RE: lang/gcc6-aux fails to build

> On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:07 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, lang/gcc6-aux is failing to build at r471064 with: > > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# pwd > /usr/ports/lang/gcc6-aux > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# svnlite info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports > URL: https:

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode >I know my friends are running it on Ubuntu but I didn't found any >references how to run it on FreeBSD desktop. > >Miroslav Lachman Yo

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:05:21 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/06/04 17:41: >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >> >>> Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >>> https://github.com/Micro

Re: Of Git and M$

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:37:39 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated: >On Sat, 16 Jun 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote: > >> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase >> of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the >> shots...[*] The only good thing that

poudriere and forcing depends

I have come across several ports that poudriere builds with the wrong dependencies. I have MySQL 8.0 installed by poudriere. I wanted to install "databases/mysqlbackup" When built using the system "make install" command, it works fine. However, when I attempt to build it with poudriere, poudriere

Moving to php-7.2 default

Unless I am mistaken, the default version of PHP in FreeBSD is "version 7.1". According to the PHP page, the 7.1 version was released on December 1, 2016, Its EOL is scheduled for December 1, 2018 (this year) and security support ends on December 1, 2019. Wouldn't it be a wise decision to up the d

orphaned: www/suphp

I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" which produced this: suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp There is nothing about this in either the UPDATING or MOVED files. Has this port actually been removed and if so, why? -- Carmel __

Re: orphaned: www/suphp

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 19:31:52 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 20/10/2018 16:28, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: >>> I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" >>> which produced this: >>> >>> suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp >>> >>> There is nothing a

dovecot-libsodium-plugin

I notice that there is no port for the "dovecot-libsodium-plugin"; "https://github.com/LuckyFellow/dovecot-libsodium-plugin/";. I was wondering if anyone had an interest in creating one? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >Hi, > >I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled: >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \ > --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \ > --without-shadow \ > --without-sodium \ > >by disabling

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:47:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:44 AM Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:16AM +, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >> > >&

Updating "mysql80-server" port

My daily security run summary includes the following: Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities: Database fetched: Sun Dec 9 03:18:49 EST 2018 mysql80-server-8.0.12_2 This has been included in the report for quite some time now. After doing some quick checking, I find that MySQL 8.0.13

Updating poudriere jail

I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, if I do update, will I have to rebuild all of my installed applications? Thanks :) -- Carmel ___ freebsd

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:49:07 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Carmel NY wrote: >> >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, >

Updating perl

Using poudriere, I attempted to update my system to the new "perl 5.28". I made the necessary changes in the "make.conf" files and then attempted to run poudriere. At the very beginning of the run, poudriere issued a warning that "security/py-certbot | py36-certbot-0.29.1_1,1" failed. This is from

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:29:18 +1100, andrew clarke stated: >On Thu 2018-12-13 19:43:30 UTC+0000, Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com) wrote: > >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the po

Building devel/llvm60 on FreeBSD 12.0

Has anyone, besides me of course, had a problem building "devel/llvm60" after updating to FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE? My build, using poudriere, keeps ending with this error message: c++: error: unable to execute command: Killed c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see inv

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Hi, > >after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to >compile: > > configure: error: Cannot find libmilter > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to y.

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Michael Grimm wrote: > >> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by >> configure (see error message above) unless you tellclamav-libmilter'

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:23:39 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >>> Michael Grimm wrote: > >>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >>

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:31:27 +0200, Oleg V. Nauman stated: >On Sunday, January 6, 2019 9:58:29 PM EET Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> New depence? >> >> checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local... found >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lcrypto... no >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lk5c

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:40:01 -0800, Steve Kargl stated: >On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 08:31:12AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: >> Moin moin >> >> Make sure all your qt5-(qt5-gui dependency)-ports that are already >> installed are at 5.12.0. >> > >They are all up to date. > >% cd /usr/ports >% svn

Updating Postfix

Both Postfix 3.4 stable release and Postfix 3.5 experimental release were released over a month ago. In fact, the stable release is now at Postfix 3.4.4. The posts system still has postfix-3.3.3,1 as the stable release and Postfix-3.4.20181202,5 as the development release. I am just inquiring to

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis stated: >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:18:50PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch. > >You sure about that Dima? Whether one or several the patching doesn't >ap

Updating Samba

The 20190619 entry in "UPDATING" recommends certain actions for updating Samba4[6-8] utilizing either 'portmaster' or 'portupgrade'. Are there4 any special actions that have to be taken if utilizing 'poudriere'? Thanks! -- Carmel NY _

Switching to openssl111

FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 GENERIC amd64 openssl version: OpenSSL 1.0.2s 28 May 2019 I want to use openssl111 so I can take advantage of 'tls 1.3' with postfix and apache24. I am trying to determine the correct procedure to use. I am using poudriere to build my packages and then install them. 1) M

Possible Patch

Is it possible for some committer to look at this. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205971&action=edit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: PHP version retirement

On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >Hi all, > >At least the last two versions of PHP, 5.6 & 7.0, were removed from >ports as soon as (or even shortly before) they were no longer actively >maintained upstream. I am unsure what the exact reasoning behind this >was, but I d

Re: Status of samba ports

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:55:00 -0400, Robert Huff stated: >Andrea Venturoli writes: > >> Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit >> from some guidance: >> _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a >> waste of time? >> _ should we stay on 4.8, beca

Web Service Discovery host daemon

I am considering installing "wsdd" . I have not been able to find a port for it. I just want to confirm that there isn't a port available for this program before I go about installing it from source. Thanks! -- Carmel ___

Updating Samba

The latest stable release of Samba is "4.11.2". The newest port version is "4.10.10". Are there plans to update Samba to the latest stable release or is there a specific reason that it cannot be done at this time? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

"math/openblas" will not build under poudriere

Attempting to build "math/openblas" using poudriere results in this error message: Ignoring: has to be built manually: Optimizes for the build machine. I can build it manually, however. Is this a bug or a design feature? The complete log of the failed poudriere build follows. build started at Wed

"devel/kio-extras" with samba v4-10

I have Samba Version 4.10.10 installed. When attempting to build devel/kio-extras with the: SAMBA=on: Needed to build the SMB kioslave which is the default setting in the port, the build fails with the message that the wrong version of 'samba' is installed. Version 4.8 of samba is already EOL'd

Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions >> > on exFAT[1]. >> > >> > Can the Makefil

Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY >wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >> >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >> >wrote: >> >> &

Build with "DEBUG" symbols

Hypothetically, suppose I wanted to build my entire ports system with "debug" symbols; would putting: WITH_DEBUG_PORTS=* in the "make.conf" file work? Asking for a friend. -- Carmel pgp8Qwk11g7Dn.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 Output of smartctl -V smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org smartctl comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistri

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400 >Carmel NY wrote: > >> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 >> >> Output of smartctl -V >> >> smartctl 7.1 2019-12

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:00:35 -0400, Dan McGrath stated: >Hi, > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM Bob Eager wrote: > >> The port doesn't get updated every time there is a new drive >> database; that would be unworkable. >> > >Just a thought, but perhaps something similar to what ntp does with: >

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >Hi, > >I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in >/usr/local/lib. But whatever I try, en en op with cryptostuff from >/usr/lib > >I think the correct way is to set >etc/make.conf >     DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openss

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in >>

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Fri, 29 May 2020 11:38:44 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >Right that helped > >root@test:/tmp/usr/local/lib/dovecot # ldd ./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0 >./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0: >     libdovecot.so.0 => not found (0) >     libssl.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.11 (0x80068300

Mailman 3

I was just wondering if there is a specific reason that Mailman 3 is not in the ports system. The latest update, Mailman 3.3.1 (Tom Sawyer) was released on April 19, 2020. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/ma

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939

Would it be possible for some committer to look at the following PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939 It has been hanging around for over a month. Until it is committed, any serious work on updating and reorganizing 'claws-mail' is effectively halted. Thanks! -- Carmel

net/qt5-network

FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE With a freshly updated ports tree, when I attempt to run poudriere to update the installed ports, I am greeted with this warning: [00:00:21] Ignoring net/qt5-network | qt5-network-5.15.0: is marked as broken: Qt5 requires Openssl 1.1.1, upgrade to FreeBSD 12.x/13.x or add D

Re: net/qt5-network

>On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY wrote: >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> With a freshly updated ports tree, when I attempt to run poudriere to >> update the installed ports, I am greeted with this warning: >> >> [00:00:21] Ignoring net/qt5-

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:30:52 +0400, Gleb Popov stated: >On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:28 PM Carmel NY wrote: > >> >On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> >> >> With a freshly

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:44:21 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder stated: >## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com): > >> The entire build log, what there is of it, is available here: >> https://seibercom.net/logs/qt5-network_build.log > >And there's your problem: >:

portsnap depreciation

Perhaps I am wrong on this, so I thought I would ask. Is 'portsnap' going to be depreciated? If so, when? If is is depreciated, how will this affect poudriere? I thought that poudriere used 'portsnap'. -- Carmel pgpu4e_OrLlmR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: >> Is 'portsnap' >> going to be depreciated? > >Yes. > >> If so, when? > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent >

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:44:27 -0700, John Kennedy stated: >On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >> >> See >> >> https://www.fre

Availability of samba 4.12.x

I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? -- Carmel pgpiWwsjtZK9p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Availability of samba 4.12.x

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:11:50 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba >> 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? > >Because the maintainer did not yet got the time to create a port. You know that for a fact, or is that simply a

[phpLDAPadmin] Fatal error: Uncaught Exception: Serialization of 'Closure'

FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE-p4 php74 I have been have a problem with 'phpLDAPadmin'. It has become impossible to use. I requested help, and was given this URL: https://github.com/leenooks/phpLDAPadmin/issues/103 According to this site, this bug has been squashed.

Re: www/joomla3 is no longer in the FreeBSD pkg repo

On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 01:10:42 -0500, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports stated: >According to the poudriere build cluster >(), joomla3 is being skipped for >reason "php74-pecl-pdflib-4.1.4_1". Can the problem be corrected? I have not used Joomla in awhile. I found it eas

Re: Sudden trouble with net/rdesktop

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:13:57 +0300, abi via freebsd-ports stated: >I have the same problem, however I'm sure that nothing has changed on >remote side (Windows Update is completely disabled). I updated my >FreeBSD workstation though to 12.2 and all ports. Exactly what goal do you intend to achiev

Re: Fresh Ports: citrix_ica Citrix(R) Presentation Server(TM) client

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:51:05 +0100, Emanuel Haupt stated: >Hi Michael > >Michael Hooten wrote: >> https://www.freshports.org/net/citrix_ica/ >> >> Has anyone gotten Citrix completely working on FreeBSD 12.2? I can >> connect without a problem. However, I have no sound. Where can I look >> for doc

Unable to build webkit-gtk2 after updating ICU

While updating ICU as suggested in UPDATING, the "webkit-gtk2" port failed to build. I have tried several times, including making sure all other ports were updated. I then removed the port and tried again. It still failed. I even tried "webkit-gtk3"; however, that failed also. It fails with this m

Re: Unable to build webkit-gtk2 after updating ICU

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:07:20 -0700, David Wolfskill stated: >I'm no "expert" on Gnome-related things, but (especially since you had >tried earlier), you might want to re-try the "make" attempt using "make >clean install" -- within script(1), as you did, as that's almost always >a Good Idea. > >Pea

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

On Wed, 13 May 2015 01:24:35 +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt stated: [Truncated] The most reliable method to eliminate this, for lack of a better word "bullshit", would be for FreeBSD to keep the "base" system "openssl" version" up-to-date. It is apparent to even the most casual observer that the present

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

On Wed, 13 May 2015 07:41:55 -0400, Ernie Luzar stated: >I am having the same problem. Many things missing from the base openssl >that are in the port openssl. >Installing the port version only complicates things by not knowing which >directory structure is really in play. >My suggestion is just

Re: Error message when refreshing keys

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:56:01 +0200, Dr. Peter Voigt stated: >I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and have installed latest gpg 2.0.27 >from ports. When issuing > ># gpg --refresh-keys > >operation seems to work but I am getting following error messages at >the end: > >... >gpg: keyserver communications e

Re: cups, and hplip too, fail to recognize printer when I try to print

The problem has nothing to do with proprietary drivers, etcetera but rather the extremely fractured system of printing on non MS Windows based systems. I have had extensive conversations with representatives from Brother and while they do include PPD's and other assorted files for some of their pri

Re: Problem building maildrop with exim as MTA

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 23:59:29 -0400, Jim Trigg stated: >Any suggestions as to how to fix this? I'm attempting to migrate from >one host running Postfix to a new host running Exim but want to continue >my maildrop support. (The switch is an attempt to reduce backscatter by >doing more antispam du

Re: Problem building maildrop with exim as MTA

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:07:20 -0400, Jim Trigg stated: >I'm not. I'm accepting mail for the request interface of the mailing >lists I host, and the return addresses are forged so the automated >replies can't go through. This doesn't sound right, and I use Postfix. Check out:

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: >The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before >/usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for commands like ssh to point to >the ports version. These methods aren't quite as clean though. Swapping the PATH can, in a few inst

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:48:04 +0200, Michelle Sullivan stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: >> >>> The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before >>> /usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an alias for comma

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory [11 Jun 2015]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:48:04 +0200, Michelle Sullivan stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:36:44 +0100, Matt Smith stated: >> >> >>> The other alternatives are as you say, put /usr/local/bin before >>> /usr/bin in the $PATH. Or add an

Update "cairomm" and "cairo" ports

Does anyone know if the "cairomm" and "cairo" ports are going to be updated? There are newer versions available. The cairo 1.14.2 (10-Mar-2015) release is available; as well as cairomm 1.11.2 (11-Feb-2014). Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.o

Re: ftp/curl needs better config error message please

On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 01:34:57 +0100, Joe Holden stated: >Not sure if I am missing something here - just set GSSAPI_NONE for the >port and it just works (tm) It would work a lot better if this insanity were corrected and it was fully compatible with the ports version of ssl. Rather than correcting

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +, Brooks Davis stated: >We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of >turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "build >everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to >adding a

Swat2

I understand that there is a "swat2" available for Samba4*. I have not seen it in the ports system thought. Is it available for FreeBSD? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SWAT2 -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

"tlmgr" on FreeBSD

Has anyone gotten the "tlmgr" program for maintaining texlive packages, etcetera to run on FreeBSD? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-po

Re: "tlmgr" on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:41:08 -0700, Russell L. Carter stated: >Works just fine for me from the texlive 2015 download (and previous as >well). I don't use ports to maintain my latex packages though. Obviously, that is the reason, although I fail to see why it has been disabled in the port version

Re: "tlmgr" on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:03:56 +0200, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven stated: >Carmel NY wrote: > >> although I fail to see why it has been disabled in the port version. > >As stated previously (although on freebsd-tex@ instead of freebsd-ports@) >it hasn't been disabled,

Re: "tlmgr" on FreeBSD

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:08:50 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> Yes, I know, and it is installed. This is the error message: >> >> cannot setup TLPDB in /usr at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 5611. > >This: > >http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/137428/tlmgr-cannot-setup-tlpdb > >says: > >tlmgr i

Python default versions

Unless I am mistaken, the default version of "python" on FreeBSD is "2.7" The default version for the "meta-port" for version 3 of the Python interpreter is "3.4" I was just wondering if there is any serious consideration to at least changing the FreeBSD default version to "3.x". Python 3.0 was re

Import MySQL 5.7.9 into ports

Unless I am mistaken, MySQL 5.7.9 in not in the ports system. Are there any plans to add this to the ports tree? There appears to be a tarball for FreeBSD listed. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma

Re: Import MySQL 5.7.9 into ports

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:08:48 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: >> Unless I am mistaken, MySQL 5.7.9 >> in not in the ports system. >> Are there any plans to add this to the ports tree? There appears to be a >> tarball for FreeBSD listed. > >There's work b

Update "net-p2p/btsync"

Is it possible to update the "/usr/ports/net-p2p/btsync" port? It is now at version 2.2.7 as currently listed on: https://www.getsync.com/platforms/desktop Thanks! -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/

update PHP

I am running a FreeBSD 10.2 - p7 machine. I have PHP 5.4 installed . I want to update it to version 5.6. Would this method work: portupgrade -o lang/php56 lang/php5 Then: portupgrade -o lang/php56-extensions lang/php5-extensions Would I l then need to rebuild everything that depends on PHP or c

Re: update PHP

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:21:10 +0100, Miroslav Lachman stated: >pkg query %o `pkg info -r php55 | tail -n +2` | sed 's~php5~php56~' > >my_php_ports That list 1154 ports. pkg query %o `pkg info -r php5 | tail -n +2` results in 22 ports. print/pecl-pdflib www/pecl-APC www/php5-session textproc/php

Updating php

FreeBSD-10.2 I just updated php5 (5.4) to php56. I now have two programsthat will not run. "net/phpldapadmin" and "databases/phpmyadmin". When I attempt to access "net/phpldapadmin" via the net, I receive this error message: Notice: Undefined variable: _SESSION in /usr/local/www/phpldapadmin/li

Re: Updating php

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:51:24 +0100, Torsten Zuehlsdorff stated: >Hello, > >> I just updated php5 (5.4) to php56. I now have two programsthat will not >> run. "net/phpldapadmin" and "databases/phpmyadmin". When I attempt to >> access "net/phpldapadmin" via the net, I receive this error message: >

Re: Updating php

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:00:29 +, Matthew Seaman stated: >This is why I generally prefer to use php-fpm nowadays, and access them >from a HTTP server using FCGI. It provides a useful separation of >roles: the web server can handle serving pages as efficiently as >possible and need not know anyt

Re: Call for Help: need script for patching ports tree, building with poudriere

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:30:06 +0100, Torsten Zühlsdorff stated: >I'm sorry Ricky. I tried to contact you already, but hotmail.com blocked >my mailserver. And it is as always surprisingly hard to even find the >removal request form... Why is it being blocked? What was the error code or other infor

Re: Call for Help: need script for patching ports tree, building with poudriere

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:26:05 +0100, Torsten Zuehlsdorff stated: >On 01.12.2015 12:11, Carmel NY wrote: > >>> I'm sorry Ricky. I tried to contact you already, but hotmail.com blocked >>> my mailserver. And it is as always surprisingly hard to even find the >>>

dirmngr-1.1.0_12 conflicts with gnupg-2.1.0_1 (installs files into the same place)

I just updated, or rather tried to update the "gnupg" port. it failed with a message that it conflicts with the "dirmngr" port. I deleted that port and then preceded to install "GNUPG". When I attempted to re-install the "dirmngr" port, it issued this error message: dirmngr-1.1.0_12 conflicts with

Update Postfix-current port.

The current version of the Postfix development available in the ports system is 3.3-20170502; however, the present version available is postfix-3.3-20170611. Is it possible to get the port's version undated? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

clamav-unofficial-sigs

The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are there any plans to update the port? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: clamav-unofficial-sigs

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:49:09 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a >> newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are >> there any plans to update the port? > >Have you tried to provide a patch ? It's structure

"clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

I recently installed clamav-unofficial-sigs via the ports system. The port version is quite old,v5.3.2, while the current version is v5.6.2. In any case, I am receiving the following error message repeatedly: Jun 24 15:45:00 ERROR: clamscan binary (clamscan_bin) not found This is the full log fr

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >determines if there are updates or whether you have checked recently, >so that you do not inadvertently dos the signature servers. What is >NOT working, apparently, is cla

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:37:29 +0200, Marko Njezic stated: >On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >> >>> From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >>> determines if there are up

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:15:13 -0700, Yuri stated: >On 09/03/17 17:54, Geoffrey Huntley wrote: >> Seehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and >> https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 > > >Is there a body of software that requires .Net? I never came across >anything

Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" module. Apache24 complains that it is not present and quits. What port installs that module? I cannot seem to locate it. Thanks :) -- Carmel __

Re: Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:42:31 +0200, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator stated: >On 26-9-2017 15:31, Carmel NY wrote: >> I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up >> and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" module. Apac

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of most desktop applications >> are so complex that the build falls apart if the upgrade tool

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:27:40 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >from Chris H: > >> FWIW I loved portmaster, but quickly found that by choosing it, I was >> *instantly* at odds with a large majority of the FreeBSD crowd. >> Eventually, I experimented with other choices, and finally landed on >> ports-m

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:06:17 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Carmel NY wrote: > >> >> Excuse my ignorance, but why was John Marino exiled? >> >> >Not to state any opinion of my own, but John had his commit bit pulled >after a l

  1   2   >