On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, John Klos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find it a little odd that a clean install of FreeBSD 11.0 on amd64
> > followed by:
> >
> > portsnap fetch ; portsnap extract
al/bin/2to3-2, this should be suffixed.
FWIW, if there you have no special requirements, I would suggest you
to install pre-built packages with pkg(1).
Best,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
https://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 14:04:27 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 15/11/2015 7:30 AM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just read this thread:
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2015-November/009061.html
> >
> > This inspire me that
dbus
devel/py3-dbus
in ports, which generate
py27-dbus-1.2.0_1
py34-dbus-1.2.0_1
packages, so I think that the version suffix in port name is not
really needed. Or will trimming that make some other conflicts?
Any idea?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http:/
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 13:10:41 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015, at 07:15, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:36:54 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015, at 10:30, Mark Felder wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 20
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:36:54 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015, at 10:30, Mark Felder wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015, at 10:27, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > > Thanks for the update. I have the same patch with you. But I haven't
> > > had www/py-djan
t; changes) I am moving forward with pushing these updates and merging to
> the quarterly branch.
Thanks for the update. I have the same patch with you. But I haven't
had www/py-django-devel pass the poudriere test. Are you working on
that too?
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http:/
lan to commit it next week.
BTW, I will not be available on 6/19~22, if anyone wants to pick it up
and commit it, you're welcomed!
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
ortsnap fetch update
>
> That made no difference at all.
>
> Does anybody maintain this?
I believe it's because you're having python 2.7.3, try to upgrade it
to the latest version in lang/python27 then install
x11-toolkits/py-tkinter again.
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
r Apache are configured. I've CCed the FreeBSD mailing lists
> for those.
>
It looks like that PTH option is enabled when building Python. I can
build mod_wsgi{,3} correctly with default options of Python. But I
don't have time to check wha
IN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
> >
> > iEYEARECAAYFAlEy6WEACgkQdLJIhLHm/OlXlwCfRXWOPSk2cJ725IjYx9jeEy1+
> > Pb8AoL34Lr6ffYhsMeQgU8SreN8U6P4+
> > =3TVO
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> "
>
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
)
with other standard libraries.
- Improve consistency of the Makefile(s)
- Whitespace cleanup for the patches
Please help with testing and give me some comments, I plan to commit this
earlier next week.
Thanks,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpS044Bys5CB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 21:25:03 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 00:00:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > > On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for working o
orrect version instead of a
> symlink?
I'm not sure we'll have much advantage from this, what's the magic you
proposed to do behind the "selects the correct version" ?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@free
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 00:00:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch.
> >>
> >
> > Hello
widely used.
> I think that the state of the system should not depend on the order
> packages are installed in.
How about an option? Let user can choose to be default version while
installing.
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-pytho
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 22:03:48 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 01.10.2012 21:51:
> >
> > EXTRACT_SUFX?= .tgz
> > PYTHON_DISTFILE= Python-${PYTHON_PORTVERSION:S/.rc/rc/}}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
>
> Yes, I also bow to this option.
>
> > then we
.tgz:
PYTHON_DISTFILE= Python-${PYTHON_PORTVERSION:S/.rc/rc/}.tgz
to:
EXTRACT_SUFX?= .tgz
PYTHON_DISTFILE= Python-${PYTHON_PORTVERSION:S/.rc/rc/}}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
then we can define USE_XZ= yes in the ports we want to use xz
distfile, which handles
${EXTRACT_SUFX} and ${EXTRACT_DEPENDS} correc
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 15:22:03 +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 17:00, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >
> > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
> > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
> > confliction on b
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 17:17:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> On 9/26/12 5:00 PM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >
> > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
> > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
> > confliction on b
ill possible to have more then one
lang/python2X or lang/python3X ports installed. Maybe we can use the
same logic of bin/python installation (first wins).
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
ust commit one you like.
BTW, should we bother portmgr at this point? I believe they have much
more important things need to deal with. But I am still happy to hear
any suggestion from them if they want to step in.
Regards,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
Hi Vitaly,
Thanks for working on this, is it possible for you to file a PR of
this to prevent it being overwhelmed by the mails and other issues in
the queue?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
}/www/zope213
and then, .if defined(USE_ZOPE) section can be written as:
RUN_DEPENDS+= ${ZOPE_DEPENDS}
How do you think?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
-1.1.2
> ispell-3.3.02_4 p5-Archive-Tar-1.38_1p5-Net-SSLeay-1.35
> xextproto-7.0.2
> javavmwrapper-2.3.2 p5-Archive-Zip-1.24 p5-Net-Server-0.97
> xf86bigfontproto-1.1.2
> jpeg-6b_7p5-Authen-SASL-2.12
> p5-PathTools-3.270
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:02:11 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:51:23 +0800
> Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
> > wrote:
> > > Hi, Martin,
> > >
> >
>
> +if ${ZOPE_VERSION} == "2.13"
> +ZOPE_PORTSDIR= ${PORTSDIR}/www/zope213
> .else
You are the Zope expert!
> I prefer to keep it as zope213 for some time.
We do, too. Do you have a plan for updating www/zope to 2.13? BTW,
what's the status of
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:03:01 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:42, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> >> I am using virtualenv --no-site-packages (the default now) to be able
> >> to build an environ
t direction. But this patch is not a good
solution, we need to handle PYDISTUTILS_INSTALLARGS better instead of
putting between bsd.port.{pre,post}.mk . Please tell me if there is a
better way to do this. Thanks.
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
__
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:17:08 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reporting this, I would perform a survey about what are
> the values others set to THREAD_STACK_SIZE first, then deciding what
> we should pick for the default value.
>
> Folks on freebsd-pyth
Looks good, please go ahead commit and close the related PRs.
Thanks for your help!
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 19:02, Sofian Brabez wrote:
> Hi python@,
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:02:43PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> Hello Sofian,
>>
>> Thanks for working on this, p
ror/twisted/, that's why I removed them from
MASTER_SITES, could you check it again?
Please consider my suggestions, thanks!
> Regards
>
> [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/twisted-11.0.0.diff
> [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~sbz/twisted-11.0.0.diff
>
> --
> Sofian Brabez
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this, I would perform a survey about what are
the values others set to THREAD_STACK_SIZE first, then deciding what
we should pick for the default value.
Folks on freebsd-python list, comments are always welcome and appreciated.
Best,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http
hics/py-qt4-svg/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.8.3/QtSvg/Makefile
> sed:
> /var/tmp/usr/local/ports/graphics/py-qt4-svg/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.8.3/QtSvg/Makefile:
> No such file or directory
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/local/ports/graphics/py-qt4-svg.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/local/por
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 07:55:01 +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> And what about ports/156811?
Oh, sorry for keeping this so long. I think it's right direction, does
anyone object changing precedence 3.2.x over 3.1.x for Python3k?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpHvYeXi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:56:13 +0800, wen heping wrote:
> 2011/7/13 Li-Wen Hsu :
> > The following reply was made to PR ports/158850; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: Li-Wen Hsu
> > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
> > Cc: wenhep...@gmail.com
> >
The following reply was made to PR ports/158850; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Li-Wen Hsu
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: wenhep...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ports/158850: [Update]lang/python32: update to 3.2.1
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:25:32 +0800
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text
just don't want to maintain another .mk file. Creating Python 3 ports
is fine, which gives us a pre-built binary package on ftp, that's good
and we already have some, like databases/py25-bsddb . The only thing
need to take care is setting CONFLICTS in Makefile(s) correctly. Some
py-
-- Forwarded message from Li-Wen Hsu -
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:50:45 +0800
From: Li-Wen Hsu
To: pyt...@freebsd.org
Subject: What's the perfered name for zope related modules?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Hello all,
I'm working on www/py-pyramid port, which needs some othe
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 22:24, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 15:15, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Tried to build fresh lang/python32 today and it fails when configured
>> without UCS4 support:
>>
>> ===> Building for pytho
gt;
> Tested on 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64.
>
This is because when WITHOUT_UCS4 is defined, the shared library name
will become "libpython3.2m.so"
Please refer to [1], which also be discussed recently.
I'm working on a patch for supporting these options.
[1]
http://docs.python.org/py3k/whats
nned
schedule to have these zope update in the tree?
And, what's your opinion about the zope port naming?
Thanks,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpt6me5zmV9D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uild options) to coexist.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com???? | Brisbane, Australia
>
>
>
> --
> 真理��??有???胜?，真理只有在???持??的人死去后才成???真理。
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpJFmX8Lc6Ot.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 14:07:42 +0800, wen heping wrote:
> 2011/2/24 Li-Wen Hsu :
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:57:59 +0800, wen heping wrote:
> >> 2011/2/24 Martin Wilke :
> >> > \o/
> >> >
> >> > good job!
> >>
> >> +
27;t it be in pre-everyting:: ?)
Could you tell me what these bugs are?
Thanks,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpbER0u5O3gx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:46, Martin Wilke wrote:
> so far is ok with me, but i still feel the include vodoo is wrong.
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 22:48:43 +0800, wen heping wrote:
>> > Hi, all:
>> &g
n/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#PORTING-PKGNAME
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpyvElHnxE7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
list. Since I received some private mails about python32
updating, I'll point they to this list and put wen's files at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python32/
(hope wen would not mind ;-)
Currently I don't have time look into them, though
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgprDrtYkdrmX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator: Li-Wen Hsu
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/py-simplejson: update to 2.1.3
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: update
>Release:
st-test_socket.py (dead)
> 1.1 +11 -0
> ports/lang/python27/files/patch-Lib-test-test_threading.py (new)
> 1.4 +0 -11
> ports/lang/python27/files/patch-Lib_test_test_threading.py (dead)
> 1.84 +12 -8 ports/lang/python27/pkg-plist
--
Li-Wen Hsu
h
uot;key
ports". And it is
not recommended add a new port setting MAINTAINER to python@ unless this port
is really needed to maintained by the python team.
What are the modules you want to add? Thanks for working on python ports!
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
n24 yet, I'm fairly sure that the
> same patch for python25 will fix it as well.)
Since you have tested it, I think there no reason to object :-P
Please patch python24 as well. Thanks very much!
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
fr
#x27;t have been there (I was trying to test with python =
> 2.6 on my machine).
No worries, I've changed this before committing :)
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
best way is rebuilding your databases/sqlite3 with
EXTENSION option on, then rebuilding databases/py-sqlite3 .
I've filed a PR for turn this option default on:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149842
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpPKbpvdy0LF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in
/etc/make.conf, which makes 2.7 as your default python version.
But that might need to take care of other python modules in the
system, please refer to the entry that describes how to do when
the default python version switches from 2.5 to 2.6. (20090608)
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 03:11, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 18:27, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> hi,
>> I noticed that in ports/lan/python27 it actually
>> compiles 2.6.5!
>> and surprisingly, I discovered that 2.7 is as of today 'official&#
bsd-pyt...@.
Thanks,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
000 +0800
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
> #
>
> _PYTHON_PORTBRANCH= 2.6
> -_PYTHON_ALLBRANCHES= 2.6 2.5 2.4 3.1 # preferred first
> +_PYTHON_ALLBRANCHES= 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 3.1 # preferred first
I don't think it is suitable for placing 2.7 at the first in the
preferred ver
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 21:25:03 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 17:50:57 +0800, Sutra Zhou wrote:
> > I'm new to the freebsd-python mailing list, I don't know how to reply to the
> > following thread
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free
ut this question.
I'm still waiting for the reply from the maintainers of the ports which
depend on jython. By the way, you are definitely welcomed to test this
patch and please give feedback if it works or not. Thanks very much!
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpB0SlPfjn6x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:29:59 +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is the patch for updating Jython to 2.5.1:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/jython/jython.diff
>
> Are we
ython/tn5250j.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/jython/venice.diff
Sorry that I didn't test about the functionality, but all of them
are tested in the tinderbox.
Please give me some feedback about these patches.
Thanks,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
pgpnAKiD407Vo.pgp
Descri
The following reply was made to PR ports/142163; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Li-Wen Hsu
To: Hizel Ildar
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/142163: [NEW PORT] sysutils/py-supervisor: System to
monitor and control a number of processes on UNIX-like OS
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02
The following reply was made to PR ports/142440; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Li-Wen Hsu
To: codebl...@eighthbit.net
Cc: co...@211.ru, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/142440: New Port: databases/py-south0.6
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:13:27 +0800
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type
The following reply was made to PR ports/140937; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Li-Wen Hsu
To: n...@nelson.name
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, w...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/140937: [Update] all py-twisted* ports to 9.0.0
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:13:01 +0800
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:55:02 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:54:51AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:37:40 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > > > >&
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:37:40 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think these two are not an issue. �Default Python version is switched
> > >> to 2.6.
> > >>
> > >
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 22:55, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME
databases/py25-bsddb pyt...@freebsd.org
I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to 2.6.
But how this report generated? Switching happened before
databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied.
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http
kes
this suggestion?
(although I came to this idea after requesting repocopy databases/py-bsddb to
databases/py25-bsddb)
> Are there any more good ideas and solutions? I want to
> know your ideas.
>
That's great! Thanks work for Python on FreeBSD!
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.o
as the default Python
version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree.
However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
ports tree?
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
hon.mk-python31.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python31.shar
For python2*, I'll update them after patches for python3* committed
(of course if nobody objects)
and probably include tmclaugh@'s patch in ports/109550 for python*. I
think this matches
what bsd.python.mk does.
--
Li
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python26-2.6.2.log
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python30-3.0.1.log
Did anybody be aware this? Are these ignorable?
Or did I make any mistake in the test process?
Best Regards,
Li-Wen
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
gt; I'll take it.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130001
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The following reply was made to PR ports/123675; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Li-Wen Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports/123675: New port: deskutils/py-labyrinth Mind mapping
tool for Gnome written in Python
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Aron Stansvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! Could you perhaps tell me what those minor changes were? So
> that I learn until next time :)
The change is really minor, I only change
USE_PYTHON= 2.3+
to
USE_PYTHON= yes
since the least supported python
76 matches
Mail list logo
