On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote: > Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is > out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection > should not be extended.
Yes. But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Python version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree. However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the ports tree? -- Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org> http://lwhsu.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
