On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 15:22:03 +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > On 26.09.2012 17:00, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > > > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying > > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of > > confliction on bin/python{2,3} between lang/python2X or lang/python3X > > ports. It is not so common but still possible to have more then one > > lang/python2X or lang/python3X ports installed. Maybe we can use the > > same logic of bin/python installation (first wins). > > > > I beleive that the vast majority of python[23] users will be fine with the > latest version of the relevant branch. > Considered that and also not to over complicate things I propose to make > python2/python3 symlink only for the latest version: python2 -> python2.7 > and python3 -> python3.2 for now. > > And leave python31, python25, python26 untouched. Users who really need > older > versions of python should explicitly require python version during startup. > > If it is OK for you, I can work out the final patch.
I think it's OK, and one more this might be helpful in the future is adding a condition like: .if ${PYTHON_VERSION} == ${PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION} then install the symlink. Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch. -- Li-Wen Hsu <lw...@freebsd.org> http://lwhsu.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"