Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> writes: >> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:45, Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> writes: >>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: >>>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio <luca.pizzamig...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view, >>>>> node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used. >>>>> Probably, the best solution would be to provide the desired node >>>>> version via Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk and then all ports depends to >>>>> the common version (like perl, python, ...). >>>>> In the meanwhile, node can be the new default for yarn and the >>>>> conflict will be solved (and it will be coherent with npm) >>>> Luca, >>>> You're completely right, we really need a USES=node (and there are >>>> multiple attempts at it currently floating around). In the meantime, I >>>> think you're making the right choice setting www/node as the yarn >>>> default. >>>> # Adam >>> Committed in r441191. Thanks, Luca. >>> # Adam >> Thanks all. I will abandon https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10696. > Sorry, Joseph, I wasn't aware of that phab. The update in it is still > relevant though; no need to abandon that. > # Adam No worries, I was mistaken. I did an svn diff -rPREV in my copy, which had my local changes and thought that's what you had committed. Cheers, Joseph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
