Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
blubee blubeeme writes:
> I'm looking at the information for audio/oss and it seems that the source
> used is different than the 4frontversion.
>
> -
>
> This port uses installation procedure that is very different from
> the one used by 4Front and is not supported by them.
>
> -
>
> The
On 02/12/2017 17:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
* Steve Kargl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry no
On 12/03/17 19:26, Thomas Mueller wrote:
from Baho Utot:
I don't use HEAD. I use Quartlery with synth. It is just I expect a little
more than amature hour. I was on Archlinux for 10 years and they are very
bleeding edge. Almost No breakage in ten years. The only reason I left Linux
was sy
On 12/03/17 20:47, Dennis Glatting wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 20:07 +, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> People really seem to miss the point that there are only finite
>> resources
>> and as an open source project that depends on people volunteering
>> their
>> time to add new features and mainta
Thanks for the heads up, I am still learning my way around so I might ask
questions that don't seem to make sense sometimes.
Since there is no maintainer and the FreeBSD OSS is a fork [I'd assume] of
an earlier version, wouldn't it be wise to port over the new OSS 4.xx since
this page: http://manu
I've been reading up on FLAVORS
(https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages)
and creating a plan for FreshPorts.
Since FLAVORS came in, FreshPorts has been reporting false sanity test failures
like this:
https://www.freshports.org/sanity_test_failures.php?message_id=201712041212.vb4cc
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote:
> >
> > > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" :
> > >
> > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
> > > make.conf like this:
>
blubee blubeeme writes:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
>
>> blubee blubeeme writes:
>>
>> > I'm looking at the information for audio/oss and it seems that the source
>> > used is different than the 4frontversion.
>> >
>> > -
>> >
>> > This port uses installation procedur
Dennis Glatting writes:
> 1) I am tired of port breakage. I am past tired of being told to read
> UPDATEs when UPDATEs often has limited information, including install
> conflicts.
>
> 2) "Error 70" on installs with no indication of where the error was
> incurred and thus requiring me to make
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +, Alan Hicks wrote:
>
>
> On 02/12/2017 17:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> >> * Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Given that I asked about a specific revision number, it stands
> > to reason tha
Steve Kargl writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +, Alan Hicks wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 02/12/2017 17:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>> >> * Steve Kargl wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> > Given that I asked about a specific revision n
Jonathan Chen wrote:
Thomas Mueller wrote:
I can still see possible use for portmaster in that something has to
be used to build synth or poudriere from source.
You don't need portmaster for that. You just need make(1).
This is what we do plus a few extras to share the resulting ports across
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 at 03:02, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
> You mean if you're not into security or part of a security company stay
> on quarterly, but if you need to keep patched up because you are in the
> top 100 of most attacked sites/companies in the world, deploy a team of
> people to patch s
Hi,
I'm cross-compiling packages for the raspberry pi using poudriere.
However, as of a few days ago I get a number of errors:
[00:00:10] >> Error: databases/py-pymysql depends on nonexistent origin
'devel/py-setuptools@py27'; Please contact maintainer of the port to fix this.
[00:00:26] ===
Are you using poudriere 3.2?
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
On 12/4/17, 2:48 PM, "Koen Martens" wrote:
Hi,
I'm cross-compiling
Hi,
I've installed poudriere through pkg, which gives me 3.1.22 at the moment. I'll
try 3.2 from ports tomorrow, wasn't aware that the binary packages had an out
of date version. I'll report back on whether that worked or not.
Thanks,
Koen
On 4 December 2017 21:51:51 CET, Larry Rosenman wrot
(Top-posting trimmed...)
Koen Martens writes:
> I've installed poudriere through pkg, which gives me 3.1.22 at the
> moment. I'll try 3.2 from ports tomorrow, wasn't aware that the binary
> packages had an out of date version. I'll report back on whether that
> worked or not.
poudriere 3.2.* ha
On 4 Dec, Koen Martens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed poudriere through pkg, which gives me 3.1.22 at the
> moment. I'll try 3.2 from ports tomorrow, wasn't aware that the binary
> packages had an out of date version. I'll report back on whether that
> worked or not.
The default package reposti
Hello,
It looks like the "gogs" user wasn't fixed back to be "git" like the
other ports: devel/py-gitosis, devel/gitolite, devel/gitolite2,
www/gitlab, and now even www/gitea as it looks like had even been the
intention:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283#c55
As this seems
On 12/3/2017 8:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> Note: /usr/ports/ (and so poudriere-devel) as of -r425204
> (poudriere-devel-3.2.99.20171129).
>
> I expect that the below is from ports-mgmt/poudriere-=devel
> -r454996 and its:
>
> - ports/jail -c NOZFS: Consider non-empty-already-existing-director
By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor?
I am using portmaster.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 12/3/2017 8:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> Note: /usr/ports/ (and so poudriere-devel) as of -r425204
> (poudriere-devel-3.2.99.20171129).
>
> I expect that the below is from ports-mgmt/poudriere-=devel
> -r454996 and its:
>
> - ports/jail -c NOZFS: Consider non-empty-already-existing-director
> On 4 Dec, 2017, at 14:39, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 4 Dec, Koen Martens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've installed poudriere through pkg, which gives me 3.1.22 at the
>> moment. I'll try 3.2 from ports tomorrow, wasn't aware that the binary
>> packages had an out of date version. I'll report back on wh
On 2017-Dec-4, at 3:54 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 12/3/2017 8:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> Note: /usr/ports/ (and so poudriere-devel) as of -r425204
>> (poudriere-devel-3.2.99.20171129).
>>
>> I expect that the below is from ports-mgmt/poudriere-=devel
>> -r454996 and its:
>>
>> - ports/
For me the why is simple.
I want the best possible audio for my system. I work with synthesizers and
audio programs a lot and on Linux for pro audio everyone recommended using
Jack sound server, which was always a pain to maintain, keep connections
between sessions, etc...
After learning more abo
Hi Douglas,
Thanks for pointing that out, I missed your comment in the PR discussion.
I'll update the port to use "git" user though this will probably make it
conflict
with www/gitea (and maybe others you mentioned) because they'll be both
modifying the contents of ~git/.ssh and will have conflict
Hello Dmitri,
Thanks! I'm pretty sure if you had more than of the other things at once
using the git user at same time you'd run into the same issue, but I
don't think that is a really likely situation other than if someone is
migrating between solutions or something.
Douglas William Thrift
On 5/12/2017 10:43 AM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor?
> I am using portmaster.
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, s
On 04/12/2017 21:52, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Unfortunately it appears that we need to build multiple versions of,
> say, python when you only NEED to run 2.7 refer to (1) above? It used
> to be that the ports team recommended when users should update python,
> php, etc and the ports suite would
Steven Hartland wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 at 03:02, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
You mean if you're not into security or part of a security company stay
on quarterly, but if you need to keep patched up because you are in the
top 100 of most attacked sites/companies in the world, deploy a team of
p
Hi all,
I'm looking for a committer to PR #222703 to have postgis24 in ports.
This is necessary for the postgis framework PR #213038.
Thank you.
Regards
Loïc
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino:
> By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor?
> I am using portmaster.
I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build
all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes,
but there is still so
33 matches
Mail list logo