumably
>> later Linux base ports will also work
Bob Hall wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:34:40AM +, Mark wrote:
>
>> Actually, this has got very little to do with being a native English
>> speaker or not. It's ere a matter of intonation (which, in writing, can
>> only be conveyed to a certain degree, of course). 'Should' can certainly
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>
>>> PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:54:23 -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>
>> but from man tunefs:
>> BUGS
>>
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>> Manolis, my state of mind is quite clear... and I'm coping with
>> everything quite allright... I'm not about to get mad at anyone or
>> anything...
>> but tell me, honestly, when you see the stuff I have described above?
>> Woldn't that confuse anyone in
I upgraded to OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 (from f6) in /etc/make.conf.
And now scim menu from linux skype doesn't allow to choose any languages
but English.
How to fix?
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
b. f. wrote:
That entry also says that Fedora 8 can be used, which was the latest
Linux base port at the time the entry was made, and the skype port
Makefile says Fedora Core 6 __or later__ can be used. So presumably
later Linux base ports will also work: try the most recent Linux base
emulati
Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Bob Hall wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:27:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> BUGS
> This utility should work on active file systems.
>>
>> I'm a native English speaker, and the manual makes perfect sense to me.
>> It's very clear to me that since the s
Mark wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of PJ
> Sent: zaterdag 17 oktober 2009 3:50
> To: Steve Bertrand
> Cc: Polytropon; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: I hate to bitch but bitch I
Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:29:04 -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>> It is simple to understand Emglish but not so simple what was meant by
>> whoever wrote it...I cannot correct something that I do not uderstand...
>> come on, man, that should be easy to understand.
>>
>
> As English is
Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm thinking to build a Raid on my system and I'm getting documented
abut 0+1 and 1+0 RAID systems.
As far as I can see the best option is a 1+0 is the best option as if
one of the from mirrors fails, the RAID still be redundant and in the
case of a 0+1 RAID, If o
Hi folks,
I'm thinking to build a Raid on my system and I'm getting documented
abut 0+1 and 1+0 RAID systems.
As far as I can see the best option is a 1+0 is the best option as if
one of the from mirrors fails, the RAID still be redundant and in the
case of a 0+1 RAID, If one of them fails, the RA
in message <20091017005844.77c28cc1.free...@edvax.de>,
wrote Polytropon thusly...
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:43:37 +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > Is this your normal '/' filesystem, and is it mounted? If it is
> > reboot your system and select 'single user mode' from the
> > loader.menu
> > Th
On 10/17/09, Yuri wrote:
> b. f. wrote:
>
> Record 20080318 in /usr/ports/UPDATING says that in order for skype to
> work OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6 should be set. I did that in order to
> make skype work. I believe latest versions of skype don't work work
> FreeBSD because FreeBSD only uses OS
b. f. wrote:
Why I get these messages about GLIBCXX_3.4.9? Is it a bug in port? Or in
package? Or in system?
/etc/make.conf has the line, if that matters:
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6
Yes, it does matter. This is a binary port, and the party that built
the binaries (Google) comp
>Why I get these messages about GLIBCXX_3.4.9? Is it a bug in port? Or in
>package? Or in system?
>/etc/make.conf has the line, if that matters:
>OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6
Yes, it does matter. This is a binary port, and the party that built
the binaries (Google) compiled them against a fairly
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:27:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:54:23 -0400, PJ wrote:
> >> but from man tunefs:
> >> BUGS
> >> This utility should work on active file systems.
> >> What in hades does this mean--just above it says cannot be run on active
> >> fil
Theoretically if you sent a syn packet from the same source port at
tne same time as you reloaded the rules you coyld get around it.
However the practicalities of this make it not worth the hassle,
especially if you dont control the firewall yiur traversing through
the client end. Best to live with
2009/10/17 Dánielisz László :
> Hello,
>
> I have the following annoying thing: all the time I runpfctl -F all -f
> /etc/pf.conf I got disconnected from my remote machine.
> Do you have any idea how can I avoid this?
If you are just trying to reload the changes made to pf.conf, use
"/etc/rc.d/pf
Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 20:43 -0600 schrieb Tim Judd:
> Replies inline
>
> On 10/16/09, Jerry McAllister wrote:
--8<
snip, snap...
--8<
> > Something like mt fsf 1will skip over the first dump file
> > so you can write the second.mt fsf 2 will skip over two files,
Nerius Landys wrote:
> dd if=/dev/ad4 of=MBR_backup bs=512 count=1
to back up the MBR, so I can recontruct the boot program and partition
table. But they don't mention that in the Handbook.
While that will back up the Master Boot Record, it's not sufficient for
the general case of MS-DOS s
On 17 okt 2009, at 11:53, Dánielisz László
wrote:
Hello,
I have the following annoying thing: all the time I runpfctl -F all -
f /etc/pf.conf I got disconnected from my remote machine.
Do you have any idea how can I avoid this?
You cannot avoid when you flush all your current states.
Hello,
I have the following annoying thing: all the time I runpfctl -F all -f
/etc/pf.conf I got disconnected from my remote machine.
Do you have any idea how can I avoid this?
Here is my pf.conf
#MACROS
ext_if="rl0"
int_if="rl1"
good_ip="{192.168.1.0/24}"
icmp_types="echoreq"
set skip on lo
56 matches
Mail list logo
