Am 16.05.2017 um 14:00 schrieb Renato Botelho:
> On 16/05/17 08:54, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Hello Mathias,
>>
>> I was trying to get openvpn23 installed from quarterly branch and got
>> the following error:
>>
>> root@buildbot1:/usr/local/poudriere/ports/pfSense_v2_3/security/openvpn23
>> # make c
After the update of devel/py-backports.functools_lru_cache to 1.4 it started to
conflict with devel/py-backports.shutil_get_terminal_size:
py27-backports.functools_lru_cache-1.4 [FreeBSD] conflicts with
py27-backports.shutil_get_terminal_size-1.0.0 [installed] on
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-pac
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hello,
I am hitting an issue where the conflicting www/node6 and www/node
packages are attempting to be installed together. For example, the
upcoming net-im/mastodon pulls in www/yarn (which depends on www/node6
by default), and indirectly depends on devel/rubygem-execjs (which
depends on www/nod
Can execjs work with node6? What else would have to change to get it all
onto node6?
Steve
On 05/18/2017 13:22, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am hitting an issue where the conflicting www/node6 and www/node
> packages are attempting to be installed together. For example, the
> upcoming
> On 18 May, 2017, at 11:22, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am hitting an issue where the conflicting www/node6 and www/node
> packages are attempting to be installed together. For example, the
> upcoming net-im/mastodon pulls in www/yarn (which depends on www/node6
> by default), and
Steve Wills writes:
> Can execjs work with node6? What else would have to change to get it all
> onto node6?
It can, but other changes would be needed. For example www/gitlab pulls
in www/npm, which pulls in www/node. It also pulls in other ports that
pull in www/rubygjec-execjs.
I think the q
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 20:16 -0700, bob prohaska wrote:
Hi,
> For some reason the port of www/epiphany is asking for a version
> of graphics/gdk-pixbuf (2.36.5) later than the most recent version
> available via svn ( 2.32.3).
Epiphany depends on graphics/gdk-pixbuf2 not the really older gdk-
p
Hi,
node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view,
node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used.
Probably, the best solution would be to provide the desired node
version via Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk and then all ports depends to
the common version (like perl,
> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view,
> node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used.
> Probably, the best solution would be to provide the desired node
> version via Mk/bsd.default-v
> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view,
>> node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used.
>> Probably, the best solution wou
Adam Weinberger writes:
>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view,
>>> node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used.
>>> Probab
> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:45, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
> Adam Weinberger writes:
>
>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio
wrote:
>
Hi,
>
node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view,
>
Adam Weinberger writes:
>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:45, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>> Adam Weinberger writes:
On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio
> wrote:
> Hi,
> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a sta
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 08:09:06PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote:
>
> Epiphany depends on graphics/gdk-pixbuf2 not the really older gdk-
> pixbuf.
>
That's the key point I had missed, thanks for clarifying!
>
> I think your trying to build ports from the HEAD ports tree, but have
> quartery packages in
15 matches
Mail list logo
