On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider
> > wrote:
> > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new
> > > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary?
>
Martin Wilke writes:
> just for the record, i manage to get xorg-server 1.9.3 and 1.10.0 to work,
Why not 1.9.4?
> also drm, and dri works very well,
>
> screens and logs gives here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg76/
>
> I'll cleanup all the mess and commit all stuff to the xorg-dev rep
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/8/11 4:42 AM, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
>>
>> One of them that I already hunted down is bison-2.4.3,1 that gets
>> dragged in via gobject-introspection-0.9.12_1 when installing
>> xorg-7,5.1 (even as a package). This is caused by bis
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider
> > > wrote:
> > > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of
> > > > new ports were installed[1
George Liaskos wrote:
> The latest version has a GUI option to set the shortcut for switching
> between keyboard layouts. Handy for newcomers.
> It has an added dependency to librsvg2 because the country flags are
> in svg format now, the following patch takes care of the compilation
> errors.
>
> Martin Wilke:
> please recompile again and restart it should really work.
Hmm, may be I do something wrong, but it doesn`t work.
By the way, new xfce4 from fresh ports looks very bad.
After fresh install it told me 'Welcome to the first start of the panel' and
I chose 'Use default config'.
And
on 09/03/2011 21:11 Martin Wilke said the following:
> just for the record, i manage to get xorg-server 1.9.3 and 1.10.0 to work,
> also drm, and dri works very well,
>
> screens and logs gives here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg76/
>
> I'll cleanup all the mess and commit all stuff to t
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
By the way, new xfce4 from fresh ports looks very bad.
After fresh install it told me 'Welcome to the first start of the panel' and
I chose 'Use default config'.
And now I see that (look at screenshots):
Screenshot #1
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/590
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
Indeed I see this 'shortcut' being used all over the place. But in the
cases I have looked into the last few days, i.e. the xorg-7.5.1 and
kde-lite-3.5.10_8 ports, the problem is just a trivial, but slightly
different. It appears that in many occasions
Of course I did it the first thing =)
I have lastest ports.
#portsnap fecth update && portmaster -ad
# pkg_info | grep xfce4-utils
xfce4-utils-4.8.1_1 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts
2011/3/10 Warren Block
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
> By the way, new xfce4 from fresh
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:53:56 -0600, Pavel Timofeev
wrote:
Also opera crashes my system when I use it in xfce4. It permanently
hangs,
no messages in logs and no response from system. If I launch opera in
clean
Xorg (twm?) it works very good.
I also run Opera but I was getting hangs on
Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree. Sadly, there are a
number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility issues between this and
3.81 which makes a simple replacement unworkable.
A new port, devel/gmake381 has just been committed to the tree which is a
heavily strip
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Martin Wilke wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider
wrote:
I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of
new ports we
stable/8 i386,
Can we get this fixed please!. It does not stop compilation and build
succeeds and runs as expected though were throwing non-existent options to
gcc or any other compiler that's used.
I noticed this a few weeks ago when I first built the port but let it be
figuring it would p
On 03/10/2011 09:43, Ade Lovett wrote:
Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree. Sadly,
there are a number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility
issues between this and 3.81 which makes a simple replacement
unworkable.
Can you give us an idea of how many ports we're
I have been using mysql since fbsd 7.2 and always just issued the
mysql_install_db command on the command line to create mysql's control
databases and it always worked fine.
But now with fbsd 8.2 I get the following error and have no idea why.
I installed using pkg_add -r mysql55-server command.
On Mar 10, 2011, at 13:24 , Doug Barton wrote:
> Can you give us an idea of how many ports we're talking about? Rather than
> having 2 gmake ports (which is likely to last for a very long time, "best
> laid plans" aside) can we at least explore the idea of fixing things that are
> broken to wor
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:37:20 -0500
joeb articulated:
> I have been using mysql since fbsd 7.2 and always just issued the
> mysql_install_db command on the command line to create mysql's control
> databases and it always worked fine.
>
> But now with fbsd 8.2 I get the following error and have no
On Thursday, March 10, 2011 03:28:40 am Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Michael Scheidell
>
> wrote:
> > On 3/8/11 4:42 AM, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> >> One of them that I already hunted down is bison-2.4.3,1 that gets
> >> dragged in via gobject-introspection-0.9.12_1 whe
On 03/10/2011 12:05, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 13:24 , Doug Barton wrote:
Can you give us an idea of how many ports we're talking about?
Rather than having 2 gmake ports (which is likely to last for a
very long time, "best laid plans" aside) can we at least explore
the idea of fixin
Hello,
Now that cherrypy 3.2 is in the ports tree, I think you should remove the
following lines in the FreeBSD patch:
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
sys.exit(1)
import cherrypy
-if not cherrypy.__version__.startswith("3.2"):
-print "Sorry, requires Python module Cherrypy 3.2 (use the included
v
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, joeb wrote:
I have been using mysql since fbsd 7.2 and always just issued the
mysql_install_db command on the command line to create mysql's control
databases and it always worked fine.
But now with fbsd 8.2 I get the following error and have no idea why.
I installed using
On Mar 10, 2011, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that the URL for the logs of that run get posted here,
> along with contacting the maintainers of the affected ports. Then let's see
> what people have to say about getting them fixed sooner rather than later.
> Can you exp
On 03/10/2011 12:52, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that the URL for the logs of that run get
posted here, along with contacting the maintainers of the affected
ports. Then let's see what people have to say about getting them
fixed sooner
Hey all!
Just wanted to say that I have been made a voting member of portmgr@
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2011/03/10/new-member-for-portmgr/
Thomas
--
Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer
tabtho...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe
pgpUzfso3k4Gi.pgp
Descrip
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> Just wanted to say that I have been made a voting member of portmgr@
>
> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2011/03/10/new-member-for-portmgr/
Congratulations. (What is the reward for doing some work, but even *more*
work...? :-)
Regards,
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:37 AM, joeb wrote:
> FATAL ERROR: Could not find ./bin/my_print_defaults
Does running rehash in your shell help it find the binary? Or does using
--basedir /usr/local/bin help?
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :)
Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
Would that be different from turning off the X11 config option of the
ImageMagi
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :)
Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
Would that be different from turning
Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine.
> > > :)
> >
> > Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
>
> Would that be different from t
On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :)
Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
Would that be different from turning o
On Thursday 10 March 2011 22:17:58 Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> Just wanted to say that I have been made a voting member of portmgr@
yay!
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
Most seminars have a happy ending. Everyone's glad when they're over.
signature.asc
Desc
Tried that with on results.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:26 PM
To: j...@a1poweruser.com
Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.5.9
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:37 AM, joeb wrote:
> FATAL ERROR:
J Hellenthal writes:
> stable/8 i386,
> Can we get this fixed please!. It does not stop compilation and build
> succeeds and runs as expected though were throwing non-existent
> options to gcc or any other compiler that's used.
> I noticed this a few weeks ago when I first built the port but let
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote:
> Preliminary runs show ~50 ports that break with 3.82, some of them
> unfortunately being dependencies for a reasonable number of others.
For values of "reasonable" in the ~1100 range.
mcl
___
On Mar 10, 2011, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
> I admire your optimism, however experience tells us that once these
> types of accomodations get into the tree, they stay there for a long
> time.
Here's what I have on my system:
devel/autoconf
devel/autoconf213
devel/automake
devel/automa
Mark Linimon writes:
> Summary: there used to be a lot of auto* ports. There aren't,
> now.
Am I correct in remembering the "used to be" period covered
2+(+) years?
Robert "sure seemed like it :-)" Huff
__
On 03/10/2011 15:54, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
I admire your optimism, however experience tells us that once these
types of accomodations get into the tree, they stay there for a long
time.
Here's what I have on my system:
devel/autoconf
devel/au
Congratulations !
wen
2011/3/11 Thomas Abthorpe :
> Hey all!
>
> Just wanted to say that I have been made a voting member of portmgr@
>
> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2011/03/10/new-member-for-portmgr/
>
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer
> tabtho...@freebsd.or
2011/3/11 Sylvain :
> Hello,
>
> Now that cherrypy 3.2 is in the ports tree, I think you should remove the
> following lines in the FreeBSD patch:
>
> @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
> sys.exit(1)
>
> import cherrypy
> -if not cherrypy.__version__.startswith("3.2"):
> - print "Sorry, requires Python mod
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine.
:)
Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
Would that be
I recent did a first-pass experimental ports run with gmake3.82. The
results from that were pretty bad: 38 confirmed errors (5 more possible),
with ~1100 ports as collateral damage, mostly from audio/portaudio and
devel/p5-Module-Build.
After a brief discussion among the portmgrs, we decided to m
On Mar 10, 2011, at 18:09 , Doug Barton wrote:
> First, my point was not "there are going to be a lot of gmake ports," my
> point was, "there will be >1 for a long time after it's split into >1." You
> have now proved my point, thanks.
Apples and oranges, my friend. Given the sheer amount of s
On 03/10/2011 19:46, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 18:09 , Doug Barton wrote:
First, my point was not "there are going to be a lot of gmake
ports," my point was, "there will be>1 for a long time after it's
split into>1." You have now proved my point, thanks.
Apples and oranges, my fri
I answered this question last night on IRC, aDe answered it in email:
> What is the urgency in upgrading gmake that prevents "fix the broken
> ports first" as an option to at least explore?
Now that gmake is out, if the past is any indication, some project
will quickly upgrade to it. We can wait
On Mar 10, 2011, at 22:02 , Doug Barton wrote:
> But if you'd like to engage in a discussion rather than throwing around ad
> hominem's and pointless "patches welcome" statements, maybe you can show me
> why I'm wrong.
How about working from the basis that perhaps, just perhaps, I'm _right_, an
46 matches
Mail list logo
