Re: Create directory for www:www

2016-04-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0300, a...@abinet.ru wrote: > > > Hello! > > I'm porting ZoneMinder, it needs folder, writable under web server user. > > > I wrote in post-install something like this > > ${INSTALL} -d -g ${WWWGRP} -o ${WWWOWN} ${STAGEDIR}${WWWDIR}/images > > I can se

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi — > > This is 10.3-PRERELEASE (r297387). > > I did upgrade ports-mgmt/pkg today and ever since, I do observe a significant > slow-down when it comes to reinstalling ports from my poudriere repository: > > 26 seconds for 74 port

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > […] > >> 309 seconds for the

Re: Need an expect script or p5-*Expect* to lessen keystrokes upon large ports tree changes

2016-04-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:21:03PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports < > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Today svn-of-ports has about 600 (tc,mc) /200 (r) = 800 responses > > required (tree and etc conflicts) > > > > > > -

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/02/2016 15:00: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, Apr 02, 201

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > […] > >> 309 seconds for the

Re: minor(?) problem with pkg crashing

2016-04-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:27:22AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > pkg 1.7.2 crashed at the end of upgrade run, after completing all the > upgrades. > Unfortunately no debug symbols, but it looks like a double free or something > like that, seems that this happens only if > > Conflicts with the exist

Re: minor(?) problem with pkg crashing

2016-04-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:30:08PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 20/04/2016 11:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:27:22AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> pkg 1.7.2 crashed at the end of upgrade run, after completing all the > >> upgrades.

Re: minor(?) problem with pkg crashing

2016-04-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:47:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 20/04/2016 17:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:30:08PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 20/04/2016 11:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:27:

Patch for postfix port approved but not committed

2007-08-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I've made a patch for postfix submitted in pr (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/110678) the 16 April 2007. The maintainer ask it to be committed the 3 august 2007, and it is still not committed, Is there a reason ? Have I done something wrong ? Or is it the normal proc

Re: Re: Patch for postfix port approved but not committed

2007-08-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Yes it has been committed few minutes after I sent my email, I haven't been patient enough :) Quoting Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I've made a patch for postfix submitted in pr (http://www.freeb

Re: pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64

2014-06-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are > known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture: > > root@privoxy-jail / #pkg add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1.txz > Installing ImageMagick-6.

Re: Fw: FYI: devel/libevent can break www/spdylay

2014-06-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 02:03:07PM +0100, Kostas Peletidis via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > Forwarding to freebsd-ports in case someone else finds it useful. > > > On Tuesday, 10 June 2014, 13:35, Kostas Peletidis > wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >The following is a summary of a little

Re: Libreoffice does not builds with parallell make

2014-06-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > It stops with > > >3991 [build ECH] CustomTarget/instsetoo_native/setup/versionrc^M >3992 fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent > directories): .git^M > > > If I set PARALELL=1 > it builds... but

Re: Libreoffice does not builds with parallell make

2014-06-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:58:59PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > Em Qua, 2014-06-11 às 23:25 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > > > It stops with > > > > > >

Re: Keeping my ports tree in sync with the public pkg repo

2014-06-12 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:11:13AM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Is there a way to determine the ports tree revision used for the current > public pkg repo? > Right now you have no way but knowing that we take a snapshot of the ports tree at 1am UTC every wednesday and build on it With pkg 1.3

Re: textproc/libe-book00 and rm -f /usr/local/bin

2014-06-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:13:34AM +0300, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > post-install: > ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/* > > > result: > gmake[7]: Выход из каталога > `/usr/ports/textproc/libe-book00/work/libe-book-0.0.3' > gmake[6]: Выход из каталога > `/usr/ports/textproc/libe-book00/wo

Re: textproc/libe-book00 and rm -f /usr/local/bin

2014-06-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:13:34AM +0300, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > post-install: > ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/* > > > result: > gmake[7]: Выход из каталога > `/usr/ports/textproc/libe-book00/work/libe-book-0.0.3' > gmake[6]: Выход из каталога > `/usr/ports/textproc/libe-book00/wo

Re: What will happen with unstaged ports with pending PRs on June 30th?

2014-06-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:45:53PM +0200, Ivan Rokotov wrote: > 21.06.2014, 15:37, "Kurt Jaeger" : > > Hi! > >>  Only 9 days left until the proposed deadline to add staging support > >>  to all ports. My question is: what will happen that day with unstaged > >>  ports that have submitted staging pa

Re: How can I override global OPTIONS_UNSET for specific port in make.conf? www/xcache

2014-06-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:49:29PM +0200, Marco Steinbach wrote: > Miroslav Lachman schrieb: > > I don't need DOCS, EXAMPLES etc. for each port as I normaly do not use > > them on servers. > > I have this line in make.conf > > > > OPTIONS_UNSET= X11 GUI CUPS DOCS EXAMPLES NLS > > > > Now I need

Re: Ports tree insecure because of IGNOREFILES+IGNORE

2014-06-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:18:44PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Good catch philj, I wasn't aware of this "feature". I'm grepping the > ports that I use as I type my appreciation. Though this makes me wonder > about the efficacy of having a sha signature for the package manifest... > Regards,

Re: Boost 1.55.0 (Was: Re: PowerPC Packages)

2014-06-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: > >> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in > >> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47. > > FAVO

Re: Boost 1.55.0 (Was: Re: PowerPC Packages)

2014-06-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn > wrote: > > On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > &g

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

2014-06-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:22:30AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 05/28/14 10:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:54:03AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread on the SVN >

Re: Boost 1.55.0 (Was: Re: PowerPC Packages)

2014-06-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:03:42PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 06/26/14 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn > >> wrote: > >>

Re: rsync 3.1.1 zlib might not work

2014-06-27 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 02:55:27PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Thanks for your report. I was able to confirm this: This is by design: https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=blob;f=options.c;h=62dfe4f022474ad08b13988fa7fd8875c4cff2b6;hb=HEAD#l1840 regards, Bapt pgpQ86mpol0lk.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Porting LeoFS

2014-06-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:21:42PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Hi, > > Here[1] is my attempt to port LeoFS[2] -- a scalable, fault-tolerant, > S3-API compatible object storage system. > > I am planning to commit it to the port tree eventually. > > Any comments, suggestions for improvement, tes

Re: Porting LeoFS

2014-06-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:44:24PM +, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:40:54PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > + ${CP} -R ${WRKSRC}/* ${STAGEDIR}${DATADIR} > > > > Can be replaced by something using COPYTREE_SHARE > > Thanks. Will do.

[HEADSUP] Ports 2014Q3 branched

2014-07-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
hi all, The 2014Q3 branch has just been branched and the package builder has been updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2014Q3 branch What happen during the last 3 months: - 177 different committers have participated - 9918 commits happen

Re: archivers/rpm build problem

2014-07-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:30:08AM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote: > Hi, > > I've had a problem with archivers/rpm since the last update. It refuses > to build saying > > ===> Building for rpm-3.0.6_17 > cd . && aclocal > aclocal: macro `_LT_DECL_SED' required but not defined > aclocal: macro `_LT_FU

Re: archivers/rpm build problem

2014-07-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering why do > > you > > or other people use rpm for? I am planning to rem

Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st.

2014-07-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Daniel Ryslink wrote: > Hello, > > I was quite seriously ill for some time, and I have only now noticed > these messages. I am the maintainer of the games/gnarr port. > > Please give me one week to update the port according to your > specifications, I w

Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st.

2014-07-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:02:03PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 3/07/2014 3:43 AM, Daniel Ryslink wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was quite seriously ill for some time, and I have only now noticed > > these messages. I am the maintainer of the games/gnarr port. > > > > Please give me one week to

Re: Apache 2.4 must become default NOW

2014-07-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:27:48AM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > On 2014-07-05 19:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > given ports@ ist listed as maintainer, you get the email. The Subject says > > it. The world has moved on; in March I had a hard time arguing, in July I > > just cannot any

Re: please set math/gnuplot PDF=off by default, or resolve texlive vs teTeX

2014-07-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:32:23PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > # make -C /usr/ports/math/gnuplot/ showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for gnuplot-4.6.5_3: > CAIRO=on: Cairo graphics library support > DOCS=on: Build and/or install documentation >

Re: please set math/gnuplot PDF=off by default, or resolve texlive vs teTeX

2014-07-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:27:39PM +0200, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: > [Added CC to freebsd-tex@] > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 07:32:23PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > # make -C /usr/ports/math/gnuplot/ showconfig &

Re: devel/gmake-lite: fails on CURRENT r 268535 to build: @itemx must follow @item

2014-07-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53:10PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #2 r268535: Fri Jul 11 22:09:39 CEST 2014 amd64 the > port > devel/gmake-lite fails to build with the following error, shown below. The > port is > prerequisite and needed for lang/gcc4[89] which has been up

Re: Blender/libicu linking issues

2014-07-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 06:05:29PM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: > Hi, > > When linking Blender 2.71 on fbsd10 I get: > > Linking CXX executable ../../bin/blender > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libicuuc.so.52, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libboost_regex.so, not found (try using -rpath or > -rpath-

Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden?

2014-07-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:45:19PM +0200, René Ladan wrote: > Hi, > > according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not > marked as forbidden. > How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports and > forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inf

Re: rar library dependency error

2014-07-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:46:50PM +0200, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > It seems that rar needs GCC to make go away the following message: > > ===> Installing for rar-5.1.0,3 > ===> Registering installation for rar-5.1.0,3 > pkg-static: (rar-5.1.0,3) > /usr/ports/archivers/rar/work/stage//

[CFT] new libdrm with old xorg

2014-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I need some testers to have one unique libdrm what ever version xorg is used, we know the newer version works properly with newer xorg, I have been testing so far with old xorg and everything seems to work ootb. Can anyone test and tell me if that works? basically before and after the upd

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd > > wrote: > > >>> Hi!

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > 3) The bi

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:57:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > >> > >> >

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:57:44PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box > > 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it > > can't just be installed and not be

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-18 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:10:34PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > > On 18 July 2014 07:28, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > >> > >> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote

Re: Any chances to reduce number of gcc ports/packages which are installed as BINARY PACKAGES dependencies?

2014-07-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Maybe, we should encourage ports, which is needed gcc, to use only one > > version? If many ports needs 4.8, maybe, we should bump "any" version to > > 4.8 for gcc-less systems? And

[ANNOUNCEMENT] pkg 1.3.0 out!

2014-07-23 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0 This version is the result of almost 9 month of hard work Here are the statistics for the version: - 373 files changed, 66973 insertions(+), 38512 deletions(-) - 29 different contributors Please not that for the first time I'm not the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pkg 1.3.0 out!

2014-07-24 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:53:12AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote: > Not to be a buzzkill but, build/patch fails in poudriere and on host: > > ===> Patching for pkg-1.3.0 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for pkg-1.3.0 > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving

Re: Postponing the switch to TeXLive

2014-07-24 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Andrea Venturoli writes: > > > I've read in /usr/ports/UPDATING that TeXLive is now the default. > > Since I've no time to test it now, I'd like to stay with TeTeX for a > > further litte while. > > > > So I put "TEX_DEFAULT=tetex"

Re: Postponing the switch to TeXLive

2014-07-24 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:44:20PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:05:35PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Andrea Venturoli writes: > >> > >>

Re: "pkg upgrade" without using INDEX (pkg-1.3)

2014-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:09:58AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote: > pkg-1.3 apparently uses INDEX to speed things along. I can't use INDEX and > need a way to do "pkg upgrade" the old way because: > > I merge gnome3 and linux_c6 branches into the ports tree. The latest > linux_c6 merge breaks "make inde

Re: tex-format fails build (package)

2014-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:32:14PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:15:09PM +0200 I heard the voice of > > Michelle Sullivan, and lo! it spake thus: > > > >> Thanks, at least eyes are on it... > >> > > > > Well, _my_ eyes can't really

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pkg 1.3.0 out!

2014-07-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 07/24/14 23:56, John Hay wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0 &g

Re: PKG 3.1.0 update - Segmentation fault: 11

2014-07-27 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Bapt, > > I just found another > issue with the port update fail face="Verdana">ure: > > > pkg info > Child process pid=2126 terminated abnormally: Seg

Re: ports with lib_depends: prefering one lib over another

2014-07-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:32:15AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > In > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192123 > > the suggestion is to use graphics/libjpeg-turbo, if possible > and use graphics/jpeg, if not. > > Question: How can this be expressed in the ports Makefile

Re: pkg: pkg create deadlocks and hangs ZFS host

2014-07-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:19:57PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > I had pkg crash[1] our build host a couple of times today. I could > reproduce the issue on a local machine and opened a detailed bug > report on github[2] which links to a gist containing the patch that's > also attached to this ema

Re: Strange pkg_deinstall behaviour with pkgng

2014-07-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:46:40PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 07/28/14 20:28, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I was forced to switch to pkgng on a 9.2 box and I'm now noticing a > > strange behaviour. > > > > Before, "pkg_deinstall -R foo" would deinstall foo and all ports on >

Re: Strange pkg_deinstall behaviour with pkgng

2014-07-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:23:10PM +0200, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:41:18 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:46:40PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > > On 07/28/14 20:28, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > > >

Re: pkg 1.3.3 has a dependency on autoconf to build?

2014-07-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:21:21PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded a FreeBSD-CURRENT VMDK file from > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAGES/11.0-CURRENT/amd64/20140714/ > > and booted it in a brand new VirtualBox VM. > > I then did: > > portsnap fetch > port

Re: pkg 1.3.X changed behaviour with pkg -fR xxx

2014-07-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:45:32PM -0300, sergio lenzi wrote: > see the sequence of commands > > pkg info -qr db6 > results > redland-1.0.17_3 > serf-1.3.6_1 > subversion-1.8.9_7 > apr-1.5.1.1.5.3_3 > squidGuard-1.4_9 > cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.26_1 > evolution-dat

Re: cppunit

2014-07-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:40:13PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ajtim wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Update of ccpunit on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE (amd64) doesn't work: > > > > ===> Installing for cppunit-1.12.1_2 > > ===> Checking if devel/cppunit already installed > >

Re: cppunit

2014-07-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:00:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:40:13PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ajtim wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Update of ccpunit on

Re: Yet another pkg bug?

2014-08-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:53:56PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > On a 10.0/amd64 system: > > > # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING > > ... > > 20140730: > > AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt > > AUTHOR: p...@freebsd.org > > > > libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libr

Re: pkg: cached package size mismatch, cannot continue

2014-08-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:10:54PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 20:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > Fetching automake-1.14.txz: 100% of 431 > > > KB > > > pkg: cached package automake-1.14: size mismatch

Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade and pkg 1.3

2014-08-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 06:03:08PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 05.08.2014 10:57, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > On 07/24/14 23:24, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> portupgrade appears to be a lot slower with the pkg-1.3 when it goes > >> into its clean-up phase. The "pkg which -q ..." tha

Re: How to tell pkg it's OK to overwrite files by another port

2014-08-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:35:03AM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > Hi, > > the issue: > for www/magento there is a sample data package. I'd like to make a port > for it, but the sample data overwrites a few files in the www/magento > port's installed files to match the sample theme. > > This is OK

Re: How to tell pkg it's OK to overwrite files by another port

2014-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 09:19:48PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:35:03AM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> the issue: > >> for w

Re: ports-mgmt/pkg

2014-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:20:18PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > On 08/05/2014 12:23 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > > I tried version pkg-1.3.4 yesterday. When I used pkg install to install > > a preexisting package which had lots of dependencies, I would get lines > > like thi

Re: pkg-devel fails to register any port

2014-08-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:17:05PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Hello, > > since the update to pkg-1.4.0.p.a6 it now fails to register any port > (built with `make install` or portmaster) with the message like: > > """ > ===> Installing for libgcrypt-1.6.1_3 > ===> Checking if security

[HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only

2014-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, marked as broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to stage them are pending in bugzilla). I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work on staging! It allowed us to convert more than

[HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, The ports tree has been modified to only support pkg(8) as package management system for all supported version of FreeBSD. if you were still using pkg_install (pkg_* tools) you will have to upgrade your system. The simplest way is cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg make install then run pkg2n

Re: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only

2014-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:41:34PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:27:00 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, > > marked as broken and will be remove

[BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the directories. I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss before making them official. First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are equivalent. Evolutions: 1/ stop prependi

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:09:33AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/03/14 09:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. > > > > I have been working on some

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. > > > > I have been working on some evolutions

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/03/14 11:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when > > creating > > the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want to delete an

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:07:51 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: >

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. > > Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: &

Re: Python's autoplist and man pages

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:40:08PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > > Hi, > > Did anything change with regard to autoplist and compressed man pages? > > devel/ipython used to work fine, but now man pages are no longer detected > correctly: > > > Compressing man pages (compress-man) > ==

Re: Python's autoplist and man pages

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:46:23PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:40:08PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Did anything change with regard to autoplist and compressed man pages? > > > > devel/ipython used to wor

Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

2014-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: &

First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life)

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 - Ignore mtree in packages - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories wit

Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life)

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Dreamcat4 wrote: > And for the documentation. Porter's handbook, it needs changes? > Yes this will come along thanks for reminding. > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > After the discussion that happened

Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life)

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:21:30PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 05.09.2014 um 10:19 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > > After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do > > If no stong objections ar

Re: package availability

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:49:10AM +0200, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: > > > I'm looking for a package of fftw3-3.3.3_2, built for amd64 with > > default options. > > "pkg search fftw3" reports 3.3.3_1. > > When is 3.3.3_1 likely to become available? > > You prob

Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib12 > and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't > have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both > glib-2.36.3_3 and g

Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20

2014-09-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:36:11AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:34:17AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and p

Re: CONFLICTS_INSTALL and pkg

2014-09-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:35:34PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Hi, > > Do we still need to specify CONFLICTS_INSTALL or does pkg handle that > automatically now? Yes, I think we should drop CONFLICTS_INSTALL because: 1/ pkg handle it automatically 2/ it prevents make package which is now done

Re: shells/bash port, add a knob which symlinks to /bin/bash ?

2014-09-12 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:12:45PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > In the last 3 jobs that I have worked at, there have been > a mix of Linux machines and FreeBSD machines. > When using an NIS or LDAP environment where > there is a single login across multiple machines, it is useful to > h

Re: shells/bash port, add a knob which symlinks to /bin/bash ?

2014-09-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Dreamcat4 wrote: > Right, well here is another one: > > The missing symlink for /etc/ssl/cert.pem > > There is no reason it should not be in > > ${prefix}/etc/ssl/cert.pem > > Except that the folder etc/ssl/ only exists in base. > > Without this symlin

Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available?

2014-09-23 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:02:11AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus > >> ---> Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200 > >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus: > >>

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

2014-09-23 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 08:18:45AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Baptiste, have you had a chance to look at this? I'd like to at least > merge the changes to the bootstrapper in base so that it doesn't seg > fault at start on armeb, but want to make sure the URLs are finalized > before doing

Re: is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-09-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: > > Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 > > These messages originate in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk > > But Mk/bsd.database.mk claims a different

Re: Redports and leftovers calculation

2014-09-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 03:31:04PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/28/2014 7:42 AM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While working on a new port, my builds report leftovers as if I'm > > wiping out /usr/local on package removal: > > > > https://redports.org//~fernape/20140927175500-6

HEADSUP: 10.0 switch to WITH_NEW_XORG

2014-09-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, The WITH_NEW_XORG setting has been activated by default on FreeBSD 10.0 and above, which allows us to have packages for xorg 1.12 and kde4. Please be aware that on systems that only support syscons switching virtual terminals or exiting X results in a black screen or the last image of their d

New 2014Q4 branch

2014-10-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, The 2014Q4 branch has just been branched and the package builder has been updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2014Q4 branch What happen during the last 3 months: - 160 committers have participated - 9557 commits - diffstat says:

Re: HEADSUP: 10.0 switch to WITH_NEW_XORG

2014-10-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:13:53PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The WITH_NEW_XORG setting has been activated by default on FreeBSD 10.0 > > and above, which allows us to hav

Removal of legacy X.Org (aka non-WITH_NEW_XORG)

2014-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, As you may know, the ports tree currently provides two versions of the X.Org server and related pieces of software: 1. xserver 1.7, Mesa 7.6 and libdrm 2.4.17 2. xserver 1.12, Mesa 9.1 and libdrm 2.4.52 We are about to remove the older set. The primary reason is the maintenance cost. Th

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >