Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 06:39:46PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Hello, Diane,
I am having trouble getting fldigi to compile. Also, the binary install
core dumps (signal 11) on two different FreeBSD
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
Chris Maness KQ6UP
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
Version information:
fldigi 2.10
System: FreeBSD muon.kq6up.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb
24
19:59:52 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
Built on
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
...
Hamlib version 1.2.6.1
PortAudio V19-devel 1899
libsndfile-1.0.17
Abort trap: 6 (core
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:37AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Here is what I got after rebuilding.
...
Hamlib version 1.2.6.1
PortAudio V19-devel 1899
libsndfile-1.0.17
Abort trap: 6 (core
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:26:45AM -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
Resolved.
It never occured to me Chris was missing a soundcard. This is the
assert trap from portaudio2. ;-) It's a very cryptic message.
- Diane (VA3DB)
--
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does not
exist. I found it on slimdevices -- same MD5, SHA256, SIZE:
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/SqueezeCenter_v7.0.0/squeezecenter-7.0-noCPAN.tgz
After building successfully, it fails to start with some problems in Perl:
[E
debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...#0 0x289dd252 in
pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np () from /lib/libthr.so.3
[New LWP 100178]
(gdb)
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
has Exception.pm in its
> pkg_plist, it deletes the file.Note that the error is during the
> 'install' operation, not the 'build'.
>
> The 'right' answer that there should have been a note in UPDATING that
> warns that you need to:
> pkg_delete
ly did a force installation of the port and then
> deleted it normally. I have no idea if that would work for you or not.
Almost certainly would help in this case, if /var/db/pkg/Source* were
overwritten.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
he doc? the infomation I sent to you first
> weren't clear about it, sorry.
>
> So currently DOCS and NLS are set on if they are defined by the
> maintainer and only if they are defined by the maintainer.
>
> So no change expected at all from the
vious:
>
> if you have dir /var/db/pkg/Source/ does the +CONTENTS file in it look
> sane? When in doubt, post it.
> If you don't, any hits on:
> grep '^@pkgdep Source' /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS
The quotes are from @dirrmtry, so inserted by bsd.port.mk.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ver && ${COPYTREE_SHARE} \*
${JAVALIBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/wherever "-not -name \*.exe -and -not -name
\*.bat"
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 15 May 2012 16:09, "Dmitry Marakasov" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> There are software versions like, say, 1.1.git20120515, 1.1.beta2, 1.1.rc1
Thanks for following this up; since we discussed this I've been thinking
though- why put the git bit in anyway? Does it have anything special
apart from a date
On 15 May 2012 18:14, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> On 14 May 2012 18:23, Fernando Apesteguía
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
On 17 May 2012 20:58, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> On 15 May 2012 18:14, Fernando Apesteguía
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 a
On 17 May 2012 22:30, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>
> El 17/05/2012 22:29, "Chris Rees" escribió:
>>
>> On 17 May 2012 20:58, Fernando Apesteguía
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
>> > wrote:
>> >&g
; WANT_ variables are set by the port maintainer to prefer one version or
> variation of a dependency over another. Examples:
>
> WANT_OPENLDAP_VER= 23
> WANT_BDB_VER= 48
> WANT_PGSQL_VER= 90
> WANT_PHP_WEB= yes
>
Usually. Sometimes it's (ab)u
book, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in why
> '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'?
Because as much as possible, we try to standardise things like version
numbers and rc scripts, so people get a more consistent experience,
rather than bowing to
On 20 May 2012 20:28, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/12 3:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in
>>> why
>>> > '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'?
l work even if you delete all php5 packages as long as
> apache doesn't restart. But there are many applications who make
> certain php cli calls. Those will not work!
>
> So, my question to the maintainers is, was there a particular reason
> that ma
ses-- you can safely rm -rf
/tmp/beforenewxorg.
Feel free to subsitute /tmp if you don't have enough space (you'll
need ~5G at least to be safe, or redefine WRKDIRPREFIX).
Hope that helps,
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On 24 May 2012 21:15, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 19:43, Lars Eighner wrote:
>>
>> I *must* revert xorg to a point at which changing ttys works.
>>
>> portdowngrade does not seem to work with metaports -- apparently it does not
>> revert the dependencies
On 25 May 2012 14:09, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 22:43:08 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>
>> For the archive-- just thought-- even though I did a typo there,
>> DON'T use:
>>
>> mv file file.bak && echo something > file
>>
>>
however)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/Makefile#rev1.151
perl-5.8.9 is way past EOL and unsupported by perl@, is there a
particular reason you can't upgrade?
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 27 May 2012 16:54, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Sunday, May 27, 2012 a las 04:40:58PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió:
>
>> On 27 May 2012 16:14, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > # cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
>> >
On 27 May 2012 17:02, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 27 May 2012 16:54, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> El día Sunday, May 27, 2012 a las 04:40:58PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió:
>>
>>> On 27 May 2012 16:14, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
y many ports.
This is not generally allowed to happen, since these files are not verified
either. What needs to happen is for the port to fetch all necessary files
in the do-fetch stage.
Unfortunately this makes it more complicated, but otherwise our users are
simply better off fetching
, which isn't how ports are supposed to work.
I know 'having a port' is usually considered a good thing, but as I
said before, it's no easier or safer to install this via the port than
just download and run the script.
Also, on deinstall/upgrade the port will clobber anything
On 28 May 2012 09:57, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Sunday, May 27, 2012 a las 04:40:58PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió:
>
>> On 27 May 2012 16:14, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > # cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
>> >
with perl 5.12.4 and
>> spamassassin, built and run fine.
>> (and logs to prove it builds just fine)
>
> it did not built in my CVS based ports tree with perl5.12; sorry
>
grep ^PERL_VERSION /etc/make.conf
?
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@fr
On 28 May 2012 19:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, May 28, 2012 a las 07:38:34PM +0100, Chris Rees escribió:
>
>> > if you look into UPDATING it says in 20110622:
>> > ...
>> > If you want to switch to lang/perl5.12 from lang/perl5.{8,10} please
>&
On May 31, 2012 12:39 PM, "Per olof Ljungmark" wrote:
>
> I find KDE4 unusable and xfce a bit weak for my purposes so I'm trying to
stick to KDE3.
>
> Recent 9-STABLE amd64
>
> mv -f .deps/talkconn.Tpo .deps/talkconn.Po
> rm -f libmach.a
> ar cru libmach.a answmach.o forwmach.o talkconn.o
> ranlib
On 31 May 2012 17:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> On 05/31/12 14:16, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On May 31, 2012 12:39 PM, "Per olof Ljungmark" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I find KDE4 unusable and xfce a bit weak for my purposes so I'm trying t
On 31 May 2012 23:26, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 05:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 31 May 2012 17:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/31/12 14:16, Chris Rees wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2012 12:39
eb server by selecting
> one of 4 or none.
>
Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
cripts/raw-file/tip/libdepend/libdepend.sh
>
> I am receiving a: "This Connection is Untrusted" warning from Firefox
> when I attempt to connect to that URL. It is probably harmless;
> however, it certainly doesn't instill confidence is someone viewing the
> site
On Jun 2, 2012 9:29 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote:
>
> On 2-6-2012 15:24, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> >>
> >>> All the details has been docum
acing the KNOBS file
by
>> bsd.options.desc
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
>
>
> So I have a question from a consumer standpoint as opposed to a
maintainer standpoint. If we use portconf to store all of our WITH_*
options for ports, will that continue to work with ports th
mysql versions, similar to p5-DBD-Pg.
Actually, I'm looking at moving p5-DBD-Pg to versioned ports, since it
is less unpredictable to install a versioned port, the autodetection
logic is messy and packages are not built for any but the default
version.
Chris
_
On Jun 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "Palle Girgensohn" wrote:
>
> Chris Rees skrev:
> > On 8 June 2012 08:15, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> ...
> >> Adding
On 8 June 2012 23:01, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 06:34, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> So I have a question from a consumer standpoint as opposed to a
>>> maintainer standpoint. If we use portconf to store all of our WITH_*
>>> options for ports, will that continu
if ! ${SETENV} CC="${CC}" CPP="${CPP}" CXX="${CXX}" \
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" CPPFLAGS="${CPPFLAGS}" CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS}" \
So CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS are already added to CONFIGURE_ARGS.
I would suspect something m
On 9 June 2012 09:38, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from Doug Barton :
>
>> > My understanding is that one of the benefits of the new OPTIONS
>
>> On 06/08/2012 06:34, Chris Rees wrote:
>> >> So I have a question from a consumer standpoint as opposed to a
>
-,
Does the file /var/db/ports/firefox/options exist? Can you put it up
somewhere?
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100
>>> schrieb Chris Rees:
>>>
>>>> Er... people always test their c
don't forget that pkg_install is very close to death!
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 10 June 2012 20:46, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 10 June 2012 19:55, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> While pkgng is growing momentum I have a small suggestion for outgoing
>>> pkg_* tools.
>>> It
igfile.sample)
IGNORE= Please see UPDATING note {date}
.endif
Stick a note in UPDATING (perhaps like 20110815), and send a HEADSUP to ports@:
BEFORE you deinstall couchdb, make sure you take a backup of
default.ini, because the port will clobber it.
I've grabbed your PR and will inve
On 11 June 2012 08:57, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 08.06.2012 22:23, schrieb Chris Rees:
>> On Jun 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "Palle Girgensohn"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris Rees skrev:
>>>> On
'perl-5.12.4_4' is installed
>
Only difference between these two versions is the pthread option.
Is there a problem when you try to run strace?
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
-DPNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng15 \
> -DTIFF_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libtiff.so \
> -DTIFF_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include \
> -DTCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=${TCL_INCLUDE_DIR} \
I'm testing this now.
Plea
On 13 June 2012 21:51, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 13 June 2012 21:05, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> --- Makefile 2012-06-09 02:25:25.0 -0700
>> +++ Makefile.new 2012-06-13 12:12:26.0 -0700
>> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@
>>
> confirmed without any warnings.
>
> A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use
> something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for
> stability reasons...
>
New versions of Skype require ALSA. This is at their insistence.
Chris
On Jun 15, 2012 10:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100
> Chris Rees articulated:
>
> >On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Skype 4.0 for Linux i
to it?
.for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}
.endfor
(copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the
PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that).
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote:
>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't
>> we just add the category to it?
>>
>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}
>> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${c
only
>> >
>> lowercase?
>
> Yes lower case, the wiki is wrong.
My fault, someone convinced me otherwise a while ago :/
Fixed.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 20 June 2012 19:33, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 6/20/12 2:26 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 20 June 2012 10:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:58:21AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>>>
>
Best to include maintainer in CC.
On Jun 20, 2012 3:26 PM, "Kaya Saman" wrote:
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
H
> --
> Regards,
> Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hm also surely counts as fair use... I'm sure that if upstream were
told one of our kernel hackers were to attempt to fix their product on
another platform, who would say no?
Just ask them if unsure!
Chris
___
terGraphics;" "true"
> >
> > (i can send entire Makefile as needed.)
> >
> > Thanks so much,
> >
> > --
> > Waitman Gobble
> > San Jose California USA
>
>
> Thank you,
> I split up the sections with blank lines, but I think
es which are going to break update tools. I think it's
> very likely that only portmaster would survive.
Nah, the new maintainer for portupgrade is heavily involved in
development, and is actually now a pkgng developer.
Also, with pkgng the emphasis is more on binary upgrades. We
have are building
on unclean systems; sympathy for inability to build on heavily
modified machines is going to become less common.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
todo list (an understandable position, given the complexity).
Perhaps I could suggest that you try out poudriere package sets in the
meantime? You'll find it very fast, and discover the real power of
pkgng.
http://blog.etoilebsd.net/post/Home_made_pkgng_repo
Chris
can't provide it; mirroring
is forbidden.
http://www.real.com/licensing/faq.html
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t; resolution for this problem.
> > if you have a copy of it, that matches SIZE and SHA256, why not host it
> > and open a pr to change the master_sites?
>
> I would do that if the issue with
>
> http://www.real.com/licensing/f
ll graphical installation
> programs.
>
> I suppose I should try to somehow get rid of them.
Of course, disclosing the program that you are trying to port might
give some people some pointers :)
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
On 29 June 2012 17:58, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:40 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2012 4:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote:
>> >
>> > The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
>> > "BROKEN=unfetchable&qu
again. It is not an attractive position for the Project to
be put in; we do not provide ports for warez.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
son you didn't path the source? that is done normally.
and by PATCHDIR, you mean the already defined '${FILESDIR}' ?
>
PATCHDIR does exist, but not for long... use FILESDIR.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
/graphics/p5-chart
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: erlang-r14b04_2,1
Jimmy, you need to remove Lang/erlang14 from Lang/Makefile until you've
updated lang/erlang.
Sunpoet, you need to restore graphics/p5-chart or fix its dependent ports.
Chris
_
, I've fixed it-- since devel/p5-Chart is the new location
for devel/p5-chart, I've just switched them in the bugzilla ports.
Hopefully that's all of them.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
oke some of the ports who
> depends on icu.
>
> I don't know if this can be an acceptable short-term workaround for this
> por ?
I've been reliably informed that icu builds just fine on CURRENT from
1/July. I'll update my Tinderbox and let you know.
Chris
_
On 3 July 2012 19:35, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:22:
>
>> On 3 July 2012 12:51, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The port dev/icu fails to build in current due to an lock issue
>>>
On 3 July 2012 20:20, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:53:
>
>> On 3 July 2012 19:35, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:22:
>>>
>>>> On 3 July 2012 12:51, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
&
e available?
If not email it to me and I'll put it up for you.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 6 July 2012 20:31, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 6 July 2012 20:14, Fernando Apesteguía
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to send a shar(1) file for a new port but it exceeds the
>&
hout $LOCALBASE/bin in PATH? Maybe it's just a glitch
>> in redports setup?
>
>
> All ports should support non standard LOCALBASE. Please, submit
> a PR on the case with both patches and ask to assign to portmgr@.
> This change needs to be tested at an exp-run.
These patche
gt; on slow download lines.
We still have to support 7.x, which does not have xz.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
r-xr-x
>
> I don't see the point in making things mode u-w?
> 'Security' cannot be the case, as even setting dirs u-w, schg,
capabilities,
> read-only mount, etc will make no difference... for root, it's only
annoying for
> a moment.
>
> What standard / gu
sage mean?
>
It means that some of the files that it has installed are permission ugo+w.
This may or may not be a problem-- would you care if any random user
edited these? I mean ANY user!
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
> users of the above ports that they are seeing the same problem.
>
> Just FYI, this problem has not magically disappeared. :)
Is this a boost problem? Perhaps upstream might be more help.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
y changes to the slaves too, so I queue some builds
for net-p2p/transmission-daemon.
These use the modified transmission-cli.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
kage tools for doing batch
>>> upgrades (i.e. upgrading from one completely package set to another). pkgng
>>> adds that feature, and I find it a must for supporting large installations
>>> of
>>> machines that need automated management.
>>
>> An
/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/166488
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/167289
No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
Have you reminded them by email recently? Apache@ is a team, so it's
a little uncertain where timeo
On 14 July 2012 16:24, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr.
>
> One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets
> automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a comm
t seems to be interested enough and it is single line fix.
I've reassigned it to ipfw mailing list-- it's more appropriate for there.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port
On 14 July 2012 17:34, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>>> Is automatic unassignment possible?
>>
>> Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable.
>
> Why?
>
>> You can feel free to
>> bring it up here if you think that's happene
ml
>
> I would be gratefull is someone could check these ports, and gives
> us some feedback. And possibly commit them in the ports tree (category
> net-mgmt)...
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> Pierre
>
> P.S.: also PR 169509
Great start on the ports-- it'll
consequences of maintainer patches, it shouldn't be a problem.
>
> I don't expect anything to come of this suggestion, but I've always
wondered why more responsibility wasn't given to port maintainers who don't
have commit privileges.
I got around this by linking in my
ving that mapping is a lot easier than tweaking
commit privileges.
>
> Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I
think.
It also does away with the QA aspect that committers currently provide.
I'd like to repeat that people sufficiently familiar with the ports syste
On 18 Jul 2012 11:33, "John Marino" wrote:
>
> On 7/18/2012 12:19, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, "John Marino" wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I
>>
>> think.
_
>
>
> cd /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3:source ./
Env.Host.sh
> SRC_ROOT=/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3:
Command not found.
>
Two problems
3.5.5
> >
> > Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your
> > world is current enough to get the latest clang fixes?
>
> System and ports were updated (by csup) at 00:01 US Eastern
> time today.
>
've filed such in a PR.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170007
Thanks for noticing Alexey!
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${SAMBA_PORTNAME}/options
> /usr/ports/net/samba4-devel/Makefile:187:USE_RC_SUBR=
> ${SAMBA_PORTNAME}
I've usually seen category/port used.
I'm sure Timur will have a look, but for quicker results you could
send a PR with a patch.
Chris
___
un.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=&portname=valgrind&wildcard=
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=editors&portname=libreoffice&wildcard=
Valgrind is unmaintained, so it'll need someone to care for it!
Chris
___
ports/lang/php5/work/php-5.4.4/configure: No such file or directory
> *** [pre-configure] Error code 1
You must have interrupted the pre-configure stage.
Run make clean, and try again.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
le/Latest/,
that should help.
If you're running csh:
# setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/Latest/
# pkg_add -r xorg
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
dio/hydrogen/Makefile
Possibly due to an scons change. That was back in February however,
so I'm trying it out on my Tinderbox at the moment.
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To uns
701 - 800 of 1527 matches
Mail list logo
