On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I have the same problem but i can pass it except for "tail_build". My
> > options :
> > GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2)
> > JAVA
> > MMEDIA
> > PGSQL
> > SVG
> >
>
> The problem is that none of the r
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > I have the same problem but i can pass it except for "tail_build". My
> > > options :
> > > GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2)
> > > JAVA
>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> > Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
> > fork. That is fork in ruby 1.9 hangs sometimes...
>
> The ONLY thing I
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >
> > I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find
> > it:
> >
> > http://www.madpilot.net/~mad/typescript.xz
> >
> > Compressing it with
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>> On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure it's a good idea.
>>> Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads and
>>> fork. That
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions of the directories created by the ports which already exist.
Old pkg_add did not have this behavior.
For example,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Actually, the problem I'm trying to debug right now is more weird.
> When I run mono via system(3) from the ruby 1.9 process (I mean,
> exactly system(3), not via some ruby wrapper) twice, it hangs on some
> umtx the second time. T
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> >> On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> >>> Ruby 1.9
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
> and pkg_jail.
>
> When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
> permissions of the directories created by the por
Stranger than fiction!
I successfully installed (and it's working) LibreOffice with gcc47!
Indeed maybe it's parallelization issue, because each time
some module failed I rm it ( e.g. rm -r
libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/boost)
and restarted build in libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:06:44AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Stranger than fiction!
>
> I successfully installed (and it's working) LibreOffice with gcc47!
>
> Indeed maybe it's parallelization issue, because each time
> some module failed I rm it ( e.g. rm -r
> libreoffice/work/libreoffice-cor
Le 05/06/2012 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions
On 6/5/12 3:00 AM, Sulev-Madis 'ketas' Silber wrote:
HTML version of this report is
here:http://ketas.si.pri.ee/ports-conflicts/po...@freebsd.org
For port accessibility/kdeaccessibility suggesting new CONFLICTS jovie-[0-9]*
kdeartwork-[0-9]* kmag-[0-9]* kmousetool-[0-9]* kmouth-[0-9]* becaus
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Romain Tartière wrote:
> I used to see the mono process in the "STOP" state
oops: read "pause" state!
^T:
> load: 0.07 cmd: mono 46160 [pause] 4854.59r 165.68u 18.57s 0% 169264k
ps l 46160:
> UID PID PPID CPU PRI NIVSZRSS MWCHAN STAT TT TI
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Hello.
I'm currently testing pkgng and poudriere as a replacement for old pkg
and pkg_jail.
When upgrading/reinstalling a port, pkg install / pkg upgrade resets the
permissions of the directories creat
Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/04/2012 04:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Yes, that's right. But I am confused why portmaster does not show the
options dialog to let user uncheck QT4?
There is code to do this if you use the --force-config option. I haven't
made that the default yet because it's a fairly
Well, I admit that this short summary was little too big. Bigger than
the another report that regularly ends up in ports@
Maybe big maintainer groups need different approach to this. And this
needs more refinement. I let things settle for a while and tell few
weeks later what is left.
With more s
Leslie Jensen writes:
> I have this on my system
>
> pkg_info | grep java
> java-zoneinfo-2012.c Updated Java timezone definitions
> javavmwrapper-2.3.5 Wrapper script for various Java Virtual Machines
>
> pkg_info | grep jdk
> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_19 Java Development Kit 1.6.0_07.02
Hi,
The up-to-date port audio/csound v5.17.4
does not build because it depends on portaudio v19.
the actual audio/portaudio is 18.XX.
even if we do not check the box for compiling portaudio the build stops.
can we upgrade portaudio to v19?
thanks and best regards.
Raoul
rm...@free.fr
___
Hi all,
The work will now begin to have a very long due feature in the ports tree.
Every sane package system are working with a stage directory support, this is
almost mandatory to have something clean.
That allows you to :
- be able to process anything but installation as a user (long
term goa
>
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:25:08PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> On 06/01/12 22:30, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'm not sure it's a good idea.
Ruby 1.9 still has some nasty bugs on FreeBSD, related to the threads
and
>>>
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
05.06.2012 17:53, Robert Huff написал:
The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
Is this deliberate? If so, why?
And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
(Tarball doesn't fetch.)
That should give you the maintainer:
-
% make -C /usr/ports/databases/postg
See this line in Makefile:
MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../postgresql90-server
wen
2012/6/5 Robert Huff
>
>The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
>Is this deliberate? If so, why?
>And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
> (Tarball doesn't fetch.)
>
>
>
* Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
>
> The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
> Is this deliberate? If so, why?
> And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
> (Tarball doesn't fetch.)
>
In the ports directory type
make maintainer
FWIW, resulting package is only
$ du -h libreoffice-3.5.2_4.tbz
94Mlibreoffice-3.5.2_4.tbz
So if somebody would like to host it, let me know.
Mind, that it's -march=native amd64 build, so
you will unfortunately need Intel Core 2 Penryn
(they added SSE 4.1 i
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
If so, what is the correct way to do so?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To un
> * Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
>
>>
>> The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line.
>> Is this deliberate? If so, why?
>> And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
>> (Tarball doesn't fetch.)
>>
>
> In the ports directory type
>
> make maintainer
[/usr/port
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find
> > > it:
> > >
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> If so, what is the correct way to do so?
>
>
> Robert Huff
>
Well it is disabled by default the parallel build you see is enable natively by
Theoretically LibreOffice already has
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes
in port's Makefile, but it's internally
still parallelizing, correct?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/make-failed-for-editors-libreoffice-tp5713591p5715337.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Helfman skrev:
>> * Robert Huff [Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:53:37 -0400]:
>>
>>> The Makefile has no MAINTAINER line. Is this deliberate? If so,
>>> why? And who do I contact about a problem building this port?
>>> (Tarball doesn't fetch.)
>>>
>> In
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:32:53PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
>
> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would
> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which
> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr.
>
> I would like to get feedback
When will the patch and extension be available for 5.4? Any idea?
--
Paul Schmehl (pa...@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:03:20AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Theoretically LibreOffice already has
>
> MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes
>
> in port's Makefile, but it's internally
> still parallelizing, correct?
Correct
regards,
Bapt
pgpc67zRP2Ecn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> If so, what is the correct way to do so?
>
>
> Robert Huff
>
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m
On 6/5/2012 4:25 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 06/04/2012 04:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Yes, that's right. But I am confused why portmaster does not show the
>>> options dialog to let user uncheck QT4?
>>
>> There is code to do this if you use the --force-config option
Hi!
> When will the patch and extension be available for 5.4? Any idea?
When I look at their webpage:
http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/download.html
It's not yet available for any php5.4.
So it's an issue upstream, not at the fbsd ports side.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> > If so, what is the correct way to do so?
> >
> >
> > Robert Huff
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> > > If so, what is the correct way to
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:55:55PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is i
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with a port I am currently maintaining. This is
the log from pointyhat:
erwin@freefall:cad/openvsp> make fetch
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
/usr/bin/fetch -o /home/erwin/tmp/OpenVSP_2.0_Community.tar.gz
https://nodeload.github.com/OpenVSP
Lars Engels wrote:
> OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
> OPTIONS_MULTI_ENCODER= LAME VORBIS FLAC
>
> OPTIONS_MULTI= ENGINE
> OPTIONS_MULTI_ENGINE= MPLAYER XINE
You are overwriting OPTIONS_MULTI. To append, use += , e.g.
OPTIONS_MULTI= ENCODER
OPTIONS_MULTI_ENCODER= LAME VO
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > > I have the same problem but i can pass it except for "tail_build". My
>> > > options :
>> > > GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe t
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
>> If so, what is the correct way to do so?
>>
>>
>> Robert Huff
>>
>> __
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:43:55 -0400
"Steve Wills" mentioned:
> >
>
> Is this perhaps the -pthread issue I hit with perl? The issue is that if
> you call (dlopen, exec, whatever) a threaded app from a non-threaded on,
> it hangs due to the fact that libc takes shortcuts and doesn't initialize
> thr
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:42:09 +0200
Romain Tartière mentioned:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:04:33AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > Actually, the problem I'm trying to debug right now is more weird.
> > When I run mono via system(3) from the ruby 1.9 process (I mean,
> > exactly system(3), not vi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Sounds similar. Unfortunately, my app is proprietary. I'll try to
> prepare some smaller test case today.
Thanks! In the meantime, I am trying to run Banshee with this in
/etc/libmap.conf:
| [/usr/local/bin/mono]
| libthr.so.3
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:08:36 +0200
Romain Tartière mentioned:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > Sounds similar. Unfortunately, my app is proprietary. I'll try to
> > prepare some smaller test case today.
>
> Thanks! In the meantime, I am trying to run Bansh
[ PLEASE don't top-post, ktnx ]
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:29:58 +0300
Sulev-Madis Silber wrote:
> Well, I admit that this short summary was little too big. Bigger than
> the another report that regularly ends up in ports@
>
> Maybe big maintainer groups need different approach to this. And this
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:18:06AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Why do you need this? libpthread.so is exactly libthr right now.
meh. I remembered some threading juggling with libpthread / libthr and
since ldd reported libthr.so I was wondering if the problem was not back
and switching to the
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:56:51 +0800
Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:41:05 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> > Last time I tested, yes, that was one of the problems.
> > Current beta from skype is at .99, you could give it a try, but I
> > don't expect anything better. And upcoming 3
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php distro
again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not including
it. Googling..
--On June 5, 2012 11:47:04 AM -0500 Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
When will the patch and extension be available for 5.4? An
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:50:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php
distro again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not
including it. Googling..
It was never included in the PHP distribution.
_
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> www/libxul has been broken for some time due to security
> vulnerabilities. This issue has been highlighted by the recent
> portrevision bump caused by png. As libxul is based on firefox-3.6
> I presume this brokenness is terminal. Since libxul i
--On June 5, 2012 2:27:12 PM -0500 Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:50:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php
distro again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not
including it. Googling..
It was
Paul Schmehl wrote on 06.06.2012 00:21:
--On June 5, 2012 2:27:12 PM -0500 Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:50:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Thanks, Kurt. Looks like it's never going to be included in the php
distro again, so now I need to find out what the consequences are of not
I inferred that you meant "distribution" == "part of the core PHP project".
Yes, it has been distributed alongside PHP on many different operating
systems.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p
On 6/5/12 4:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
It was never included in the PHP distribution.
php distribution, as in php.net
your example was for a FreeBSD port.
Yes, our ports are a lot more functional and safe than distribution,
more options, easier to use..
But the world doesn't have the advant
For one thing, skimming casually I see mostly
kde related ports conflicting with other kde ones
which I presume are false positives, removing
them from list would make it appear more
meaningful.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Ports-conflicts-chec
I am still running portmaster-Rr png- on FreeBSD 9.0 Release.
I ahd some problems, some I saved, some I saved with your help, some
applications I just uninstalled because I don't have enough time. Now I
stak with kdebinding4-perl-perlqt:
[ 21%] Building CXX object
qtcore/tools/puic/CMakeFiles/puic
On 06/05/12 14:00, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> You usually cannot dlopen the object linked agains pthread from a
> non-pthreaded object. Or it is used to be that way.
My understanding is that you can now, IFF your non-threaded object is
built with -pthread.
> Exec should work
> fine, I don't see
Em Ter, 2012-06-05 às 19:35 +0200, Heino Tiedemann escreveu:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >>Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> >>If so, what is the correct way to do so?
> >>
in the Makefile
near the
Hello all...
finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
the problem is with the boost headers and files
You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors/l
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
wrote:
> Hello all...
> finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
> the problem is with the boost headers and files
>
> You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
> but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
>
>
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Fernando Apesteguía
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a problem with a port I am currently maintaining. This is
> the log from pointyhat:
>
> erwin@freefall:cad/openvsp> make fetch
> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
> /usr/bin/fetch -o /home/
66 matches
Mail list logo
