Peter Clark writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure where to ask this question so I am going to start here,
> if this is not the correct place any direction to where I should as
> would be appreciated.
>
> I have 2 Freebsd 7.2p1 fresh installs. I have installed a number of
> ports while trying to conf
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:37:52 +0300
"Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote:
> 1) deinstall portaudit
> 2) upgrate all ports
> 3) install portaudit if you need it
>
> or
>
> 1)rm /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz
> 2) upgrate all ports
> 3) portaudit -F
Way too much trouble and potentially dangerous.
Enter thi
2009/6/25 :
>> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
>> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
>>
>> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
>
> Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's short, should still tab-complete
> from "in", and it may be a
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> >> Choosing "%" to differentiate it, however, was a bad idea. It would
> >> be better to use a simple underscore.
> > Why is % any worse than an underscore? As I explained earlier, fetch has no
> > problem dealing with it. The errors people were posting are server-s
В Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:12:06 -0400
Jerry пишет:
J> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:37:52 +0300
J> "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote:
J>
J> > 1) deinstall portaudit
J> > 2) upgrate all ports
J> > 3) install portaudit if you need it
J> >
J> > or
J> >
J> > 1)rm /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz
J> > 2) upgrate all p
Hello List,
I downloaded a package from pointyhat:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-packages-latest/databases/fpc-postgres-2.2.4.tbz
And can not do a "pkg_add -f" of this package:
-
# uname -a
FreeBSD moosi 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 22 21:04:20 MSD 2009
r.
Johan van Selst wrote:
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
Choosing "%" to differentiate it, however, was a bad idea. It would
be better to use a simple underscore.
Why is % any worse than an underscore? As I explained earlier, fetch has no
problem dealing with it. The errors people were
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hello List,
I downloaded a package from pointyhat:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-packages-latest/databases/fpc-postgres-2.2.4.tbz
And can not do a "pkg_add -f" of this package:
-
# uname -a
FreeBSD moosi 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 22
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:30:01 -0400 Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > I downloaded a package from pointyhat:
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-packages-latest/databases/fpc-postgres-2.2.4.tbz
> >
> > And can not do a "pkg_add -f" of this package:
> > -
> > # un
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's short, should still tab-complete
from "in", and i
Hi, i've upgraded php to 5.2.10 with portupgrade, php5-readline-5.2.10
won't compile.
Here's the error:
---> Upgrading 'php5-readline-5.2.9' to 'php5-readline-5.2.10'
(devel/php5-readline)
OK? [yes]
---> Build of devel/php5-readline started at: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:09:16
+0200
---> Building '/usr
Is there a standard way to write ports which use GNU_CONFIGURE to follow
NOPORTDOCS? Ideally it'd be something as simple as setting --docdir=NULL or
similar, and even more ideally by having bsd.port.mk taking care of that. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
fre
On Thursday 25 June 2009 09:57:52 am you wrote:
> i think that you will could use CONFIGURE_ARGS
But what args would you actually use? How do you tell autotools not to
install documentation at all?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:40:42AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Is there a standard way to write ports which use GNU_CONFIGURE to follow
> NOPORTDOCS? Ideally it'd be something as simple as setting --docdir=NULL or
> similar, and even more ideally by having bsd.port.mk taking care of that. :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Is there a standard way to write ports which use GNU_CONFIGURE to follow
> NOPORTDOCS? Ideally it'd be something as simple as setting --docdir=NULL or
> similar, and even more ideally by having bsd.port.mk taking care of that.
I picked up the new ports:
gnucash-2.2.9_2
aqbanking-4.1.0
gwenhywfar-3.9.0
libgmp-4.3.1
guile-1.8.6_1
goffice-0.7.7
libgsf-1.14.14
and was able to build gnucash and aqbanking together successfully;
I am able to do ofx operations (get statements) so it seems to work.
Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton
> wrote:
> There ought to be an automated way to deal with the package issue that
> causes the failure of the entire update run just because it wants a human
> to type "make deinstall && make reinstall".
Sorry I wasn'
Johan van Selst wrote:
I have another suggestion: why not tell it that this specific patch file
should be fetched from the FreeBSD server and not try all the other vim
mirror sites. We have a mechanism to do so, which seems appropriate here.
I was thinking exactly this, but never got around to
Friday will be one week for the topic, at which point I will take on
the next leg of the battle, which is making the pitch to portmgr.
Thomas
On 25/06/2009, Mark Foster wrote:
> per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
internationalization is too lon
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
> > > => Attempting to fetch from
> > > http://garr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/netpbm/.
> > > netpbm-10.26.62.tgz 100% of 2485 kB 379 kBps
> > > ===> Extracting for netpbm-10.26.62
> > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for netp
The default source for ports 'make fetchindex' (MASTER_SITE_INDEX) is
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/
The ports INDEX files at that location are stale. They were last
updated about 4 days ago.
ozsrv02> fetch http://www.freebsd.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 \
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/IND
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/6/25 :
>>> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
>>> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
>>>
>>> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
>>
>> Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's sho
- Original Message -
From: "Andrea 'simplex' Zulato"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject: php5-readline-5.2.10 patch compile error
Hi, i've upgraded php to 5.2.10 with portupgrade, php5-readline-5.2.10
won't compile.
.
.
.
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to co
23 matches
Mail list logo
