On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:40:42AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > Is there a standard way to write ports which use GNU_CONFIGURE to follow > NOPORTDOCS? Ideally it'd be something as simple as setting --docdir=NULL or > similar, and even more ideally by having bsd.port.mk taking care of that. :-)
Not really. What I usually do is have a post-patch: target that
does a REINPLACE_CMD on all the Makefile.in's found in the port's
directpry and just removes the "install-doc" target; something like:
.ifdef(NOPORTDOCS)
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -E -e 's/ install-docDATA/ /; s/^(SUBDIRS.+)doc/\1/' \
${WRKSRC}/Makefile.in
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -E -e 's/([^n])install-examplesDATA/\1/' \
${WRKSRC}/tools/Makefile.in
.endif
This is taken from the security/stunnel port; you may need to fit it
for your specific port's needs, or, if there are many Makefile.in files,
use ${FIND} | ${XARGS} to process them all at once.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@space.bg r...@freebsd.org
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else?
pgpn3xqcd84du.pgp
Description: PGP signature
