Re: compat4x ldconfig

Simon Morgan wrote: > compat4x doesn't seem to be running ldconfig after it's installed You don't say what version you're using currently, but have you run mergemaster lately? The ldconfig magic for this stuff is in /etc/rc* now. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection

Re: New version of portmaster available for testing

Hans Lambermont wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Hans Lambermont wrote: >>> Doug Barton wrote: >>>> 3. Add -o option to replace an installed port with a new port from a >>>> different location (e.g., portmaster -o emulators/linux_base-fc4 >>>&

Re: call for testers: update print/acroread7 to 7.0.8

Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hi all, > > Adobe has released Adobe Reader 7.0.8 for Linux and > it seems to work properly on FreeBSD's Linux emulation > environment. > > I am planning to commit the necessary patch[*] to update > the port, but I would like to hear about if it works on other > systems

Re: cups-base build error

Olivier Certner wrote: > I've also seen that 12 hours ago. My ports tree was a few weeks old. I > then > cvsuped the ports tree, uninstalled cups-base and cups-lpr, that seemed to > come from the same origin (reported by pkgdb -Fu) which I felt was quite odd. > I finally recompiled cups-b

Ports support for RELENG_4 (Was: Re: Question about ports builds)

Mark Linimon wrote: > The burden of trying to keep everything working on 4 i386 branches, 3 > amd64 branches, and 3 sparc64 branches is too high at this point, especially > with the degree of drift in such things as header files and base compiler > between -4 and -5. Of course, most of these thin

Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....

yattaran wrote: > I then replaced db42 with db44: > portmaster -o /usr/ports/databases/db44 db42-4.2.52_4 I have to say, using portmaster to fix portupgrade is not an application I had in mind when I wrote it, but you do get points for creativity. :) > Then figured out what depended on db44: > p

Re: firefox + cups problem

M. Warner Losh wrote: > With my old laptop, a FreeBSD/i386 box running current, I was able to > print to my cups printers w/o a problem with firefox. > > That laptop died a horrible death. So I bought a amd64 laptop and am > running FreeBSD/amd64. Every time I print now in firefox, firefox > die

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Friday 14 July 2006 08:58, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> What's the gain? > > I believe I mentioned some of gains in first mail. There is also the benefit > of less divergence to upstreams as ./configure scripts of various ports > use /usr/local as default prefix, but more im

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Actually, I didn't mean the prefix that some port installs into would be the > truble, rather where given port looks for includes, libraries and other files > from ports that it depends upon. But that's all part of the same issue. If the port is prefix-clean, than this won

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

Brooks Davis wrote: > Assuming we deal with all the conflicting ports in the first round > I don't fully buy this argument. If most people can simply upgrade > the ports in question then "rm -rf /usr/X11RC && ln -s /usr/local > /usr/X11R6" will take care of config files. That's admittedly a larg

New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks to all who've sent in their bugs, suggestions, and ideas for improvement, I've got a new version of portmaster ready for those who would like to check it out. It implements the following: 1. Trap a ^C (SIGINT) to the parent process, and attempt

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions. Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/hplip and > CUPS 1.2.0? Yes. You need to follow the instructions at file:///usr/local/share/doc/hplip-0.9.11/install/step4/cups/net.htm

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

Ricardo A. Reis wrote: > Hi Barton, > > > More one idea for portmaster, is possible limit the number of > concurrent fetch ? [ snip ] >I use portmaster for update 138 ports and now i don't have more > bandwidth :-( heh, sorry about that. I could look into the idea of limiting the numb

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

Hans Lambermont wrote: > While testing the new version I ran into a -o problem, so it's not > related to the 10 improvements, but here it is : > > I started with this situation : > > # pkg_info | grep avahi > avahi-0.6.10_3 Service discovery on a local network > > # pkg_info -R avahi-0.6.10

Re: HEADS UP: BIND9's resolver and reentrant version of netdb functions are MFC'ed

Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > I've just MFC'ed the BIND9's resolver stuff and reentrant version of > netdb functions. > It is known that some ports are confused by existence of reentrant > functions. So, I've bumped __FreeBSD_version to 601103. This is very exciting stuff! Thanks for your hard

Re: FreeBSD Port: net/bfilter: rc.d script broken

Nikolaus Waxweiler wrote: > Hi, > there's a bug in the rc.d script that prevents bfilter from being > stopped: "sig_stop=-KILL" should be "sig_stop=KILL", since the script > adds a "-" automatically. Currently, a "kill --KILL " is issued, > which does nothing. The script waits for bfilter to stop u

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

Doug Barton wrote: > I just uploaded a version that has what should be a fix for this, can you > give it a try? And thanks for catching this, you're right, it's an oversight > on my part. Hans, I'm curious if you've had a chance to try that fix, as I'd like

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

Hans Lambermont wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> I just uploaded a version that has what should be a fix for this, can >>> you give it a try? And thanks for catching this, you're right, it's >>> an oversight on my

Re: dependencies

Emil Holmstr|m wrote: > Isn't it a better way to fix +REQUIRED_BY than by portmaster? Well, portmaster is a pretty good solution, but then again, I'm biased. > Or better no need to fix it all. > > Scenario: > I install port a, it requires port b and c. > After a while a new version of port a, I

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've just uploaded a new version of portmaster to http://dougbarton.us/portmaster that in addition to the stuff from the message below, also implements the following: 1. Fix handling of [/usr/ports/]foo/bar as second option to -o 2. Correctly handle

Re: portmaster, bison, java/jdk15

Jeremy Messenger wrote: > It is a known issue, I have reported to Doug a while back. *nod* > As for solution, right now I am thinking about check on each port's > conflict. Like for example: > > - Check on if devel/bison has any of CONFLICT. > - CONFLICTS is devel/bison2, then check if

LOCALBASE vs. X11BASE (head to head deathmatch!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, I'm kidding about the deathmatch part. :) I have put some thought, and testing into this question though, so I thought I would post my results. First the conclusion. IMO the ideal technical solution would be to add a new variable, something li

Re: portmaster, bison, java/jdk15

Doug Barton wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> It is a known issue, I have reported to Doug a while back. > > *nod* > >> As for solution, right now I am thinking about check on each port's >> conflict. Like for example: >> >>

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200): > >> So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil >> than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile? >> >> Interesting PoV. > > We're talking about 4.x. It's o

Re: conflict check for upcoming merge

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Here is the output of the script from another machine. Lots of > qmake/qt conflicts, it seems: FWIW, I ran this on my 6-stable box that still has the LOCAL/X11 split (list of ports attached), and got similar results. The qt stuff should be fairly easily solved, so that isn'

Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/bwi-firmware-kmod Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist

Scot Hetzel wrote: > This shouldn't be flaged as an mtree error. The reason that > linker.hints was left behind is due to this file is generated by > kldxref. The port/package runs kldxref during the install of the > firmware module to update the existing or create a linker.hints file, > and when

Re: portmaster vs openoffice.org-3 (dmake)

Andriy Gapon wrote: > I am not exactly sure what's going on, but I see that dmake crashes with > SIGBUS > during editors/openoffice.org-3 (version 3.1.0) build when executed via > portmaster. > Simple make of the port doesn't trigger the problem. > > I examined dmake core file with gdb and it se

Re: portmaster vs openoffice.org-3 (dmake)

Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/05/2009 14:59 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> In any case, it must be a bug in dmake code. > > BTW, I can reliably reproduce this on amd64, but can not do it in i386 jail. > Ports tree is exactly the same, ditto for portmaster version. Ok, that sounds like a dmake

Re: portmaster overzealous on distfiles?

On Tue, 26 May 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 26/05/2009 19:31 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> I run the following command to upgrade from audacious 1.5.* to >> 2.0.*: $ portmaster audacious\* FYI, the \* at the end of that is not necessary. If the command line argument doesn't match a specif

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4

Vlad GALU wrote: > As a side note, loading vboxdrv.ko while X was running crashed my > machine, in RTMpGetOnlineCount (). Unfortunately, all frames between > that and frame 0 were corrupt. After rebooting, I was able to log on > ttyv0 and loaded it without any issues. Regarding my previous message

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8?

Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 20:49:50 +0100 Steven Hartland wrote: > >> Why does emulators/linux_base-f10 contain a Fedora 8 port >> most confusing! > > It was just a repocopy. I'm working on it, just enotime now. Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad t

Re: [CFT] FreeBSD python25 move to python26 as default version.

Kelly Hays wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: >>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the >>methods above, it is required to run the upgrade-site-packages target in >>lang/python to assure that site-packages are made available to

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4

Martin Wilke wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_5.tgz On a newly up to date -current (r192914) with world and kernel in synch and ports up to date I get the same panic when trying to kldload vboxdrv. This is on a C2D running i386 SMP. panic: boot: not running on cpu0 cupid =

Re: [CFT] FreeBSD python25 move to python26 as default version.

Wesley Shields wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Kelly Hays wrote: >>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: >>>>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the >>>>

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4

Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I see those options in the Makefile under a .if for > WITH_GUESTADDITIONS - however I don't think that variable is set > properly. A quick glance at the Makefile indicates that the test for that knob needs to be moved down below the pre- inclusion of bsd.port.mk. Portlin

Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8?

Mark Linimon wrote: Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad thing. :) >>> s/BROKEN/IGNORE/ >> Just wonder, can/should it be implemented automagically via >> the repocopy script? > > I have no opinion, but will note that as long as you don't connect > the ports to the

Re: Port of "service" command

Edwin Shao wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if there was a port of the Linux/UNIX service > , > command? If not, is there any > philosophical reason or roadblock to my creating one? I think you'd need to answer the qu

Re: Port of "service" command

Doug Barton wrote: > Edwin Shao wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering if there was a port of the Linux/UNIX service >> <http://www.manpagez.com/man/8/service/>, >> <http://linux.die.net/man/8/service> command? If not, is there any >> philosoph

Re: Port of "service" command

Kevin Downey wrote: > I have a similar shell function I am rather fond of: > > rc(){ > find /etc/rc.d/"$1" /usr/local/etc/rc.d/"$1" -exec sudo {} `echo > "$*"|cut -f 2- -d \ ` \; > } Wow, that's painful. :) The only reason you don't notice how painful is because those two directories have onl

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

Scott Bennett wrote: > I got no responses when I posted this a few days ago, so I'm reposting > it now. I'd really like to finish the perl upgrade process, so I could move > on to installing/updating other ports safely, but could use some advice. >-

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

Jim Trigg wrote: > Actually, he was suggesting changing from perl\* to perl-\* so it would > only match the perl port. FYI, the \* at the end is not needed, 'portmaster perl-' will work just fine. > Unfortunately, that won't work as there is at > least one other port that will match that -- net/

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > I would like to propose a new ports category, i18n, it would become the new > home, physical or virtual, for ports that are i18n or l10n based. > > While researching the topic, I found the two terms, i18n and l10n, are often > used interchangeably, and while either word c

Re: Removed port OPTIONS linger in /var/db/ports/.../options

Nick Withers wrote: > Hello all! > > I was surprised to see, when trying to update lang/ruby18 today, that > the to-be-installed package would be named "ruby > +nopthreads-1.8.7.160_3,1", rather than the expected > "ruby-1.8.7.160_3,1". > > Checked out the port's Makefile, and indeed this name is

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > To have localization, you need internationalization, so from this, I stand by > my original proposal of i18n. I have no objection to your reasoning, but continue to object to the specific string. If you're going to go down this road then "internationalization" would be th

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

Scott Bennett wrote: > Thank you for doing that. Unfortunately, it might have been more > appropriate to have simply replaced that note with another that cautions > anyone attempting the perl upgrade that the upgrade has not been fully > tested against all ports that may list the new perl as

Re: thank you for portmaster

Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey > > Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster. > After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on > IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the > great work! Thank you for the kind words, they are greatly

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

Scott Bennett wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton > wrote: > There ought to be an automated way to deal with the package issue that > causes the failure of the entire update run just because it wants a human > to type "make deinstall &&am

Re: portsclean deletes necessary distfiles

You might want to try 'portmaster --clean-distfiles' for this purpose. It parses the distinfo files from each installed port to generate the list of current distfiles so there is no chance of deleting something that you need. It's also quite fast. hope this helps, Doug -- This .signature

Excluding multiple ports with -x (Was: Re: portmaster -x not working?)

Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Hijacking the thread slightly, Generally better to start a new one, FYI. > but is there a way to exclude multiple > ports using the -x switch Not at this time, you'll want to use the -i option. hth, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@

Re: portmaster -x not working?

Try using just this: portmaster -x mysql-client- phpMyAdmin-3.1.5 That should work. If it does not, please let me know. Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: unable to make package for php-5.2.10

Anton - Valqk wrote: > works now, but now the libiconv breaks with missing mans... > there is something wrong in whole thing... You need to report these problems to the maintainers of the affected ports. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection _

Re: graphics/jpeg especially UPDATING

Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > If you pkg_delete -r that will remove every package that depends on jpeg. > This is not the right way of just getting rid of jpeg considering it involves > the complete almost full re-installation of the entire system manually. > > A better route to upgrade would be:

Re: graphics/jpeg especially UPDATING

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Mel Flynn wrote: Unfortunately, that can lead to problems as well. I don't have the precise error anymore, but it is possible for programs to be linked to two different libjpeg's and fail the assertion that (paraphrased) "foo wants JPEG_70 API yet JPEG_62 API available". This

Re: updating to ghostscript8-8.64_2 fails

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Scott Bennett wrote: I finally got around it by putting a +IGNOREME file into /var/db/pkg/ghostscript8-8.64_2/ after the following attempts to skip it using the -x option for portmaster failed to do that. portmaster -x print/ghostscript8 -v -w -a portmas

Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

Mel Flynn wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:24:27 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > >> make: don't know how to make >> /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build_done.bind96._usr_local. Stop >> *** Error code 2 > >> Someone else had the same problem, and they also chose overwrite-base: >> >> http://uni

Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> I believe Mel is right here. 'make clean ; make config ; make' worked >> for me. > > As does a second make after getting this error, but it's nonintuitive, > and probably a ports bug. I'm not sure why 'make clean' is nonintuitive in the context of changing OPT

[Fwd: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns/bind94 Makefile distinfo ports/dns/bind95 Makefile distinfo ports/dns/bind96 Makefile distinfo]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > FYI, The checksums in the bind94 distinfo file seem to be wrong. > > /usr/ports/dns/bind94 > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bind-9.4.3-P3.tar.gz.asc. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bind-9.4.3-P3.tar.gz.asc. They created new signature files w

Re: this time it's vim/distfiles

Scott Bennett wrote: > When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the > checksums of 239 (?) patches. To be a little more accurate, the ports infrastructure is doing the verification. Portmaster just calls 'make checksum'. > I looked in distfiles and found that the l

Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

Mel Flynn wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:57:05 Doug Barton wrote: >> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >>>> I believe Mel is right here. 'make clean ; make config ; make' worked >>>> for me. >>> As does a second make after getting this er

Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > The fact that the error occurs AT ALL is the bug and what is > counterintuitive, and many people would not think to try typing "make" > again, and instead would just assume the thing's broken. Ok, I actually misunderstood the problem that you were reporting. I th

Re: after update - not all jpeg files are displayable

Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Oliver Lehmann wrote: >> ajtiM wrote: >> >>> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=585987 >> sounds good >> @marcus - will this fix be integrated into FreeBSDs gtk port? > > Sure, but it may take me some time. FWIW, I had the bug with gqview as well, and the cinfo-

Re: BIND help

On Jul 29, 2009, at 6:06 PM, "Albert Thiel" wrote: I know you don't support Version 7.0 release since April, but the BIND patch on freebsd.org's main site... will it work? The patch is quite simple, so yes. I tried compiling the 9.4.3-P3 on a 7.0 box and it does compile but will not r

Re: dns/bind96 doesn't register idnkit dependency

Oliver Fromme wrote: > However, pkg_infor -r doesn't list any dependencies. > I compiled bind96 with the IDN option, so it also > compiled and installed dns/idnkit. Mistake on my part that I just fixed. Thanks to danger@ for submitting it. Doug ___ f

Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys"

Garrett Cooper wrote: > Gentoo Linux (I know -- Gentoo + Linux -- we're FreeBSD... blah :P) > has a script called `revdep-rebuild' which goes and runs ldd on all > pieces of software that are installed in portage (ok, substitute ports > here). What I'm driving at is that we can use pkg_info and/or

Re: FreeBSD Port: psi-0.12.1_2 need update to 0.13

Alexey Golodov wrote: > Please, note that psi has been updated to0.13. > Also, if you can, see psi+ (http://code.google.com/p/psi-dev/) and, > probably, good idea to add this to ports. > You might want to take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

FYI, In the future you're likely to get faster results if you send your problem report to the port's maintainer as well as the freebsd-ports@ list. David Southwell wrote: > FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jun 24 00:14:35 UTC 2009 r...@amd64- > builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENER

Re: Getting a lot of - pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring

eculp wrote: > I'm getting a lot of the following messages and have no idea how to find > which package is causing the problem. This is one of those times that opening up the files and having a look for yourself might be a good way to start. :) > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line withou

Re: Error when using 'portupgrade -ay' (and several others) [Second attempt]

[If you reply, please strip off freebsd-stable@, thanks.] Jens Rasmus Liland wrote: > That seems to have have done something more. But I still got some funky > errors after running portmaster -a: > ===>>> The x11/xphelloworld port has been deleted: Xprint application, > deprecated upstream > ===>

Re: recent update causes perl5.10 build failure

Scott Bennett wrote: > An update yesterday or today results in perl5.10's build aborting. When > it failed under portmaster, the messages from several processes were too > jumbled for me to see easily what had happened, so I tried portinstall > instead. If you get a non-obvious port build f

Re: Don't know how to make /usr/ports/dns/bind96/work/.build....

Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >>> The fact that the error occurs AT ALL is the bug and what is >>> counterintuitive, and many people would not think to try typing "make" >

Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it?

Scott Bennett wrote: > I see that /usr/ports/UPDATING describes an upgrade of devel/libtool15 > and devel/libtldl15 to devel/libtool22 and devel/libtldl22, respectively. > Is this a good enough thing to do to justify the probable misery and risk > of disaster that would be necessary to get thr

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

Diego Depaoli wrote: > There are too many ports and too few people who care them. > IMHO the options are: > - decrease the number of ports We trim dead/useless ports all the time. > - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers... This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. > - switch

Re: recent update causes perl5.10 build failure

Scott Bennett wrote: > Keep in mind that this experience did appear to reveal a portmaster bug. > After the "portmaster -w -v -a" had already asked whether to rebuild perl5.8 > even though it had a +IGNOREME file and had gotten an enter key in response, > which should have selected the "n" sh

Re: Compile error mail/alpine

David Southwell wrote: > I have tried with: > WITH_THREADS=true > WITH_MOUSE=true > WITHOUT_NLS=true > WITHOUT_ISPELL=true > WITHOUT_NOSPELL=true > WITH_PICO=true > WITH_IPV6=true > WITH_LDAP=true > WITHOUT_PASSFILE=true > WITH_CONS25=true > WITHOUT_QUOTA=true > WITH_MAILDIR=true > > AND > WITHOU

Re: Getting a lot of - pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring

eculp wrote: > I rebuilt the packages and all is well. Glad to hear that it worked out for you. :) > Thanks again for the explanation, the script and especially for > Postmaster that I have been using almost exclusively since the first > version and has been improving .with each subsequent relea

Re: x11-toolkits/xview (actually contool)

Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tom Uffner wrote: >> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: >> >>> Can't xconsole do the job for you instead of contool? >> more or less. i am using xconsole by default. however i prefer contool >> because it has the following features which

Re: devel/dbus-qt4 won't build

Lars Eighner wrote: > Okay after it didn't work a few times I did > > portupgrade -fr qt4\* > > and still the make of devel/dbus-qt4 fails thus: What happens if you do this: cd /usr/ports/devel/dbus-qt4 make clean make config make Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection

Re: getting bogged down by malfunctioning ports subsystem

Scott Bennett wrote: > Yesterday's ports updates are just *loads* of fun. :-( Until portmaster > reached the rebuilding of perl5.10, *every* *single* *port* that got rebuilt > ended in failure on a "make deinstall/make reinstall" recommendation, *none* > of which actually worked when tried.

Re: devel/dbus-qt4 won't build

Naram Qashat wrote: > Actually, I had this problem as well, I found the solution (after a bit > of Googling), is to deinstall devel/dbus-qt4 and then install it again. > Apparently the update conflicts with the older version already installed. Oy, that's not a good thing. I notice that there is

Re: x11-toolkits/xview (actually contool)

Tom Uffner wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> I thought contool looked interesting so I tried build it. It requires >> xview, which fails as follows on a fairly recent -current (8.0-BETA2 >> r195917: Mon Jul 27 16:09:24 PDT 2009): > > i posted an ugly workaround for this a

Re: x11-toolkits/xview (actually contool)

Ok, so now I'm up to the point where starting contool give me this: contool Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file xcb_io.c, line 378. Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) gdb log attached -- This .signature sanitized for your protection $ gdb /usr/local/bin/contool contool.

Re: devel/glib install is not correct.

khsing wrote: > I have found the reason. because libtool15 have been mv to libtool22. > > so upgrade libtool from 15 to 22 will resolve this problem. > > portmaster -Btuw libtool Please check ports/UPDATING for the correct procedure. Of the flags you suggested, -t and -u are meaningless in this

devel/qt4-designer fails on -current

All the other qt4 stuff updated just fine, this one doesn't (and I already disabled make-jobs). Doug c++ -c -pipe -g -g -O2 -Wall -W -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SCRIPT_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/local/share/qt4

Re: [kde-freebsd] devel/qt4-designer fails on -current

Kent Stewart wrote: > I had the same problem. It was fixed in a later update. You need to cvsup > again or what ever you use. I already have the latest version. > You may hit problem with phonon, which the current UPDATING tells you to > delete. Using portupgrade, kdepim was updated after kde

Re: getting bogged down by malfunctioning ports subsystem

Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.08.2009, 05:38 Uhr, schrieb Doug Barton : > > >> I have considered changing the order of how portmaster does things from: >> >> build >> backup package (unless -B) >> deinstall >> install >> >> to: >>

Re: devel/dbus-qt4 won't build

Lars Eighner wrote: > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Naram Qashat wrote: >> >>> Actually, I had this problem as well, I found the solution (after a bit >>> of Googling), is to deinstall devel/dbus-qt4 and then install it again. >>> A

Re: devel/qt4-designer fails on -current

Doug Barton wrote: > All the other qt4 stuff updated just fine, this one doesn't (and I > already disabled make-jobs). Well I'm a bit embarrassed. :-/ I just re-read the UPDATING entry on qt4 stuff and it turns out that this issue is mentioned. Deleting the port first and th

Re: Ports completely and permanently hosed

Lars Eighner wrote: > Believe me, if I can get back to my printer, camera, and mp3 player > all working (which last occurred about 6.2 or so) I'll never upgrade > again. Of course it is kind of lonely when your release is orphaned, > which happens in the blink of an eye, but if the kernel support

enigmail error on -current

I've got an up to date -current, and up to date thunderbird, and tried updating enigmail today and got this: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ~/.thunderbird/a.default/extensions/{847b3a00-7ab1-11d4-8f02-006008948af5}/platform/FreeBSD_x86-gcc3/components/libenigmime-x86-gcc3.so: Undefined symbol "_ZN14nsAutoL

Re: portmaster -x not working?

Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Today, I again had need of the ability to exclude multiple ports from an > update run. It turns out your tip doesn't work with portmaster, though I > suspect it would with portupgrade. For now, if you need to exclude more than one port you can check the man page about +I

Re: portmaster -x not working?

Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Ok cool. I would definitely like to be able to specify things > dynamically on a per-run basis as well though without adding +IGNOREME > files. I often want to special case the exclusion of ports one time only. I agree that it's something that we need to be able to do. I

No sound in linux-flashplugin-9.0r246 on -current

I vaguely recall seeing something about this, but don't recall if there was a resolution. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: No sound in linux-flashplugin-9.0r246 on -current

Juergen Lock wrote: > In article <4a7dd122.10...@freebsd.org> you write: >> I vaguely recall seeing something about this, but don't recall if >> there was a resolution. > > Well head defaults to f10 linux base now I've been using that for a while even before it became the default. > Btw, any pa

Re: No sound in linux-flashplugin-9.0r246 on -current

Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > Is this something that could be handled through libmap.conf rather > than adding an extraneous symlink to that may stick around after > package deletion ? Erroneous libmap.conf entries are just as likely to stick around. :) You must have missed the part of the thread

Re: [HEADSUP]: Ports freeze schedule for 8.0-RELEASE

Erwin Lansing wrote: > Below is the tentative schedule for the ports freeze in preparation for > 8.0-RELEASE. If any major delays occur in the overall release schedule, > the dates may be postponed, but please start preparing to have your > changed committed to the tree before August 17 to ensure

Re: graphics/netpbm & netpbm-devel

cc'ing the maintainer since this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Doug Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > graphics/netpbm & netpbm-devel: > > These two ports dont list and CONFLICTS for either one of them. They do on > the other hand list a conflict with "mgetty ???". Why don't these list >

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

N.J. Mann wrote: > Some years ago I tried using portupgrade, but had all sorts of problems > with its database getting corrupted. In desparation I tried portmaster > and have been a very happy since. (Thanks Doug!). Well I don't know about the desperation part, but you're welcome in any case. :

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

Thomas Backman wrote: > First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I > won't see your answers! :) > > Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: > 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update > > So, long story short: > > [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF > ---> Checking the package registry

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

Thomas Backman wrote: > Thanks, guys! > However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about > portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this > is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail). > > [r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]# portsnap -I fet

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local > and youll be informed of packages that need updating. Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette: 1. Read the whol

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >