ur "/etc/make.conf", haven't you?
Because otherwise the whole thread might be considered a false alert.
The ports system does not link with the ports' OpenSSL of its own
accord. Or at least not in a reliable/predictable manner. You have to
explicitly tell it what you wa
On 01.05.14 16:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 1, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Uwe Doering wrote:
>
>> I indeed wondered why this variable hadn't been mentioned so far. Guys,
>> you do have "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes" in your "/etc/make.conf", haven't you?
&
On 01.05.14 17:26, Uwe Doering wrote:
> On 01.05.14 16:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On May 1, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Uwe Doering wrote:
>>
>>> I indeed wondered why this variable hadn't been mentioned so far. Guys,
>>> you do have "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT
On 01.05.14 22:24, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 01.05.2014, at 18:12, Uwe Doering wrote:
> [...]
>> And it is also not mentioned there that it is, to
>> my knowledge, considered good practice to have that setting in
>> "/etc/make.conf" in order to avoid any confu
